Abstract
The exchange of prosocial behaviors such as grooming may be affected by several factors, including the social structure and social relationships of the individuals. However, studies on the reciprocity of prosocial affiliative behaviors in non-primate animals are limited. Flipper rubbing is considered a prosocial affiliative behavior in dolphins. We investigated the reciprocity of flipper rubbing and tested the following hypotheses in common bottlenose dolphins: trade for tolerance, trade for a reduction in renewed aggressions, the value of flipper rubbing partner, and reciprocity over short and long time frames. There was no correlation between the frequency of flipper rubbing and aggression. Age difference did not affect reciprocal flipper rubbing. Flipper rubbing by former opponents did not increase after aggression. Dolphins did not provide flipper rubbing immediately after receiving flipper rubbing. The exchange of flipper rubbing was more reciprocal over long time frames than over short time frames. Dolphins preferentially rubbed the individuals who rubbed them the most. Pairs who performed flipper rubbing more frequently partook in more reciprocal flipper rubbing than pairs who performed flipper rubbing less frequently. Results suggest that bottlenose dolphins maintain flipper rubbing reciprocity over the long-term via partner choice based on an emotional bookkeeping system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adiseshan A, Adiseshan T, Isbell LA (2011) Affiliative relationships and reciprocity among adult male bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata) at Arunachala Hill, India. Am J Primatol 73:1107–1113. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20987
Akinyi MY, Tung J, Jeneby M et al (2013) Role of grooming in reducing tick load in wild baboons (Papio cynocephalus). Anim Behav 85:559–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.12.012
Aureli F, Preston SD, de Waal FBM (1999) Heart rate responses to social interactions in free-moving rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): a pilot study. J Comp Psychol 113:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.113.1.59
Barrett L, Henzi SP (2002) Constraints on relationship formation among female primates. Behaviour 139:263–289
Barrett L, Henzi SP, Weingrill T et al (1999) Market forces predict grooming reciprocity in female baboons. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 266:665–670. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0687
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Batson CD (1998) Altruism and prosocial behavior. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G (eds) The handbook of social psychology. McGraw-Hill, pp 282–316
Boccia ML, Reite M, Laudenslager M (1989) On the physiology of grooming in a pigtail macaque. Physiol Behav 45:667–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(89)90089-9
Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2002) A proximate perspective on reciprocal altruism. Hum Nat 13:129–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-002-1017-2
Chancellor RL, Isbell LA (2009) Female grooming markets in a population of gray-cheeked mangabeys (Lophocebus albigena). Behav Ecol 20:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn117
Connor R, Wells RS (2000) The bottlenose dolphin: Social relationships in a fission-fusion society. In: Mann J, Connor RC, Tyack PL, Whitehead H (eds) Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. The University of Chicago Press, Chikago, pp 91–126
de Waal FBM, Luttrell LM (1989) Toward a comparative socioecology of the genus Macaca: different dominance styles in rhesus and stumptail monkeys. Am J Primatol 19:83–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.1350190203
de Waal FBM, Ren R (1988) Comparison of the reconciliation behavior of stumptail and rhesus macaques. Ethology 78:129–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1988.tb00224.x
de Waal FBM, Yoshihara D (1983) Reconciliation and redirected affection in rhesus monkeys. Behaviour 85:224–241
Dudzinski K, Ribic C (2017) Pectoral fin contact as a mechanism for social bonding among dolphins. Anim Behav Cogn 4:30–48. https://doi.org/10.12966/abc.03.02.2017
Dunbar RIM (1991) Functional significance of social grooming in primates. Folia Primatol 57:121–131. https://doi.org/10.1159/000156574
Fox J, Weisberg S (2019) An R companion to applied regression. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Gomes CM, Mundry R, Boesch C (2009) Long-term reciprocation of grooming in wild west African chimpanzees. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:699–706. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1324
Grellier K, Hammond PS, Wilson B et al (2003) Use of photo-identification data to quantify mother–calf association patterns in bottlenose dolphins. Can J Zool 81:1421–1427. https://doi.org/10.1139/z03-132
Hart BL, Hart LA (1992) Reciprocal allogrooming in impala, Aepyceros melampus. Anim Behav 44:1073–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80319-7
Hemelrijk CK (1990) Models of, and tests for, reciprocity, unidirectionality and other social interaction patterns at a group level. Anim Behav 39:1013–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80775-4
Henazi SP, Barrett L (1999) The value of grooming to female primates. Primates 40:47–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557701
Holobinko A, Waring GH (2010) Conflict and reconciliation behavior trends of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Zoo Biol 29:567–585. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20293
Hothorn T, Hornik K (2019) exactRankTests: exact distributions for rank and permutation tests. In: R Packag. version 0.8-31
Kutsukake N, Clutton-Brock TH (2006) Social functions of allogrooming in cooperatively breeding meerkats. Anim Behav 72:1059–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.02.016
Kutsukake N, Clutton-Brock TH (2010) Grooming and the value of social relationships in cooperatively breeding meerkats. Anim Behav 79:271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.10.014
Leinfelder I, de Vries H, Deleu R, Nelissen M (2001) Rank and grooming reciprocity among females in a mixed-sex group of captive hamadryas baboons. Am J Primatol 55:25–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.1036
Lusseau D, Schneider K, Boisseau OJ et al (2003) The bottlenose dolphin community of doubtful sound features a large proportion of long-lasting associations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:396–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0651-y
Mann J, Smuts B (1999) Behavioral development in wild bottlenose dolphin newborns (Tursiops sp.). Behaviour 136:529–566
Marley S, Cheney B, Thompson PM (2013) Using tooth rakes to monitor population and sex differences in aggressive behaviour in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Aquat Mamm 39:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.39.2.2013.107
Matoba T, Kutsukake N, Hasegawa T (2013) Head rubbing and licking reinforce social bonds in a group of captive African lions, Panthera Leo. PLoS ONE 8:e73044. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073044
McHugh KA, Allen JB, Barleycorn AA, Wells RS (2011) Severe Karenia brevis red tides influence juvenile bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) behavior in Sarasota Bay, Florida. Mar Mamm Sci 27:622–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00428.x
Mitani JC (2009) Male chimpanzees form enduring and equitable social bonds. Anim Behav 77:633–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.11.021
Muggeo VM (2008) Segmented: an R package to fit regression models with broken-line relationships. R News 8:20–25
Newton-Fisher NE, Lee PC (2011) Grooming reciprocity in wild male chimpanzees. Anim Behav 81:439–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.015
Nishida T (1988) Development of social grooming between mother and offspring in wild chimpanzees. Folia Primatol 50:109–123. https://doi.org/10.1159/000156335
Noë R, Hammerstein P (1995) Biological markets. Trends Ecol Evol 10:336–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89123-5
Port M, Clough D, Kappeler PM (2009) Market effects offset the reciprocation of grooming in free-ranging redfronted lemurs, Eulemur fulvus rufus. Anim Behav 77:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.032
R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Found Stat Comput
Radford AN, Du Plessis MA (2006) Dual function of allopreening in the cooperatively breeding green woodhoopoe, Phoeniculus purpureus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:221–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0253-6
Sakai M, Hishii T, Takeda S, Kohshima S (2006) Flipper rubbing behaviors in wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus). Mar Mamm Sci 22:966–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2006.00082.x
Sakai M, Morisaka T, Iwasaki M et al (2013) Mother–calf interactions and social behavior development in Commerson’s dolphins (Cephalorhynchus commersonii). J Ethol 31:305–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-013-0380-2
Samuels A, Gifford T (1997) A quantitative assessment of dominance relations among bottlenose dolphins. Mar Mamm Sci 13:70–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1997.tb00613.x
Schino G, Aureli F (2009) Reciprocal altruism in primates: partner choice, cognition, and emotions. Adv Study Behav 39:45–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(09)39002-6
Schino G, Aureli F (2010) The relative roles of kinship and reciprocity in explaining primate altruism. Ecol Lett 13:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01396.x
Schino G, Pellegrini B (2009) Grooming in mandrills and the time frame of reciprocal partner choice. Am J Primatol 71:884–888. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20719
Schino G, Di Giuseppe F, Visalberghi E (2009) The time frame of partner choice in the grooming reciprocation of Cebus apella. Ethology 115:70–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01581.x
Scott EM, Mann J, Watson-Capps JJ et al (2005) Aggression in bottlenose dolphins: evidence for sexual coercion, male-male competition, and female tolerance through analysis of tooth-rake marks and behaviour. Behaviour 142:21–44
Serres A, Hao Y, Wang D (2019) Agonistic interactions and dominance relationships in three groups of captive odontocetes: method of assessment and inter-species/group comparison. Aquat Mamm 45:478–499. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.45.5.2019.478
Seyfarth RM (1977) A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys. J Theor Biol 65:671–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(77)90015-7
Silk J, Cheney D, Seyfarth R (1999) The structure of social relationships among female savanna baboons in Moremi Reserve, Botswana. Behaviour 136:679–703
Silk JB, Alberts SC, Altmann J (2006) Social relationships among adult female baboons (Papio cynocephalus) II. Variation in the quality and stability of social bonds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:197–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0250-9
Stopka P, Graciasová R (2001) Conditional allogrooming in the herb-field mouse. Behav Ecol 12:584–589. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/12.5.584
Tamaki N, Morisaka T, Taki M (2006) Does body contact contribute towards repairing relationships? Behav Process 73:209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2006.05.010
Tanaka I, Talefushi H (1993) Elimination of external parasites (lice) is the primary function of grooming in free-ranging Japanese macaques. Anthropol Sci 101:187–193. https://doi.org/10.1537/ase.101.187
Watts DP (2002) Reciprocity and interchange in the social relationships of wild male chimpanzees. Behaviour 139:343–370
Weaver A (2003) Conflict and reconciliation in captive bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus. Mar Mamm Sci 19:836–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2003.tb01134.x
Wells RS (1991) The role of long-term study in understanding the social structure of a bottlenose dolphin community. In: Pryor K, Norris KS (eds) Dolphin societies: discoveries and puzzles. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 199–225
Wells RS, Scott MD, Irvine AB (1987) The social structure of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins. Current mammalogy. Springer US, Boston, pp 247–305
Whitehead H (2009) SOCPROG programs: analysing animal social structures. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:765–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0697-y
Yamamoto C, Morisaka T, Furuta K et al (2015) Post-conflict affiliation as conflict management in captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Sci Rep 5:14275. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14275
Yamamoto C, Ishibashi T, Yoshida A, Amano M (2016) Effect of valuable relationship on reconciliation and initiator of reconciliation in captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). J Ethol 34:147–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-016-0459-7
Yamamoto C, Ishibashi T, Kashiwagi N, Amano M (2020) Functions of post-conflict bystander affiliations toward aggressors and victims in bottlenose dolphins. Sci Rep 10:3776. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60423-6
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the member of Shimonoseki Aquarium for their help with our study. We thank Tadamichi Morisaka and Mai Sakai for providing helpful comments.
Funding
This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant number 17J02427.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Our observation adhered to the Code of Ethics issued by the Japanese Association of Zoos and Aquariums. The institutional guidelines for care of animals were followed. This study approved by Shimonoseki Marine Science Museum.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Yamamoto, C., Ishibashi, T. Flipper rubbing reciprocity and partner choice in common bottlenose dolphins. J Ethol 40, 49–59 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-021-00729-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-021-00729-8