Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comment défendre le point de vue de l’endoscopiste dans une réunion de concertation pluridisciplinaire ?

How to assert the endoscopist’s point of view in a multidisciplinary board for gastrointestinal cancer?

  • Videodigest
  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Références

  1. Lambert R. Endoscopy in screening for digestive cancer. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2012;4:518–525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lambert R, Kudo SE, Vieth M, Allen JI, Fujii H, Fujii T, et al. Pragmatic classification of superficial neoplastic colorectal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;70:1182–1199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:S3–S43.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ASGE Technology Committee, Wong Kee Song LM, Adler DG, Chand B, Conway JD, Croffie JM, et al. Chromoendoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;66:639–649.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goetz M, Hoetker MS, Diken M, Galle PR, Kiesslich R. In vivo molecular imaging with cetuximab, an anti-EGFR antibody, for prediction of response in xenograft models of human colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 2013;45:469–477.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shahid MW, Buchner AM, Coron E, Woodward TA, Raimondo M, Dekker E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in detecting residual colorectal neoplasia after EMR: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75: 525–533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giovanini M. Résection endoscopique des tumeurs superficielles du tube digestif: mucosectomie ou dissection sous-muqueuse ? Hepato Gastro 2010;17:304–311.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. service d’hépatogastroentérologie et de cancérologie digestive, Université François Rabelais, Tours, F-37044, Tours cedex 9, France

    T. Lecomte

  2. Cabinet d’hépatogastroentérologie, 1033, avenue de la République, F-59700, Marcq-en-Barœul, France

    E. Vaillant

  3. Service d’anatomie pathologique, hôpital Saint-Antoine, Faculté de médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, 184, rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, F-75012, Paris, France

    J. -F. Flejou

Authors
  1. T. Lecomte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Vaillant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. -F. Flejou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Lecomte.

About this article

Cite this article

Lecomte, T., Vaillant, E. & Flejou, J.F. Comment défendre le point de vue de l’endoscopiste dans une réunion de concertation pluridisciplinaire ?. Acta Endosc 43, 335–338 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10190-013-0356-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10190-013-0356-7

Search

Navigation