Skip to main content
Log in

Échoponctions diagnostiques et thérapeutiques: nouvelles aiguilles, nouvelles techniques

EUS-FNA: new needles and new techniques

  • Vidéo-Digest
  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. Larghi A, Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Monges G, Petrone MC, Rindi G, et al. Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Larghi A, Giovannini M, Petrone MC, Abdulkader I, et al. Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:1189–1196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Iwashita T, Nakai Y, Samarasena JB, Park do H, Zhang Z, Gu M, et al. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2013;77:909–915.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Trevino J, Ramesh J, Varadarajulu S. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:321–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S. Assessment of the technical performance of the flexible 19-gauge EUS-FNA needle. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:336–343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bang JY, Ramesh J, Trevino J, Eloubeidi MA, Varadarajulu S. Objective assessment of an algorithmic approach to EUS-guided FNA and interventions. Gastrointest Endosc 2013;77:739–744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khashab MA, Fujii LL, Baron TH, Canto MI, Gostout CJ, Petersen BT, et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage for patients with malignant biliary obstruction with an indwelling duodenal stent (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:209–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Giovannini M, Bories E. EUS-guided biliary drainage. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012;2012:348719.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. von Renteln D, Quaas A, Rosch T, Denzer UW, Szyrach MN, Enderle MD, et al. A novel flexible cryoprobe for EUS-guided pancreatic biopsies. Gastrointest Endosc 2013;77:784–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bang JY, Magee SH, Ramesh J, Trevino JM, Varadarajulu S. Randomized trial comparing fanning with standard technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Endoscopy 2013;45:445–450.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakai Y, Isayama H, Yamamoto N, Kawahata S, Saito T, Watanabe T, et al. A comparative study of suction technique vs slow pull technique in EUS-FNA for pancreatic malignant lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2013;77(Suppl):AB404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aziz Aadam A, Oh Y, Latif S, Khan AH, Venu M, Schiro A, et al. Eliminating the residual negative pressure in the EUS-FNA needle before withdrawal enhances the FNA cytology yield. Gastrointest Endosc 2013;77(Suppl):AB179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Konda VJ, Aslanian HR, Wallace MB, Siddiqui UD, Hart J, Waxman I. First assessment of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy during EUS-FNA procedures of the pancreas (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:1049–1060.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Napoleon B, Pujol B, Lemaistre AI, Caillol F, Lucidarme D, Filoche B, et al. In vivo characterization of pancreatic serous cystadenomas by needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE). Intra-and interobserver agreement — contact study. Gastroenterology 2013;144(Suppl)1S-797S.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Itoi T, Binmoeller KF, Shah J, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Kurihara T, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel lumen-apposing metal stent for endosonography-guided pancreatic pseudocyst and gallbladder drainage (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:870–876.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shah RJ, Shah JN, Waxman I, Kowalski TE, Sanchez-Yague A, Nieto J, et al. EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PP) utilizing a novel anchoring, Covered Self-Expanding Metal Stent (Acsems): results from a prospective, multi-center study. Gastroenterol Endosc 2013;77(Suppl 1):AB128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Arcidiacono PG, Carrara S, Reni M, Petrone MC, Cappio S, Balzano G, et al. Feasibility and safety of EUS-guided cryothermal ablation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:1142–1151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jin Z, Chang KJ. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fiducial markers and brachytherapy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2012;22:325–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Vanbiervliet.

About this article

Cite this article

Vanbiervliet, G., Napoléon, B. Échoponctions diagnostiques et thérapeutiques: nouvelles aiguilles, nouvelles techniques. Acta Endosc 43, 331–334 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10190-013-0353-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10190-013-0353-x

Navigation