Shorter-legged males start breeding earlier in the barn swallow

Abstract

Many sexual selection studies focus on conspicuous ornaments, such as long tails, but neglect to investigate inconspicuous traits. Here, we studied a well-known sexual selection mechanism, the Darwin–Fisher mechanism (i.e., breeding date selection), in relation to tarsus length in male barn swallows Hirundo rustica, a model species for sexual selection. When controlling for body size, we found that males with shorter tarsi started breeding earlier than those with longer tarsi. The current study indicates a selective advantage of short-legged males, explaining the reversed sexual dimorphism in tarsus length in this short-legged species.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to ongoing other studies but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton Univ Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Balmford A, Lewis MJ, De Brooke ML, Thomas ALR, Johnson CN (2000) Experimental analyses of sexual and natural selection on short tails in a polygynous warbler. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1121–1128

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cuervo JJ, Møller AP, de Lope F (2003) Experimental manipulation of tail length in female Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica) affects their future reproductive success. Behav Ecol 14:451–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grüebler MU, Naef-Daenzer B (2010) Fitness consequences of timing of breeding in birds: date effects in the course of a reproductive episode. J Avian Biol 41:282–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hair JF, Andersson RE Jr, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hakkarainen H, Huhta E, Lahti K, Lundvall P, Mappes T, Tolonen P, Wiehn J (1996) A test of male mating and hunting success in the kestrel: the advantages of smallness? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:375–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hasegawa M (2018) Beauty alone is insufficient: female mate choice in the barn swallow. Ecol Res 33:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hasegawa M, Arai E (2016) Female attraction to higher pitched male enticement calls in barn swallows. Ethology 122:430–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hasegawa M, Arai E, Watanabe M, Nakamura M (2010a) Mating advantage of multiple male ornaments in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica gutturalis. Ornithol Sci 9:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hasegawa M, Arai E, Kojima W, Kitamura W, Fujita G, Higuchi H, Watanabe M, Nakamura M (2010b) Low level of extra-pair paternity in a population of the barn swallow Hirundo rustica gutturalis. Ornithol Sci 9:161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hasegawa M, Arai E, Watanabe M, Nakamura M (2012) Female mate choice based on territory quality in barn swallows. J Ethol 30:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hasegawa M, Arai E, Watanabe M, Nakamura M (2014) Male viability is positively related to multiple male ornaments in Asian barn swallow. J Ornithol 155:389–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasegawa M, Arai E, Nakamura M (2018) Experimental manipulation of female tail length did not cause differential allocation by males in the barn swallow. Ethology 124:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heers AM, Dial KP (2015) Wings versus legs in the avian bauplan: development and evolution of alternative locomotor strategies. Evolution 69:305–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kojima W, Kitamura W, Kitajima S, Ito Y, Ueda K, Fujita G, Higuchi H (2009) Female barn swallows gain indirect but not direct benefits through social mate choice. Ethology 115:939–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li N (2016) Male sexually selected traits of the barn swallow Hirundo rustica gutturalis in China. Queen Mary University of London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Matyjasiak P (2013) Timing of arrival from spring migration is associated with flight performance in the migratory barn swallow. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Matyjasiak P, Olejniczak I, Boniecki P, Møller AP (2013) Wing characteristics and spring arrival date in barn swallows Hirundo rustica. Acta Ornithol 48:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Michálková R, Tomášek O, Adámková M, Kreisinger J, Albrecht T (2019) Extra-pair paternity patterns in European barn swallows Hirundo rustica are best explained by male and female age rather than male ornamentation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 73:119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Møller AP (1994) Sexual selection and the barn swallow. Oxford Univ Press

    Google Scholar 

  21. Møller AP, Brohede J, Cuervo JJ, de Lope F, Primmer C (2003) Extrapair paternity in relation to sexual ornamentation, arrival date, and condition in a migratory bird. Behav Ecol 14:707–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Møller AP, Chabi Y, Cuervo JJ, de Lope F, Kilpimaa J, Kose M et al (2006) An analysis of continent-wide patterns of sexual selection in a passerine bird. Evolution 60:856–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Møller AP, Balbontin J, Cuervo JJ, Hermosell IG, del Lope F (2009) Individual differences in protandry, sexual selection, and fitness. Behav Ecol 20:433–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. (Accessed 24 Oct 2020)

  25. Romano A, Constanzo A, Rubolini D, Saino N, Møller AP (2017) Geographical and seasonal variation in the intensity of sexual selection in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica: a meta-analysis. Biol Rev 92:1582–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tajima K, Nakamura M (2003) Response to manipulation of partner contribution: a handicapping experiment in the barn swallow. Ornithol Sci 2:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tazzyman SJ, Iwasa Y, Pomiankowski A (2014) Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection. Evolution 68:216–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Turner AK (2006) The barn swallow. T and AD Poyser

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the residents of Joetsu City and Tsurugi-machi for their kind support and assistance. We also thank Dr. Shumpei Kitamura and his laboratory members in Ishikawa Prefectural University. MH was supported by the Research Fellowship of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS, 15J10000; 19K06850).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MH did most field survey, performed statistical analysis, and wrote the most of the manuscript, EA and MN assisted field survey, provided technical support and improved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaru Hasegawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The permits for animal capture and handling were provided by Niigata Prefecture in Japan (#1) and by Ishikawa Prefecture in Japan (#31-14-1), following the Wildlife Protection and Hunting Management Law.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 60 KB)

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hasegawa, M., Arai, E. & Nakamura, M. Shorter-legged males start breeding earlier in the barn swallow. J Ethol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-021-00708-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hirundo rustica gutturalis
  • Reversed sexual dimorphism
  • Sexual selection
  • Skeletal size
  • Tarsus length