Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mid-term results of joint-preserving procedures by a modified Mann method for big toe deformities in rheumatoid patients undergoing forefoot surgeries

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modern Rheumatology

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate joint-preserving procedures by a modified Mann method for rheumatoid forefoot deformities and their functional outcomes in the mid-term. Eleven feet in seven patients underwent forefoot surgery using a modified Mann method for the big toe, combined with offset osteotomy or resection arthroplasty of the lesser toes. The mean follow-up period was 3.6 years. The mean score on the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot scale for rheumatoid arthritis foot and ankle joints improved from 44.0 to 72.0. The mean hallux valgus angle improved from 39.4° to 20.5° and the mean M1M5 angle improved from 31.1° to 25.8°. However, deformities involving a hallux valgus angle of more than 25.0° recurred in three feet at the latest follow-up, although the patients did not complain of any symptoms from the recurrence. Improvement in the Sharp score for joint space narrowing was observed in the big toe, indicating better congruity of the metatarsophalangeal joint. For restraint of rheumatoid forefoot deformities, a modified Mann method, combined with offset osteotomy or resection arthroplasty, was satisfactory for not only improving the foot function, but also preserving the metatarsophalangeal joint mobility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coughlin MJ. Rheumatoid forefoot reconstruction. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:322–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vanio K. The rheumatoid foot: a clinical study with pathologic and roentgenological comments. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1956;45:1–107.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Farrow SJ, Kingsley GH, Scott DL. Interventions for foot disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53:593–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hasselo LG, Willkens RF, Toomey HE, Karges DE, Hansen ST. Forefoot surgery in rheumatoid arthritis: subjective assessment of outcome. Foot Ankle. 1987;8:148–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mann RA. Adult hallux valgus, arthritides. In: Caughlin MJ, Mann RA, editors. Surgery of Foot and Ankle. 7th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1999. p. 151–269 (see also pp 560–650).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lipsky PE, van der Heijde DM, St Clair EW, Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, et al. Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-tumor necrosis factor trial in rheumatoid arthritis with concomitant therapy study group. N Engl J Med. 2000;30:1594–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goekoop-Ruiterman YP, de Vries-Bouwstra JK, Allaart CF, van Zeben D, Kerstens PJ, Hazes JM, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:3381–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, Bombardier C, Furst D, Goldsmith C, et al. Preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38:27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Takakubo Y, Takagi M, Orui H, Sasaki A, Kiyoshige Y, Ogino T. Middle-term result of arthroplasty for rheumatoid forefoot deformities with non-weight bearing brace of forefoot (in Japanese). Jpn J Joint Dis. 2008;27:153–61.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Niki H, Aoki H, Inokuchi S, Ozeki S, Kinoshita M, Kura H, et al. Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders II: interclinician and intraclinician reliability and validity of the newly established standard rating scales and Japanese Orthopaedic Association rating scale. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10:466–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharp JT, Young DY, Bluhm GB, Brook A, Brower AC, Corbett M, et al. How many joints in the hands and wrists should be included in a score of radiologic abnormalities used to assess rheumatoid arthritis? Arthritis Rheum. 1985;28:1326–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Larsen A, Dale K, Eek M. Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films. Acta Radiol Diagn. 1977;18:481–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mulcahy D, Daniels TR, Lau JT, Boyle E, Bogoch E. Rheumatoid forefoot deformity: a comparison study of 2 functional methods of reconstruction. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:1440–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas S, Kinninmonth AW, Kumar CS. Long-term results of the modified Hoffman procedure in the rheumatoid forefoot surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:149–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamalainen M, Raunio P. Long-term followup of rheumatoid forefoot surgery. Clin Orthop. 1997;340:34–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Torikai E, Kageyama Y, Suzuki M, Ichikawa T, Nagano A. Comparison between resection arthroplasty alone and resection arthroplasty with arthrodesis of the first MTP joint for rheumatoid forefoot deformities. Mod Rheumatol. 2008;18:486–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Heijden KW, Rasker JJ, Jacobs JW, Dey K. Kates forefoot arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. A 5-year follow-up study. J Rheumatol. 1992;19:1545–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hattori H, Mibe J, Nohara A, Yamamoto K. IP course of damage to the hallux over 5 years after forefoot resection arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Int Orthop. 2007;31:477–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thordarson DB, Aval S, Krieger L. Failure of hallux MP preservation surgery for rheumatoid arthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:486–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barouk LS, Barouk P. Joint-preserving surgery in rheumatoid forefoot: preliminary study with more-than-two-year follow-up. Foot Ankle Clin. 2007;12:435–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Veri JP, Pirani SP, Claridge R. Crescentic proximal metatarsal osteotomy for moderate to severe hallux valgus: a mean 12.2 year follow-up study. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:817–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zembsch A, Trnka HJ, Ritschl P. Correction of hallux valgus metatarsal osteotomy versus excision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2000;376:183–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hicks JH. The mechanics of the foot II. The plantar aponeurosis and the arch. J Anat. 1954;88:25–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuya Takakubo.

About this article

Cite this article

Takakubo, Y., Takagi, M., Tamaki, Y. et al. Mid-term results of joint-preserving procedures by a modified Mann method for big toe deformities in rheumatoid patients undergoing forefoot surgeries. Mod Rheumatol 20, 147–153 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10165-009-0253-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10165-009-0253-2

Keywords

Navigation