Phillips-Perron-type unit root tests in the nonlinear ESTAR framework

Summary

In this paper, we propose Phillips-Perron type, semi-parametric testing procedures to distinguish a unit root process from a mean-reverting exponential smooth transition autoregressive one. The limiting nonstandard distributions are derived under very general conditions and simulation evidence shows that the tests perform better than the standard Phillips-Perron or Dickey-Fuller tests in the region of the null.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Andrews, D. W. K., Monahan, J. C. (1992). An improved heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimator.Econometrica 60 953–966.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews, D. W. K., Ploberger, W. (1994). Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative.Econometrica 62 1383–1414.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baum, C. F., Barkoulas, J. T., Caglayan, M. (2001). Nonlinear adjustment to purchasing power parity in the post-Bretton Woods era.Journal of International Money and Finance 20 379–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davies, R. (1987). Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative.Biometrika 74 33–43.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Den Haan, W., Levin, A. (1997). A practitioner’s guide to robust covariance matrix estimation. InHandbook of Statistics 15 (G. Maddala and C. Rao, eds.), 299–342. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dumas, B. (1992). Dynamic equilibrium and the real exchange rate in a spatially separated world.Review of Financial Studies 5 153–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen, B. E. (1992). Convergence to stochastic integrals for dependent heterogeneous processes.Econometric Theory 8 489–500.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen, B. E. (1996). Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified under the null hypothesis.Econometrica 64 413–430.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y. andSnell, A. (2003). Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear star framework.Journal of Econometrics 112 359–379.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Luukkonen, R., Saikkonen, P., Teräsvirta, T. (1988). Testing linearity against smooth transition autoregressive models.Biometrika 75 491–499.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McLeish, D. L. (1975). A maximal inequality and dependent strong laws.Annals of Probability 3 829–839.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Michael, P., Nobay, A. R., Peel, D. A. (1997). Transactions costs and nonlinear adjustment in real exchange rates: An empirical investigation.Journal of Political Economy 105 862–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Perron, P. andNg, S. (1996). Useful modifications to some unit root tests with dependent errors and their local asymptotic properties.Review of Economic Studies 63 435–463.

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Phillips, P. C. B. (1987). Time series regression with a unit root.Econometrica 55 277–301.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Phillips, P. C. B., Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression.Biometrika 75 335–346.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Phillips, P. C. B., Xiao, Z. (1998). A primer on unit root testing.Journal of Economic Surveys 12 423–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Said, S., Dickey, D. (1984). Testing for unit roots in autoregressive moving average of unknown order.Biometrika 71 559–607.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sarno, L. (2000). Real exchange rate behavior in the middle east: A reexamination.Economics Letters 66, 127–136.

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sercu, P., Uppal, R., van Hulle, C. (1995). The exchange rate in the presence of transaction costs: Implications for tests of purchasing power parity.Journal of Finance 50 1309–1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor, M. P., Peel, D., Sarno, L. (2001). Nonlinear mean-reversion in real exchange rates: Towards a solution to the purchasing power parity puzzles.International Economic Review 42 1015–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. van Dijk, D., Teräsvirta, T., Franses, P. H. (2002). Smooth transition autoregressive models—A survey of recent developments.Econometric Reviews 21 1–47.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We would like to thank conference participants of the Pfingsttagung 2005 in Münster for their helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rothe, C., Sibbertsen, P. Phillips-Perron-type unit root tests in the nonlinear ESTAR framework. Allgemeines Statistisches Arch 90, 439–456 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-006-0244-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Exponential smooth transition autoregressive model
  • unit roots
  • Monte Carlo simulations
  • purchasing power parity

JEL

  • C12
  • C32