Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The efficiency of treatment strategies of general practitioners

A Malmquist index approach

  • Congress Papers
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics, formerly: HEPAC Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is widely recognized that general practitioners (GPs) play a key role in determining the use of resources for ambulatory care. In addition to the GPs' working hours, these resources consist of the work of specialists and that of hospital physicians treating the GPs' referrals and the cost of medication and other measures induced by the GP. Different systems of remuneration differ in their power to lead to efficient service provision. This contribution provides empirical evidence on the efficiency of service provision by Austrian GPs. The analysis is based on data for some 600 GPs. The data comprise sufficient information to assess the GPs' efficiency with regard to the way they manage their cases. Data Envelopment Analysis, a nonparametric technique, is used to estimate the production frontier. The results suggest that almost one-half of the GPs in the sample have a relative efficiency of 0.8 or less. A Malmquist decomposition of the productivity change reveals a decline in productivity. This is due to a pronounced negative shift of the frontier whereas individual efficiency rises against the weaker benchmark of the new frontier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ali AI (1994) Computational aspects of DEA. In: Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin A, Seiford LM (eds) Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology, and application. Kluwer: Boston

  2. Andersen P, Petersen NC (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 39:1261–1264

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burgess JF, Wilson PW (1995) Decomposing hospital productivity changes 1985–1988: a nonparametric Malmquist approach. J Productiv Anal 6:343–363

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2000) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Kluwer: Boston

  5. Chilingerian JA, Sherman HD (1997) DEA and primary care physician report cards: deriving preferred practice cones from managed care service concepts and operation strategies. Ann Oper Res 48:35–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dulá JH, Hickman BL (1997) Effects of excluding the column being scored from the DEA evelopment LP technology matrix. J Oper Res Soc 73:35–66

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eisenberg JM (1986) Doctors' decisions and the cost of medical care: the reasons for doctors' practice patterns and ways to change them. Health Administration: Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hadi AS (1992) Identifying multiple outliers in multivariate data. J R Stat Soc B 54:761–771

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hadi AS (1994) A modification for a method for the detection of outliers in multivariate samples. J R Stat Soc B 56:393–396

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hollingsworth B, Dawson PJ, Maniadakis N (1999) Efficiency measurement of health care: a review of non-parametric methods and applications. Health Care Manage Sci 2:161–172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kittelsen AC (1999) Monte Carlo simulations of DEA efficiency measures and hypothesis tests. Memorandum 09/99. University of Oslo, Department of Economics: Oslo

  12. Kneip A Park B, Simar L (1998) A note on the convergence of nonparametric DEA estimators for production efficiency scores. Econometric Theory 14:783–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Laffont J-J, Tirole J (1999) A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation. Cambridge

  14. Ley E (1992) Data screening and data envelopment analysis. Economic and Financial Modelling With Mathematica Hal Varian. Springer-Telos: Heidelberg

  15. Ozcan YA (1998) Physician benchmarking: measuring variation in practice behaviour in treatment of otitis media. Health Care Manage Sci 1:5–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Seiford LM, Zhu J (1999) Infeasibility of super-efficiency data envelopment analysis models. Inforation 37:174–187

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simar L, Wilson PW (2000) Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: the state of the art. J Productiv Anal 13:49–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scott A (2000) Economics of general practice. In: Anthony JC, Newhouse JP Handbook of health economics. Elsevier: Amsterdam

  19. Wilson PW (1993) Detecting outliers in deterministic nonparametric frontier models with multiple outputs. J Business Econ Stat 11:319–323

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xue M, Harker PT (2002) Note: ranking DMUs with infeasible super-efficiency DEA models. Manage Sci 48:705–711

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Mannheim, Germany

    Matthias Staat

  2. Lehrstuhl für VWL insb. Mikroökonomik, Universität Mannheim, 68131, Mannheim, Germany

    Matthias Staat

Authors
  1. Matthias Staat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Staat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Staat, M. The efficiency of treatment strategies of general practitioners. HEPAC 4, 232–238 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-003-0199-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-003-0199-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation