Abstract
Competitive outcomes can be significantly influenced by previous experience of winning and losing, whereby all things considered, winners are likely to continue winning and losers are likely to keep losing. Although short-lived, the underlying hormonal changes associated with these effects have been observed into the following day. Here, we assess the functional persistence of winner and loser effects in college baseball by investigating outcomes (splits vs. sweeps) of multigame series played over one or more days. Results show that sweeps occur at disproportionately higher frequencies in single-day series, but drop off to expected levels for multiday series.
Data availability
The data sets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available at https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cnso_bio_datasets/3/.
References
Apicella CL, Dreber A, Mollerstrom J (2014) Salivary testosterone change following monetary wins and losses predicts future financial risk-taking. Psychoneuroendocrinology 39:58–64
Arnott G, Elwood RW (2008) Information gathering and decision making about resource value in animal contests. Anim Behav 76(3):529–542
Booth A, Shelley G, Mazur A, Tharp G, Kittok R (1989) Testosterone, and winning and losing in human competition. Horm Behav 23(4):556–571
Carré JM, Putnam SK (2010) Watching a previous victory produces an increase in testosterone among elite hockey players. Psychoneuroendocrinology 35(3):475–479
Carré JM, Campbell JA, Lozoya E, Goetz SM, Welker KM (2013) Changes in testosterone mediate the effect of winning on subsequent aggressive behaviour. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38(10):2034–2041
Cook CJ, Crewther BT (2012a) The effects of different pre-game motivational interventions on athlete free hormonal state and subsequent performance in professional rugby union matches. Physiol Behav 106(5):683–688
Cook CJ, Crewther BT (2012b) Changes in salivary testosterone concentrations and subsequent voluntary squat performance following the presentation of short video clips. Horm Behav 61(1):17–22
Fawcett TW, Johnstone RA (2010) Learning your own strength: winner and loser effects should change with age and experience. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 277(1686):1427–1434
Fuxjager MJ, Mast G, Becker EA, Marler CA (2009) The ‘home advantage’is necessary for a full winner effect and changes in post-encounter testosterone. Horm Behav 56(2):214–219
Gallup AC, Deaner RO (2021) A Darwinian approach to the study of sports, games, and athletics. Evol Behav Sci 15(2):89
Gallup AC, Eldakar OT (2014) Winner and loser effects in major league baseball double headers. Hum Ethol Bull 29(4):18
Gallup AC, Eldakar OT, Schonning M, Yanchus M (2018) Winner and loser effects in collegiate baseball and softball doubleheaders. Adapt Hum Behav Physiol 4(1):108–120
Geniole SN, Bird BM, Ruddick EL, Carré JM (2017) Effects of competition outcome on testosterone concentrations in humans: an updated meta-analysis. Horm Behav 92:37–50
Hammerstein P (1981) The role of asymmetries in animal contests. Anim Behav 29(1):193–205
Hardy IC, Briffa M (2013) (Eds) Animal contests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hsu Y, Wolf LL (1999) The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Anim Behav 57(4):903–910
Kasumovic MM, Elias DO, Sivalinghem S, Mason AC, Andrade MC (2010) Examination of prior contest experience and the retention of winner and loser effects. Behav Ecol 21(2):404–409
Kemp DJ, Wiklund C (2004) Residency effects in animal contests. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 271(1549):1707–1711
Kerksick CM, Wilborn CD, Roberts MD, Smith-Ryan A, Kleiner SM, Jäger R, Collin R, Cooke M, Davis JN, Galvan E, Greenwood M, Lowery LM, Wildman R, Antonio J, Kreider RB (2018) ISSN exercise & sports nutrition review update: research & recommendations. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 15(1):1–57
Kokko H, López-Sepulcre A, Morrell LJ (2006) From hawks and doves to self-consistent games of territorial behavior. Am Nat 167(6):901–912
Marler CA, Oyegbile TO, Plavicki J, Trainor BC (2005) Response to Wingfield’s commentary on “A continuing saga: the role of testosterone in aggression.” Horm Behav 48(3):256–258
Mazur A, Booth A, Dabbs JM Jr (1992) Testosterone and chess competition. Soc Psychol Q 55:70–77
Mehta PH, Snyder NA, Knight EL, Lassetter B (2015) Close versus decisive victory moderates the effect of testosterone change on competitive decisions and task enjoyment. Adapt Hum Behav Physiol 1(3):291–311
Neave N, Wolfson S (2003) Testosterone, territoriality, and the ‘home advantage.’ Physiol Behav 78(2):269–275
Oliveira T, Gouveia MJ, Oliveira RF (2009) Testosterone responsiveness to winning and losing experiences in female soccer players. Psychoneuroendocrino 34(7):1056–1064
Page L, Coates J (2017) Winner and loser effects in human competitions. Evidence from equally matched tennis players. Evol Hum Behav 38(4):530–535
Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J Theor Biol 47(1):223–243
Rutte C, Taborsky M, Brinkhof MW (2006) What sets the odds of winning and losing? Trends Ecol Evol 21(1):16–21
Sacchi R, Pupin F, Gentilli A, Rubolini D, Scali S, Fasola M, Galeotti P (2009) Male–male combats in a polymorphic lizard: residency and size, but not color, affect fighting rules and contest outcome. Aggress Behav 35(3):274–283
Schuett GW, Harlow HJ, Rose JD, Van Kirk EA, Murdoch WJ (1996) Levels of plasma corticosterone and testosterone in male copperheads (Agkistrodon contortrix) following staged fights. Horm Behav 30(1):60–68
Smith JM (1974) The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. J Theor Biol 47(1):209–221
Smith JM (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Trainor BC, Bird IM, Marler CA (2004) Opposing hormonal mechanisms of aggression revealed through short-lived testosterone manipulations and multiple winning experiences. Horm Behav 45(2):115–121
Wingfield JC (1994) Regulation of territorial behavior in the sedentary song sparrow, Melospiza melodia morphna. Horm Behav 28(1):1–15
Zilioli S, Watson NV (2014) Testosterone across successive competitions: evidence for a ‘winner effect’ in humans? Psychoneuroendocrinology 47:1–9
Acknowledgements
We thank the J. Tartar, J. Antonio, and the rest of the Neurosports team, as well as J. Thomas, C. Algieri, and T. Hazelhurtst for the helpful insights and discussions.
Funding
There was no funding provided for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Eldakar, O.T., Buckwold, N. & Gallup, A.C. Carpe diem: winner and loser effects are constrained to same-day competitions in collegiate baseball. J Ethol 40, 97–101 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-021-00728-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-021-00728-9