Skip to main content

Carpe diem: winner and loser effects are constrained to same-day competitions in collegiate baseball

Abstract

Competitive outcomes can be significantly influenced by previous experience of winning and losing, whereby all things considered, winners are likely to continue winning and losers are likely to keep losing. Although short-lived, the underlying hormonal changes associated with these effects have been observed into the following day. Here, we assess the functional persistence of winner and loser effects in college baseball by investigating outcomes (splits vs. sweeps) of multigame series played over one or more days. Results show that sweeps occur at disproportionately higher frequencies in single-day series, but drop off to expected levels for multiday series.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Data availability

The data sets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available at https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cnso_bio_datasets/3/.

References

  • Apicella CL, Dreber A, Mollerstrom J (2014) Salivary testosterone change following monetary wins and losses predicts future financial risk-taking. Psychoneuroendocrinology 39:58–64

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnott G, Elwood RW (2008) Information gathering and decision making about resource value in animal contests. Anim Behav 76(3):529–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth A, Shelley G, Mazur A, Tharp G, Kittok R (1989) Testosterone, and winning and losing in human competition. Horm Behav 23(4):556–571

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carré JM, Putnam SK (2010) Watching a previous victory produces an increase in testosterone among elite hockey players. Psychoneuroendocrinology 35(3):475–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carré JM, Campbell JA, Lozoya E, Goetz SM, Welker KM (2013) Changes in testosterone mediate the effect of winning on subsequent aggressive behaviour. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38(10):2034–2041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook CJ, Crewther BT (2012a) The effects of different pre-game motivational interventions on athlete free hormonal state and subsequent performance in professional rugby union matches. Physiol Behav 106(5):683–688

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook CJ, Crewther BT (2012b) Changes in salivary testosterone concentrations and subsequent voluntary squat performance following the presentation of short video clips. Horm Behav 61(1):17–22

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett TW, Johnstone RA (2010) Learning your own strength: winner and loser effects should change with age and experience. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 277(1686):1427–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuxjager MJ, Mast G, Becker EA, Marler CA (2009) The ‘home advantage’is necessary for a full winner effect and changes in post-encounter testosterone. Horm Behav 56(2):214–219

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup AC, Deaner RO (2021) A Darwinian approach to the study of sports, games, and athletics. Evol Behav Sci 15(2):89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup AC, Eldakar OT (2014) Winner and loser effects in major league baseball double headers. Hum Ethol Bull 29(4):18

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup AC, Eldakar OT, Schonning M, Yanchus M (2018) Winner and loser effects in collegiate baseball and softball doubleheaders. Adapt Hum Behav Physiol 4(1):108–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geniole SN, Bird BM, Ruddick EL, Carré JM (2017) Effects of competition outcome on testosterone concentrations in humans: an updated meta-analysis. Horm Behav 92:37–50

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstein P (1981) The role of asymmetries in animal contests. Anim Behav 29(1):193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy IC, Briffa M (2013) (Eds) Animal contests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Hsu Y, Wolf LL (1999) The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Anim Behav 57(4):903–910

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasumovic MM, Elias DO, Sivalinghem S, Mason AC, Andrade MC (2010) Examination of prior contest experience and the retention of winner and loser effects. Behav Ecol 21(2):404–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp DJ, Wiklund C (2004) Residency effects in animal contests. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 271(1549):1707–1711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerksick CM, Wilborn CD, Roberts MD, Smith-Ryan A, Kleiner SM, Jäger R, Collin R, Cooke M, Davis JN, Galvan E, Greenwood M, Lowery LM, Wildman R, Antonio J, Kreider RB (2018) ISSN exercise & sports nutrition review update: research & recommendations. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 15(1):1–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, López-Sepulcre A, Morrell LJ (2006) From hawks and doves to self-consistent games of territorial behavior. Am Nat 167(6):901–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marler CA, Oyegbile TO, Plavicki J, Trainor BC (2005) Response to Wingfield’s commentary on “A continuing saga: the role of testosterone in aggression.” Horm Behav 48(3):256–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur A, Booth A, Dabbs JM Jr (1992) Testosterone and chess competition. Soc Psychol Q 55:70–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta PH, Snyder NA, Knight EL, Lassetter B (2015) Close versus decisive victory moderates the effect of testosterone change on competitive decisions and task enjoyment. Adapt Hum Behav Physiol 1(3):291–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave N, Wolfson S (2003) Testosterone, territoriality, and the ‘home advantage.’ Physiol Behav 78(2):269–275

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira T, Gouveia MJ, Oliveira RF (2009) Testosterone responsiveness to winning and losing experiences in female soccer players. Psychoneuroendocrino 34(7):1056–1064

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page L, Coates J (2017) Winner and loser effects in human competitions. Evidence from equally matched tennis players. Evol Hum Behav 38(4):530–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J Theor Biol 47(1):223–243

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutte C, Taborsky M, Brinkhof MW (2006) What sets the odds of winning and losing? Trends Ecol Evol 21(1):16–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacchi R, Pupin F, Gentilli A, Rubolini D, Scali S, Fasola M, Galeotti P (2009) Male–male combats in a polymorphic lizard: residency and size, but not color, affect fighting rules and contest outcome. Aggress Behav 35(3):274–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuett GW, Harlow HJ, Rose JD, Van Kirk EA, Murdoch WJ (1996) Levels of plasma corticosterone and testosterone in male copperheads (Agkistrodon contortrix) following staged fights. Horm Behav 30(1):60–68

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JM (1974) The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. J Theor Biol 47(1):209–221

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JM (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trainor BC, Bird IM, Marler CA (2004) Opposing hormonal mechanisms of aggression revealed through short-lived testosterone manipulations and multiple winning experiences. Horm Behav 45(2):115–121

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingfield JC (1994) Regulation of territorial behavior in the sedentary song sparrow, Melospiza melodia morphna. Horm Behav 28(1):1–15

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zilioli S, Watson NV (2014) Testosterone across successive competitions: evidence for a ‘winner effect’ in humans? Psychoneuroendocrinology 47:1–9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the J. Tartar, J. Antonio, and the rest of the Neurosports team, as well as J. Thomas, C. Algieri, and T. Hazelhurtst for the helpful insights and discussions.

Funding

There was no funding provided for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omar Tonsi Eldakar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eldakar, O.T., Buckwold, N. & Gallup, A.C. Carpe diem: winner and loser effects are constrained to same-day competitions in collegiate baseball. J Ethol 40, 97–101 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-021-00728-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-021-00728-9

Keywords

  • Stress
  • Sport psychology
  • Testosterone
  • Dominance
  • Home field advantage
  • Human performance