Abstract
Several animal taxa exhibit discrete male phenotypes, which are related to alternative mating tactics. In this study, we describe a new male phenotype and mating behavior of the cricket species Macroanaxipha macilenta. The most common male phenotype shows male-biased sexual size dimorphism, with wider forewings than those of the new male phenotype. Wide-forewing males produce longer and louder calling songs than narrow-forewing males, and after attracting a female, the wide-forewing male transfers a spermatophore during a 21-s copulation. On the other hand, narrow-forewing males occur at a low frequency in the population (< 20%), produce short whisper calls, and copulate twice with the female. In each copulation, the narrow-forewing male transfers one spermatophore. The first one is removed and eaten by the female shortly after copulation. Then, if the female stays near the male, they copulate again, and a second spermatophore is transferred to the females’ genitalia. Mating duration in narrow-forewing males can last up to 12 min. Both male morphs may represent alternative mating tactics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander RD, Otte D (1967) The evolution of genitalia and mating behavior in the crickets (Gryllidae) and other orthoptera. Biol Let 133:1–62
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 599
Bleay C, Comendant T, Sinervo B (2007) An experimental test of frequency-dependent selection on male mating strategy in the field. Proc R Soc Lond 274:2019–2025
Cade WH (1981) Alternative male strategies: genetic differences in crickets. Science 212:563–564
Cade WH, Cade ES (1992) Male mating success, calling and searching behavior at high and low densities in the fields cricket, Gryllus integer. Anim Behav 43:49–56
CONANP (2006) Programa de conservación y manejo: Reserva de la biosfera Los Tuxtlas. CONANP, Mexico, p 293
Cueva del Castillo R (2015) Body size, fecundity and sexual size dimorphism in the neotropical cricket Macroanaxipha macilenta (Saussure) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Neotrop Entomol 44:116–122
deCarvalho TN, Shaw KL (2005) Nuptial feeding of spermless spermatophores in the Hawaiian swordtail cricket, Laupala pacifica (Gryllidae: Triginodiinae). Naturwissenschaften 92:483–487
deCarvalho TN, Shaw KL (2010a) Elaborate courtship enhances sperm transfer in the Hawaiian swordtail cricket Laupala cerasina. Anim Behav 79:819–826
deCarvalho TN, Shaw KL (2010b) Divergence of courtship and mating behaviors among endemic Hawaiian swordtail crickets. Behaviour 147:479–504
Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Emlen DJ (1994) Environmental control of horn length dimorphism in the beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Proc R Soc Lond 256:131–136
Emlen DJ (1997) Diet alters male horn allometry in the beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scaracbaeidae). Proc R Soc Lond 264:567–574
Gabbutt PD (1954) Notes on the mating behavior of Nemobius sylvestris (Bosc) (Orth., Gryllidae). Br J Anim Behav 2:84–88
Gross MR (1996) Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:92–98
Gwynne DT (1997) The evolution of edible ‘sperm sacs’ and the other forms of courtship feeding in crickets, katydids and their kin (Orthoptera: Ensifera). In Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 110–129
Gwynne DT (2001) Katydids and bush-crickets: reproductive behavior and evolution of the Tettigoniidae. Cornell University Press, New York
Gwynne DT (2008) Sexual conflict over nuptial gifts in insects. Ann Rev Entomol 53:83–101
Heino M, Metz JA, Kaitala V (1998) The enigma of frequency-dependent selection. Trends Ecol Evol 13(9):367–370
Kathirithamby J, Johnston JS (2004) The discovery after 94 years of the elusive female of a myrmecolacid (Strepsiptera), and the cryptic species of Caenocholax fenyesi Pierce sensu lato. Proc R Soc Lond 271(3):S5–S8
Krupa JJ (1989) Alternative mating tactics in the great plains toad. Anim Behav 37:1035–1043
Leather SR, Hardie J (1995) Insect reproduction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 255
Martin P, Bateson P (1993) Measuring behavior: an introductory guide, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 222
Mays DL (1971) Mating behavior of Nemobiine crickets: Hygronemobius, Nemobius and Pteronemobius (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Fla Entomol 54:113–126
Morgan H (1928) Studies in the Gryllidae of Panama (Orthoptera). Trans Am Entomol Soc 54:233–294
Oliveira RF, Taborsky M, Brockmann HJ (2008) Alternative reproductive tactics: an integrative approach. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 518
Reynolds JD, Gross MD, Coombs MJ (1993) Enviromental conditions and male morphology determine alternative mating behaviour in Trinidadian guppies. Anim Behav 45:145–152
Rueden CT, Schindelin J, Hiner MC et al (2017) ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinform 18:529. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z (PMID 29187165)
Shaw KL, Khine AH (2004) Courtship behavior in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina: males provide spermless spermatophores as nuptial gifts. Ethology 110:81–95
Shelly TE, Greenfield MD (1985) Alternative mating strategies in a desert grasshopper: a transitional analysis. Anim Behav 33:1211–1222
Shine R, Langkilde T, Wall M, Mason RT (2005) Alternative male mating tactics in the Garter snakes, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis. Anim Behav 70:387–396
Simmons LW, Teale RJ, Maier M, Standish RJ, Bailey WJ, Withers PC (1992) Some costs of reproduction for male bushcrickets, Requena verticalis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae): allocating resources to mate attraction and nuptial feeding. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:57–62
Snedden WA, Skaluk SK (1992) Acoustic signaling and its relation to male mating success in sagebrush crickets. Anim Behav 44:633–639
Southwood TRE (1976) Ecological methods. Chapmann and Hall, London
Tomkins JL, Hazel W (2007) The status of the conditional evolutionarily stable strategy. Trends Ecol Evol 22:522–528
Waltz EC (1982) Alternative mating tactics and the law of diminishing returns: the satellite threshold model. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:75–83
Waltz EC, Wolf LL (1984) By Jove!! Do alternative mating tactics assume so many different forms? Am Zool 24:333–343
Wedell N (1994a) Variation in nuptial gift quality in bush crickets (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Behav Ecol 5:418–425
Wedell N (1994b) Dual function of the bushcricket spermatophore. Proc R Soc Lond 258:181–185
Wedell N (1997) Ejaculate size in bushcrickets: the importance of being large. J Evol Biol 10:315–325
Zuck M, Rotenberry JT, Tinghitella MR (2006) Silent night: adaptative disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets. Biol Lett 2:521–524
Acknowledgements
We thank M. A. Serrano-Meneses for his comments and valuable suggestions on an earlier version of the manuscript. Valuable suggestions on the manuscript also were made by the editor, Judith X. Ponce-Wainer, David N. Fisher and two anonymous reviewers. Anahi Elias-Quevedo acknowledges the Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), and CONACyT for providing her with a scholarship to further her MSc studies (no. 385462).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use for animals were followed.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Elias-Quevedo, A., Cueva del Castillo, R. On the discovery of a male morph with a novelty alternative mating tactic in the neotropical cricket Macroanaxipha macilenta Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J Ethol 38, 3–11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-019-00614-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-019-00614-5