Advertisement

Journal of Ethology

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 271–281 | Cite as

Home range overlap and its genetic correlates in an avian brood parasite, the lesser cuckoo Cuculus poliocephalus

  • Seongho Yun
  • Heeyoung Kim
  • Hye-Kyoung Moon
  • Jin-Won LeeEmail author
  • Jeong-Chil Yoo
Article

Abstract

The absence of parental care is of importance in the evolution of mating and breeding systems. However, its importance in the evolution of these systems in higher vertebrates, such as birds and mammals, has not been well defined since nearly all of them exhibit some form of parental care. Avian brood parasites thus provide a unique opportunity to explore the effect of a lack of parental care in higher vertebrates because they shift care for their progeny onto other species. We investigated the social system of an avian brood parasite, the lesser cuckoo (Cuculus poliocephalus), by using a comprehensive approach that included field observation, radio-tracking, and genetic analyses. We found that genetically unrelated, multiple males and females coexist in a single area; radio-tracking confirmed that this co-occurrence was neither temporary nor arbitrary. Instead, sympatric cuckoos appeared to share their home ranges and often chased each other for mating without antagonistic physical interaction. We conclude that the lesser cuckoo may employ a scramble competition mating system without territoriality, and that this mating system, which is unusual in higher vertebrates, may have arisen due to the absence of parental care. Future studies assessing the parentage of nestlings are needed to establish the genetic basis of this social system.

Keywords

Breeding system Parental care Radio-tracking Scramble competition Mating system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Hee-Jin Noh, Kyung-Hoe Kim, Ha-Na Yoo, Hae-Ni Kim, Sohyeon Yoo, Jung-Woon Jang, Ki-Tae Ahn, and Young-Jun Kim for their assistance in the fieldwork. We are also grateful to Yong-Ho Park and Sung-Hee Shim for their warm hospitality during the fieldwork and Young-Min Moon for valuable help in spatial data analysis. This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (grant number: NRF-2012R1A6A3A04040003), for which we are most grateful.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

The fieldwork was carried out in accordance with the relevant national and international guidelines. The lesser cuckoos were captured with the permission of local government, Seogwipo-si and the Cultural Heritage Administration of Korea. Bird care and fieldwork procedures were approved by Kyung Hee University Animal Ethics Committee.

References

  1. Adcock G, Langmore N, Kilner R (2007) Polymorphic microsatellite loci for studies of bronze-cuckoo species (genus Chalcites: Aves). Mol Ecol Notes 7:678–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alderson G, Gibbs H, Sealy S (1999) Parentage and kinship studies in an obligate brood parasitic bird, the brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater), using microsatellite DNA markers. J Hered 90:182–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anich NM, Benson TJ, Bednarz JC (2009) Effect of radio transmitters on return rates of Swainson's warblers. J Field Ornithol 80:206–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arias-de-Reyna L, Recuerda P, Trujillo J, Corvillo M, Cruz A (1987) Territory in the great spotted cuckoo (Clamator glandarius). J Ornithol 128:231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Börger L, Franconi N, De Michele G, Gantz A, Meschi F, Manica A, Lovari S, Coulson T (2006) Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. J Anim Ecol 75:1393–1405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Burt WH (1943) Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. J Mammal 24:346–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cockburn A (2006) Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds. Proc R Soc B 273:1375–1383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cronin EW, Sherman PW (1976) A resource-based mating system: the orange-rumped honeyguide. Living Bird 15:5–32Google Scholar
  9. Davies NB (2010) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. Black, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. del Hoyo J, Elliot A, Sartagal J, Christie D, De Juana E (2018) Handbook of the birds of the world alive. Lynx, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  11. Dufty AM (1982) Movements and activities of radio-tracked brown-headed cowbirds. Auk 99:316–327Google Scholar
  12. Eck S, Fiebig J, Fiedler W, Heynen I, Nicolai B, Töpfer T, van den Elzen R, Winkler R, Woog F (2012) Measuring Birds-Vögel vermessen. Deutsche Ornithologen-Gesellschaft, WilhelmshavenGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliott PF (1980) Evolution of promiscuity in the brown-headed cowbird. Condor 82:138–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Foerster K, Valcu M, Johnsen A, Kempenaers B (2006) A spatial genetic structure and effects of relatedness on mate choice in a wild bird population. Mol Ecol 15:4555–4567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fossøy F, Antonov A, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Vikan JR, Møller AP, Shykoff JA, Stokke BG (2011) Genetic differentiation among sympatric cuckoo host races: males matter. Proc R Soc B 278:1639–1645CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fossøy F, Sorenson MD, Liang W, Ekrem T, Moksnes A, Møller AP, Rutila J, Røskaft E, Takasu F, Yang C, Stokke BG (2016) Ancient origin and maternal inheritance of blue cuckoo eggs. Nat Commun 7:10272CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. French BW, Cade WH (1989) Sexual selection at varying population densities in male field crickets, Gryllus veletis and G. pennsylvanicus. J Insect Behav 2:105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gibbs HL, Brooke MdL, Davies N (1996) Analysis of genetic differentiation of host races of the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus using mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA variation. Proc R Soc B 263:89–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gibbs HL, De Sousa L, Marchetti K, Nakamura H (1998) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite DNA loci for an obligate brood parasitic bird, the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Mol Ecol 7:1437–1439PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Girden ER (1992) ANOVA: repeated measures. Sage, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Godet L, Marquet M, Eybert M-C, Grégoire E, Monnet S, Fournier J (2015) Bluethroats Luscinia svecica namnetum offset landscape constraints by expanding their home range. J Ornithol 156:591–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grafen A (1984) Natural selection, kin selection and group selection. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, vol 2. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 62-84.Google Scholar
  24. Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJ (1998) A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol 7:1071–1075CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2:618–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hauber ME, Dearborn DC (2003) Parentage without parental care: what to look for in genetic studies of obligate brood-parasitic mating systems. Auk 120:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayward MW, Paul J, Augee ML, Fox BJ, Banks PB (2004) Home range and movements of the quokka Setonix brachyurus (Macropodidae: Marsupialia), and its impact on the viability of the metapopulation on the Australian mainland. J Zool 263:219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hervé M (2017) RVAideMemoire: testing and plotting procedures for biostatistics. R package version 09–68.Google Scholar
  29. Jirotkul M (1999) Population density influences male–male competition in guppies. Anim Behav 58:1169–1175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim H, Lee J-W, Yoo J-C (2017) Characteristics of female calls of four Cuculus species breeding in Korea. Korean J Ornithol 24:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Langmore N, Adcock G, Kilner R (2007) The spatial organization and mating system of Horsfield's bronze-cuckoos, Chalcites basalis. Anim Behav 74:403–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee J-W (2014) Searching for hosts of avian brood parasites breeding in Korea. Korean J Ornithol 21:25–37Google Scholar
  33. Lee J-W, Noh H-J, Lee Y, Kwon Y-S, Kim C-H, Yoo J-C (2014) Spatial patterns, ecological niches, and interspecific competition of avian brood parasites: inferring from a case study of Korea. Ecol Evol 4:3689–3702CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Makowski D (2018) The Psycho package: an efficient and publishing-oriented workflow for psychological science. J Open Source Softw 3:470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nakamura H, Miyazawa Y (1997) Movements, space use and social organization of radio-tracked common cuckoos during the breeeding season in Japan. Jpn J Ornithol 46:23–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Neufeldt I (1966) Life history of the Indian cuckoo, Cuculus micropterus micropterus Gould, in the Soviet Union. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 63:399–419Google Scholar
  37. Nicholls JA, Double MC, Rowell DM, Magrath RD (2000) The evolution of cooperative and pair breeding in thornbills Acanthiza (Pardalotidae). J Avian Biol 31:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Noh H-J, Lee J-W, Yoo J-C (2016) Color morph variation in two brood parasites: common cuckoo and lesser cuckoo. Ornithol Sci 15:109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Odum EP, Kuenzler EJ (1955) Measurement of territory and home range size in birds. Auk 72:128–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Payne RB, Sorensen MD (2005) The cuckoos. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Post W, Wiley JW (1992) The head-down display in shiny cowbirds and its relation to dominance behavior. Condor 94:999–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. URL https://R-project.org./.
  43. Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Riddiford N (1986) Why do cuckoos Cuculus canorus use so many species of hosts? Bird Stud 33:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rothstein SI, Verner J, Steven E (1984) Radio-tracking confirms a unique diurnal pattern of spatial occurrence in the parasitic brown-headed cowbird. Ecology 65:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Royle NJ, Smiseth PT, Kölliker M (2012) The evolution of parental care. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scardamaglia RC, Reboreda JC (2014) Ranging behavior of female and male shiny cowbirds and screaming cowbirds while searching for host nests. Auk 131:610–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schwagmeyer P, Woontner S (1986) Scramble competition polygyny in thirteen-lined ground squirrels: the relative contributions of overt conflict and competitive mate searching. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:359–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Silver R, Andrews H, Ball GF (1985) Parental care in an ecological perspective: a quantitative analysis of avian subfamilies. Am Zool 25:823–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stiver K, Fitzpatrick J, Desjardins J, Neff B, Quinn J, Balshine S (2008) The role of genetic relatedness among social mates in a cooperative breeder. Behav Ecol 19:816–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Strausberger BM, Ashley MV (2003) Breeding biology of brood parasitic brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) characterized by parent-offspring and sibling-group reconstruction. Auk 120:433–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sykes PW, Carpenter JW, Holzman S, Geissler PH (1990) Evaluation of three miniature radio transmitter attachment methods for small passerines. Wildl Soc Bull 18:41–48Google Scholar
  53. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  54. Vogl W, Taborsky B, Taborsky M, Teuschl Y, Honza M (2004) Habitat and space use of European cuckoo females during the egg laying period. Behaviour 141:881–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Waldeck P, Andersson M, Kilpi M, Öst M (2008) Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population. Behav Ecol 19:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Westneat D, Fox CW (2010) Evolutionary behavioral ecology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Woolfenden BE, Gibbs LH, Sealy SG (2002) High opportunity for sexual selection in both sexes of an obligate brood parasitic bird, the brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wyllie I (1981) The cuckoo. Universe, London, BatsfordGoogle Scholar
  59. Yang C, Liang W, Antonov AT, Cai Y, Stokke BG, Fossøy F, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2012) Diversity of parasitic cuckoos and their hosts in China. Chin Birds 3:9–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Korea Institute of OrnithologyKyung Hee UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Korea Institute of OrnithologyKyung Hee UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.National Park Research Institute Bird Research CenterKorea National Park ServiceShinan-gunRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations