Abstract
The aims of this observational study were to (1) define which animal’s phenotypic characteristics determine social position in the context of a commercial organic farm with mixed herd (horned and non-horned cows) and (2) determine the influence of social position on the time at the feeder. We took the following measurements from 27 dairy cows in lactation: body mass, age, body condition score, body length, withers height, distance between horns, horn circumference and length. Replacement and time at the feeder were recorded for 1 h at the time of supplementation. Dominance values for each animal were calculated and the herd was divided into three social categories: dominant (D), intermediate (I) and subordinate (S). Age, body length and body mass influenced (p < 0.001) dominance value of all animals. The presence of horn influenced (p = 0.034) the dominance value of the I and S animals because it was a unique characteristic of these categories. Dominant (84.3%) and intermediate (75.2%) animals spend more time (p < 0.05) at the feeder than the subordinate (59.5%); however, dominant animals tended (p = 0.093) to spend more time at the feeder than the intermediate animals. The social position of an animal was influenced by its age, body mass and body length, and its social position influenced the time at the feeder.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling. Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2011.585831
Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC et al (2013) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Zeitschrift. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
Aniano L, Ungerfeld R (2016) Time budget of socially high and low ranked pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus) females. North West J Zool 12:58–64
Barroso FG, Alados CL, Boza J (2000) Social hierarchy in the domestic goat: effect on food habits and production. Appl Anim Behav Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00113-1
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Beauchamp G (2006) Phenotypic correlates of scrounging behavior in zebra finches: role of foraging efficiency and dominance. Ethology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01241.x
Beilharz RG, Zeeb K (1982) Social dominance in dairy cattle. Appl Anim Ethol. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(82)90134-1
Bica GS, Machado Filho LCP, Teixeira DL et al (2019a) Time of grain supplementation and social dominance modify feeding behaviour of heifers in rotational grazing systems. Front Vet Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00061
Bica GS, Teixeira DL, Hötzel MJ, Machado Filho LCP (2019b) Social hierarchy and feed supplementation of heifers: line or piles? Appl Anim Behav Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104852
Bonanni R, Cafazzo S, Abis A et al (2017) Age-graded dominance hierarchies and social tolerance in packs of free-ranging dogs. Behav Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx059
Bouissou MF (1972) Influence of body weight and presence of horns on social. Anim Behav 20:474–477
Bouissou MF (1980) Social relationships in domestic cattle under modern management techniques. Bolletino di Zool. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250008009438691
Brasil (2011) IN n° 46, de 6 de outubro de 2011. Estabelece o Regulamento Técnico para os Sistemas Orgânicos de Produção Animal e Vegetal. Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento, Brasília
Bro-Jørgensen J (2007) The intensity of sexual selection predicts weapon size in male bovids. Evolution (N Y). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00111.x
Coimbra PAD, Machado Filho LCP, Hötzel MJ (2012) Effects of social dominance, water trough location and shade availability on drinking behaviour of cows on pasture. Appl Anim Behav Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.04.009
De Vries TJ, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM (2004) Effect of feeding space on the inter-cow distance, aggression, and feeding behavior of free-stall housed lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73293-2
de Vries M, Bokkers EAM, van Reenen CG et al (2015) Housing and management factors associated with indicators of dairy cattle welfare. Prev Vet Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.11.016
Deniz M (2018) Determinação do ranque social de bovinos utilizando o software ETlog. In: Dissertação (Mestrado em Agroecossistemas) Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Microclima e comportamento animal em sistema silvipastoril com núcleos. Florianópolis, Brasil, pp 75–90
Favre M, Martin JGA, Festa-Bianchet M (2008) Determinants and life-history consequences of social dominance in bighorn ewes. Anim Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.07.003
Fiol C, Aguerre M, Carriquiry M, Ungerfeld R (2019) Social dominance affects intake rate and behavioral time budget in pre-pubertal dairy heifers allocated in continuous competitive situations. Animal. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002835
Greter AM, Westerveld RS, Duffield TF et al (2013) Short communication: effects of frequency of feed delivery and bunk space on the feeding behavior of limit-fed dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6012
Hetti Arachchige AD, Fisher AD, Wales WJ et al (2014) Space allowance and barriers influence cow competition for mixed rations fed on a feed-pad between bouts of grazing. J Dairy Sci. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7553
Hötzel MJ, Cardoso CS, Roslindo A, von Keyserlingk MAG (2017) Citizens’ views on the practices of zero-grazing and cow-calf separation in the dairy industry: does providing information increase acceptability? J Dairy Sci. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11933
Hussein A, Al-Marashdeh O, Bryant R, Edwards G (2016) Relationship between social dominance and milk production of dairy cows grazing pasture. In: 2016 Conference: New Zealand Society of Animal Production, pp 69–72
Huzzey JM, DeVries TJ, Valois P, von Keyserlingk MAG (2006) Stocking density and feed barrier design affect the feeding and social behavior of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72075-6
Knierim U, Irrgang N, Roth BA (2015) To be or not to be horned-consequences in cattle. Livest Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.05.014
Kondo S, Hurnik JF (1990) Stabilization of social hierarchy in dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(90)90125-W
Landau HG (1951) On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: I. Effect of inherent characteristics. Bull Math Biophys 13:1–19
Lea AJ, Learn NH, Theus MJ et al (2014) Complex sources of variance in female dominance rank in a nepotistic society. Anim Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.05.019
Lundrigan B (1996) Morphology of horns and fighting behavior in the family bovidae. J Mammal. https://doi.org/10.2307/1382822
Lutz J, Burla JB, Gygax L et al (2019) Horned and dehorned dairy cows differ in the pattern of agonistic interactions investigated under different space allowances. Appl Anim Behav Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.05.008
Mendl M, Held S (2001) Living in groups: an evolutionary perspective. In: Keeling LJ, Gonyou HW (eds) Social behaviour in farm animals. Skara, Sweden, pp 7–31
Menke C, Waiblinger S, Fölsch DW, Wiepkema PR (1999) Social behaviour and injuries of horned cows in loose housing systems. Anim Welf 8:243–258
Menke C, Peer M, Schneider C et al (2015) Introducing structural elements into the free resting area in loose-housing systems with horned dairy cows: effects on lying behaviour and cleanliness. Livest Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.05.015
Pinheiro Machado LC (2010) Pastoreio racional voisin, 2nd edn. Expressão Popular, São Paulo
Preston BT, Stevenson IR, Pemberton JM et al (2003) Overt and covert competition in a promiscuous mammal: the importance of weaponry and testes size to male reproductive success. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2268
Proudfoot K, Habing G (2015) Social stress as a cause of diseases in farm animals: current knowledge and future directions. Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.05.024
R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Rioja-Lang FC, Roberts DJ, Healy SD et al (2012) Dairy cow feeding space requirements assessed in a Y-maze choice test. J Dairy Sci. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4962
Šárová R, Špinka M, Stěhulová I et al (2013) Pay respect to the elders: age, more than body mass, determines dominance in female beef cattle. Anim Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.10.002
Shrader AM, Kerley GIH, Kotler BP, Brown JS (2007) Social information, social feeding, and competition in group-living goats (Capra hircus). Behav Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl057
Takanishi N, Oishi K, Kumagai H et al (2015) Factors influencing the priority of access to food and their effects on the carcass traits for Japanese Black (Wagyu) cattle. Animal. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115001214
Thouless CR (1990) Feeding competition between grazing red deer hinds. Anim Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80669-4
Tidière M, Lemaître JF, Pélabon C et al (2017) Evolutionary allometry reveals a shift in selection pressure on male horn size. J Evol Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13142
Waiblinger S, Baars T, Menke C (2001) Understanding the cow: the central role of human-animal-relationship in keeping dairy cows in loose housing. In: Hovi M, Bouilhol M (eds) Human-animal relationship: stockmanship and housing in organic livestock systems, 4th edn. University of Reading, Clermont-Ferrand, pp 62–78
Yunes MC, von Keyserlingk MAG, Hötzel MJ (2017) Brazilian citizens’ opinions and attitudes about farm animal production systems. Animals. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7100075
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of High Education Personnel) for the scholarship for MD. We thank the CPRA and Evandro M. Richter for the opportunity to perform this work. We thank Deise Martins, Vitória A. B. Riezemberg, and Lidya R. Rodrigues for their help during the experiment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Deniz, M., de Sousa, K.T., do Vale, M.M. et al. Age and body mass are more important than horns to determine the social position of dairy cows. J Ethol 39, 19–27 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-020-00667-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-020-00667-x