Skip to main content
Log in

Complications de la coloscopie diagnostique en 2015

Diagnostic colonoscopy-related complications in 2015

  • Dossier Thématique / Thematic File
  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

Résumé

La coloscopie diagnostique est un acte médicotechnique de plus en plus prescrit et constitue en 2015 le gold standard de l’exploration de la face muqueuse du côlon qu’il s’agisse de pathologies inflammatoires ou tumorales. Comme tout geste médicotechnique, la coloscopie diagnostique est associée à des complications allant du simple ballonnement post-insufflation à la perforation digestive pouvant nécessiter une réparation chirurgicale et grevée d’une morbidité, voire d’une mortalité propre non nulle, particulièrement chez le sujet âgé. L’objectif de cet article est de faire le point sur l’incidence des complications mineures et majeures de la coloscopie diagnostique.

Abstract

Colonoscopy is widely used to explore colonic pathology, such as for screening colon cancer and inflammatory bowel disease. It is a medical and technical procedure and complications may occur. Complications could be minor: post-colonoscopy bloating; or major: colonic perforation requiring a surgical treatment in some cases. Colonoscopy is associated with significant higher morbid-mortality in elderly patients. We discuss in this article the incidence of minor and major complications related to diagnostic colonoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. http://www.ameli.fr/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/061212_Coloscopie.pdf.

  2. Fisher DA, Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, et al. Complications of colonoscopy. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:745–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Castro G, Azrak MF, Seeff LC, et al. Outpatient colonoscopy complications in the CDC’s Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: a prospective analysis. Cancer 2013;119:2849–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamdani U, Naeem R, Haider F, et al. Risk factors for colonoscopic perforation: a population-based study of 80118 cases. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:3596–601.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chukmaitov A, Bradley CJ, Dahman B, et al. Association of polypectomy techniques, endoscopist volume, and facility type with colonoscopy complications. Gastrointest Endosc 2013;77:436–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee SK, Kim TI, Shin SJ, et al. Impact of prior abdominal or pelvic surgery on colonoscopy outcomes. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006;40:711–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Messina CR, Cohn W, Gottfried E, et al. Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:558–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arora G, Mannalithara A, Singh G, et al. Risk of perforation from a colonoscopy in adults: a large population-based study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:654–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lohsiriwat V. Colonoscopic perforation: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:425–30.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Panteris V, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ. Colonoscopy perforation rate, mechanisms and outcome: from diagnostic to therapeutic colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2009;41:941–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Paspatis GA, Dumonceau JM, Barthet M, et al. Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2014;46:693–711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Day LW, Kwon A, Inadomi JM, et al. Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:885–96.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mai CM, Wen CC, Wen SH, et al. Iatrogenic colonic perforation by colonoscopy: a fatal complication for patients with a high anesthesic risk. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010;25:449–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the US. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:638–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ko CW, Dominitz JA. Complications of colonoscopy: magnitude and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2010;20:659–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boustière C, Veitch A, Vanbiervliet G, et al. Endoscopy and antiplatelet agents. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2011;43:445–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Piccolo G, Di Vita M, Cavallaro A, et al. Presentation and management of splenic injury after colonoscopy: a systematic review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Techn 2014;24:95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singla S, Keller D, Thirunavukarasu P, et al. Splenic injury during colonoscopy: a complication that warrants urgent attention. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:1225–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi YJ, Park JS, Kim GE, et al. Mesocolon laceration following colonoscopy. Korean J Gastroenterol 2014;63:313–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee YC, Wang HP, Chiu HM, et al. Factors determining postcolonoscopy abdominal pain: prospective study of screening colonoscopy in 1000 subjects. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;21: 1575–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu J, Hu B. The role of carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2012; 44:128–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen YJ, Lee J, Puryear M, et al. A randomized controlled study comparing room air with carbon dioxide for abdominal pain, distention, and recovery time in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Nurs 2014;37:273–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nelson DB. Infectious disease complications of GI endoscopy: Part I, endogenous infections. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57: 546–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Heresbach D, Vanbiervliet G. Recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Acta Endosc 2008; 4:401–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yagnik VD, Yagnik BD. Post-colonoscopy appendicitis: a rare entity. Clin Pract 2012;2:e55.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ko CW, Dominitz JA. Complications of colonoscopy: magnitude and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2010;20:659–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Le Baleur.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baleur, Y.L. Complications de la coloscopie diagnostique en 2015. Acta Endosc 45, 99–102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10190-015-0441-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10190-015-0441-1

Mots clés

Keywords

Navigation