Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparing costs and effectiveness of different starting points for highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-positive patients

Evidence from the ICONA cohort

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated the costs and effectiveness of starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) at different points during the course of HIV infection, defined on the basis of CD4 T-lymphocytes counts. The study considered 3,250 HAART-naive patients of the Italian Cohort Naive Antiretrovirals (ICONA), enrolled and followed between 1997 and 2002. In correspondence to the thresholds of 500, 350, and 200 CD4 cells/mm3, we selected immediate and deferred groups accounting for lead-time bias. The effects of immediate vs. deferred treatment on AIDS-free survival and direct health costs were estimated stratifying on the propensity score of immediate HAART initiation. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve were also obtained. Although immediate HAART initiation did not affect incidence AIDS and death at high CD4 levels, starting HAART with 200–349 CD4 cells/mm3 rather than deferring it below 200 CD4 cells/mm3, proved to be cost-effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shi M, Taylor JM, Currier RJ et al. (1996) Replacing time since human immunodeficiency virus infection by marker values in predicting residual time to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome diagnosis. Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 12:309–316

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Murphy EL, Collier AC, Kalish LA et al. (2001) Highly active antiretroviral therapy decreases mortality and morbidity in patients with advanced HIV disease. Ann Intern Med 135:17–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaplan JE, Hanson D, Dworkin MS et al. (2000) Epidemiology of human immunodeficiency virus-associated opportunistic infections in the United States in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis 30 [Suppl]:S5–S14

  4. Phillips AN, Cozzi-Lepri A, Lampe F et al. (2003) When should antiretroviral therapy be started for HIV infection? Interpreting the evidence from observational studies. AIDS 17:1863–1869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Egger M, May M, Chene G et al. (2002) Prognosis of HIV-1 infected patients starting highly active antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative analysis of prospective studies. Lancet 360:119–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Opravil M, Ledergerber B, Hansjakob F et al. (2002) Clinical efficacy of early initiation of HAART in patients with asymptomatic HIV infection and CD4 cell count >350×106/l. AIDS 16:1371–1381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaplan JE, Hanson DL, Cohn DL et al. (2003) When to begin highly active antiretroviral therapy? Evidence supporting initiation of therapy at CD4+ lymphocyte counts <350 cells/microL. Clin Infect Dis 37:951–958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Monforte A, Arici C, Ippolito G et al. (1997) Lo studio di coorte I.CO.N.A. (Italian Cohort Naive Antiretrovirals): caratteristiche all’arruolamento dei primi 1676 soggetti. G Ital AIDS 8:119–126

    Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV infected adults and adolescents. Archived guidelines 1998–2002. Available at: http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines/archive.asp

  10. Ahdieh-Grant L, Yamashita TE, Phair JP et al. (2003) When to initiate highly active antiretroviral therapy: a cohort approach. Am J Epidemiol 157:738–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cole S, Li R, Anastos K et al. (2004) Accounting for lead-time in cohort studies: evaluating when to initiate HIV therapies. Stat Med 23:3351–3363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Taylor JM, Law N (1998) Does the covariance structure matter in longitudinal modelling for the prediction of future CD4 counts? Stat Med 17:2381–2394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marschner IC, Betensky RA, De Gruttola V et al. (1999) Clinical trials using HIV-1 RNA-based primary endpoints: statistical analysis and potential biases. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 20:220–227

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Polsky D, Glick HA, Willke R et al. (1997) Confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: a comparison of four methods. Health Econ 6:243–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall: New York:

  16. Stinnet AA, Mullahy J (1998) A new framework for the analysis of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Decis Making 18 [Suppl]:S68–S80

  17. Hout BA van, Maiwenn JAL, Gordon GS et al. (1994) Costs, effects and C/E-ratios alongside a clinical trial. Health Econ 3:309–319

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Hagan A, Stevens JW, Montmartin J (2000) Inference for the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve and cost-effectiveness ratio. Pharmacoeconomics 17:339–349

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sabin CA, Phillips AN, Lee CA et al. (1994) Beta-2 microbulin as a predictor of prognosis in HIV-infected men with haemophilia: a proposed strategy for use in clinical care. Br J Haematol 86:366–371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Concorde Coordinating Committee (1994) Concorde: MRC/ANRS randomised double-blind controlled trial of immediate and deferred zidovudine in symptom-free HIV infection. Lancet 343:871–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sabin CA, Phillips AN (2001) Treatment comparisons in HIV infection: the benefits and limitations of observational cohort studies. J Antimicrob Chemother 47:371–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70:41–55

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lacey L, Mauskopf J, Lindrooth R et al. (1999) A prospective cost-consequence analysis of adding lamivudine to zidovudine-containing antiretroviral treatment regimens for HIV infection in the US. Pharmacoeconomics 15 S1:23–37

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The ICONA network is supported by an unrestricted educational grant provided by GlaxoSmithKline Italy. The members of the ICONA Study Group are: Ancona: M. Montroni, G. Scalise, M.C. Braschi, M.S. Del Prete; Aviano: U. Tirelli, R. Cinelli; Bari: G. Pastore, N. Ladisa, G. Minafra; Bergamo: F. Suter, C. Arici; Bologna: F. Chiodo, V. Colangeli, C. Fiorini, O. Coronado; Brescia: G. Carosi, G.P. Cadeo, C. Torti, C. Minardi, D. Bertelli; Busto Arsizio: G. Rizzardini, G. Migliorino; Cagliari: P.E. Manconi, P. Piano; Catanzaro: T. Ferraro, A. Scerbo; Chieti: E. Pizzigallo, M. D’Alessandro; Como: D. Santoro, L. Pusterla; Cremona: G. Carnevale, D. Galloni; Cuggiono: P. Viganò, M. Mena; Ferrara: F. Ghinelli, L. Sighinolfi; Firenze: F. Leoncini, F. Mazzotta, M. Pozzi, S. Lo Caputo; Foggia: G. Angarano, B. Grisorio, A. Saracino, S. Ferrara; Galatina: P. Grima, P. Tundo; Genova: G. Pagano, G. Cassola, A. Alessandrini, R. Piscopo; Grosseto: M. Toti, S. Chigiotti; Latina: F. Soscia, L. Tacconi; Lecco: A. Orani, P. Perini; Lucca: A. Scasso, A. Vincenti; Macerata: F. Chiodera, P. Castelli; Mantova: A. Scalzini, G. Fibbia; Milan: M. Moroni, A. Lazzarin, A. Cargnel, G.M. Vigevani, L. Caggese, A. d’Arminio Monforte, D. Repetto, R. Novati, A. Galli, S. Merli, C. Pastecchia, M.C. Moioli; Modena: R. Esposito, C. Mussini; Napoli: N. Abrescia, A. Chirianni, C.M. Izzo, M. Piazza, M. De Marco, R. Viglietti, E. Manzillo, M. Graf; Palermo: A. Colomba, V. Abbadessa, T. Prestileo, S. Mancuso; Parma: C. Ferrari, P. Pizzaferri; Pavia: G. Filice, L. Minoli, R. Bruno, S. Novati; Perugia: F. Baldelli, M. Tinca; Pesaro: E. Petrelli, A. Cioppi; Piacenza: F. Alberici, A. Ruggieri; Pisa: F. Menichetti, C. Martinelli; Potenza: C. De Stefano, A. La Gala; Ravenna: G. Ballardini, E. Briganti; Reggio Emilia: G. Magnani, M.A. Ursitti; Rimini: M. Arlotti, P. Ortolani; Roma: R. Cauda, F. Dianzani, G. Ippolito, A. Antinori, G. Antonucci, S. D’Elia, P. Narciso, N. Petrosillo, V. Vullo, A. De Luca, S. Di Giambenedetti, M. Zaccarelli, R. Acinapura, P. De Longis, M. Ciardi, G. D’Offizi, MP Trotta, P. Noto, M. Lichtner, M.R. Capobianchi, E. Girardi, P. Pezzotti, G. Rezza; Sassari: M.S. Mura, M. Mannazzu; Taranto: F. Resta, K. Loso; Torino: P. Caramello, A. Sinicco, M.L. Soranzo, G. Orofino, M. Sciandra, M. Bonasso; Varese: P.A. Grossi, C. Basilico; Verbania: A. Poggio, G. Bottari; Venezia: E. Raise, S. Pasquinucci; Vicenza: F. De Lalla, G. Tositti; London, UK: A. Cozzi Lepri.

Conflict of interest:

No information supplied

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Merito.

Additional information

See “Acknowledgements” for the members of the ICONA Study Group

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merito, M., Pezzotti, P. & for the ICONA Study Group. Comparing costs and effectiveness of different starting points for highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-positive patients. Eur J Health Econ 7, 30–36 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-005-0327-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-005-0327-9

Keywords

Navigation