Skip to main content


Log in

Socioeconomic analysis of patient-centric networks: effects of patients and hospitals’ characteristics and network structure on hospitalization costs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Improving operations and delivery of cost-effective healthcare services is considered to be an important area of investigation due to the challenges in allocation of resources in meeting the increasing cost of health care for the twenty-first century. To date, appropriate mechanisms for systematic evaluation of hospital operations and its impact of the delivery of cost-effective healthcare services are lacking. This is, perhaps, the first study, which focuses on using large insurance claims data to develop a social network-based model for exploring the effect of patient–doctor tie strength and patient socio-demographic factors for exploring the social structure of operations and delivery of cost-effective healthcare services. We suggest that delivery of cost-effective healthcare services and operation is embedded within the social structure of hospitals. By exploring the mode of hospital operations in terms of their patient-centric care network, we are able to develop a better understanding of the operation and delivery of cost-effective healthcare services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. National Health Expenditure Data. OECD health data 2010: Statistics and indicators (2010)

  2. Forrest, G., Roque, J., Dawodu, S.: Decreasing length of stay after total joint arthroplasty: effect on referrals to rehabilitation units. Am. Arch. Rehabil. Ther. 80(2), 192–194 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Collins, T., et al.: Risk factors for prolonged length of stay after major elective surgery. Ann. Surg. 230, p. 251 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sidiropoulos, A., Katsaros, D., Manolopoulos, Y.: Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics 72(2), 253–280 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Iezzoni, L.: The risks of risk adjustment. JAMA 278(19), 1600–1607 (1997)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Forrest, G., et al.: Factors affecting length of stay and need for rehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty* 1. J. Arthroplasty 13(2), 186–190 (1998)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burns, L., Wholey, D.: The effects of patient, hospital, and physician characteristics on length of stay and mortality. Med. Care 29(3), 251–271 (1991)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Brien, S.: An outcome study on average length of stay following total hip and knee replacement. J. Orthop. Nurs. 6(3), 161–169 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ivory, J., et al.: Total hip replacement. BMJ 3(2), p. 114 (1994)

  10. Lee, A.H., Fung, W.K., Fu, B.: Analyzing hospital length of stay: mean or median regression? Med. Care 41(5), p. 681 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chung, KKS., Hossain, L., Davis, J.: Exploring sociocentric and egocentric approaches for social network analysis. In: Proceedings of the international conference on knowledge management in Asia Pacific. Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand (2005)

  12. Keith, M., Demirkan, H., Goul, M.: How does collaborative group technology influence social network structure?. In: Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, p. 57 (2008)

  13. Keith, M., Demirkan, H., Goul, M.: Coordination network analysis: a research framework for studying the organizational impacts of service-orientation in business intelligence. In: Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa (2007)

  14. Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)

  15. Mullen, B., Johnson, C., Salas, E.: Effects of communication network structure: Components of positional centrality. Soc. Netw. 13(2), 169–185 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brandes, U., Fleischer, D.: Centrality measures based on current flow. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

  17. Chung, K., Hossain, L., Davis, J.: Social networks and ICT correlates to individual performance. In: Applications of Social Network Analysis. University of Zurich, Switzerland (2005)

  18. Everett, M., Borgatti, S.: The centrality of groups and classes. J. Math. Sociol. 23, 181–202 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Granovetter, M.S.: The strength of weak ties. Am. J. sociol. 78(6) p. 1360 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Krackhardt, D.: The strength of strong ties: the importance of philos in organizations. Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action, pp. 216–239 (1992)

  21. Levin, D.Z., Cross R.: The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Manag. sci., 1477–1490 (2004)

  22. Hansen, M.T.: The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Adm. Sci. Q. 44(1), 82–85 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Reagans, R.. Zuckerman, E.: Networks, diversity, and productivity: the social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 502–517 (2001)

  24. Luke, D., Harris, J.: Network analysis in public health: history, methods, and applications. Pub. Health 28 (2007)

  25. Corteville, L., Sun, M.: An interorganizational social network analysis of the michigan diabetes outreach networks, Michigan department of community health report (2009)

  26. Boyer, L., et al.: A social network analysis of healthcare professional relationships in a French hospital. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 23(5), 460–469 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Horwitz, S., Morgenstern, H., Berkman, L.: The impact of social stressors and social networks on pediatric medical care use. Med. Care 23(8), 946–959 (1985)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. St Clair, P., et al.: Social network structure and prenatal care utilization. Med. Care, 27(8) p. 823 (1989)

  29. Heckathorn, D., et al.: AIDS and social networks: HIV prevention through network mobilization. Sociol. Focus 32(2), 159–179 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Anderson, J., Jay, S.: The diffusion of medical technology: social network analysis and policy research. Sociol. Q. 26(1), 49–64 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Uddin, M., Hossain, L.: Social networks enabled coordination model for cost management of patient hospital admissions. J. Healthcare Qual. (in press)

  32. Vincent, H., et al.: Sex and age effects on outcomes of total hip arthroplasty after inpatient rehabilitation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 87(4), 461–467 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Motulsky, H.: Analyzing data with graphpad prism. Graphpad software San Diego, CA (1999)

  34. Leape, L.: Error in medicine. Jama. 272(23), 1851 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Degenne, A., Forsé, M.: Introducing social networks. Sage Publications Ltd, Thousand Oaks (1999)

  36. Scott, J., Social network analysis: a handbook. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1991)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Abbasi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abbasi, A., Uddin, S. & Hossain, L. Socioeconomic analysis of patient-centric networks: effects of patients and hospitals’ characteristics and network structure on hospitalization costs. Eur J Health Econ 13, 267–276 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


JEL Classification