Journal of Ethology

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 203–211 | Cite as

Seasonal changes in the sexual segregation patterns of Marco Polo sheep in Taxkorgan Nature Reserve

  • Muyang Wang
  • David Blank
  • Yutao Wang
  • Wenxuan Xu
  • Weikang YangEmail author
  • Joana Alves


Sexual segregation is observed widely among ruminants, but remains poorly understood in argali. Since sexual segregation is affected by habitat, and in different environments may differ among species and subspecies, we studied this behavioral pattern in Marco Polo sheep (Ovis ammon polii) in their natural habitat at high elevations of the Pamir Plateau using three distinct measurements. We found that, similar to other wild sheep, female and male Marco Polo sheep were highly segregated most of the year and gathered into mixed-sex groups mostly during the rut, which occurred later and for a shorter time than in other argali subspecies experiencing milder climates. This phenomenon was related to the severe environmental conditions of the Pamir Plateau that provided a very short period of favorable weather for birthing and rearing young; correspondingly, aggregation into mixed-sex groups during the rut also occurred later and for a shorter period of time than in other argali populations at lower elevations. Moreover, the degree of segregation between females and males increased with the males’ age. Subadult males switched between male and female groups, staying more with males during lambing and with females during the rut. The timing and duration of sexual segregation and aggregation of Marco Polo sheep were a result of adaption to their local environment.


Ovis ammon polii Segregation coefficient Body size dimorphism Climate 



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31661143019, 41661144001). J. A. was supported by POPH/FSE funds from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology through post-doctoral fellowship SFRH/BPD/123087/2016. We are grateful to Patricia Johnston for her help with the English revision and to Wang Peng, Zhou Li, Yang JW, Zhu Lin, Milu Gawaerxia and staff of the TNR for providing logistical support during the fieldwork.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. This article does not refer to any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.


  1. Alves J, Alves da Silva A, Soares AMVM, Fonseca C (2013) Sexual segregation in red deer: is social behaviour more important than habitat preferences? Anim Behav 85:501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berber A (1999) Mountain sheep (Ovis ammon collium) in central Kazakhstan: biological basis for conservation, environmental management. Ph.D. thesis. Karaganda University, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  3. Blank DA, Ruckstuhl KE, Yang W (2012) Sexual segregation in goitered gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa). Can J Zool 90:955–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bleich VC, Bowyer RT, Wehausen JD (1997) Sexual segregation in mountain sheep: resources or predation? Wildl Monogr 134:3–50Google Scholar
  5. Bon R, Campan R (1996) Unexplained sexual segregation in polygamous ungulates: a defense of an ontogenetic approach. Behav Process 38(13):1–154Google Scholar
  6. Bon R, Rideau C, Villaret JC, Joachim J (2001) Segregation is not only a matter of sex in Alpine ibex, Capra ibex ibex. Anim Behav 62:495–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonenfant C, Gaillard JM, Dray S, Loison A, Royer M, Chessel D (2007) Testing sexual segregation and aggregation: old ways are best. Ecology 88:3202–3208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourgoin G, Marchand P, Hewison AJM, Ruckstuhl KE, Garel M (2018) Social behaviour as a predominant driver of sexual, age-dependent and reproductive segregation in Mediterranean mouflon. Anim Behav 136:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calhim S, Shi JB, Dunbar RIM (2006) Sexual segregation among feral goats: testing between alternative hypotheses. Anim Behav 72(1):31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clutton-Brock TH, Guiness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: behaviour and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Conradt L (1998) Could asynchrony in activity between the sexes cause intersexual social segregation in ruminants? Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1359–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corti P, Shackleton DM (2002) Relationship between predation-risk factors and sexual segregation in Dall's sheep (Ovis dalli dalli). Can J Zool 80:2108–2117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fedosenko AK, Blank DA (2001) Capra sibirica. Mamm Species 675:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fedosenko AK, Blank DA (2005) Ovis ammon. Mamm Species 773:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fedosenko AK (2000) Argali in Russia and the contiguous countries: status, ecology, behavior, conservation, and economic use of the populations. Department for the Conservation and Development of the Hunting Resources of the Russian Ministry of Agriculture, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  16. Geist V (1968) On the interrelation of external appearance, social behaviour and social structure of mountain sheep. Ethology 25:199–215Google Scholar
  17. Haider J, Khan MZ, Anwer M, Ali S, Ali H (2018) Population status and migration trends of Marco Polo argali (Ovis ammon polii) in Pakistan. MammaliaGoogle Scholar
  18. Hillman JC (1987) Group size and association patterns of the common eland (Tragelaphus oryx). J Zool 213:641–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kie JG, Bowyer RT (1999) Sexual segregation in white-tailed deer: density dependent changes in use of space, habitat selection, and dietary niche. J Mammal 80:1004–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li B, Wang M, Blank D, Xu W, Yang W, Ruckstuhl KE (2017) Sexual segregation in the Darwini wild sheep, Ovis ammon darwini (Bovidae, Artiodactyla), in the Mengluoke Mountains of Xinjiang, China. Folia Zool 66:126–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loe LE, Irvine RJ, Bonenfant C, Stien A, Langvatn R, Albon SD, Mysterud A, Stenseth NC (2006) Testing five hypotheses of sexual segregation in an arctic ungulate. J Anim Ecol 75:485–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Main MB (2008) Reconciling competing ecological explanations for sexual segregation in ungulates. Ecology 89:693–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Main MB, Coblentz BE (1996) Sexual segregation in rocky mountain mule deer. J Wildl Manage 60:497–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meldrum GE, Ruckstuhl KE (2009) Mixed-sex group formation by bighorn sheep in winter: trading costs of synchrony for benefits of group living. Anim Behav 77:919–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Owen-Smith N (1993) Comparative mortality rates of male and female kudus: the costs of sexual size dimorphism. J Anim Ecol 62:428–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ruckstuh KE, Neuhaus P (2007) Sexual segregation in vertebrates: proximate and ultimate causes. Integr Comp Biol 47:245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ruckstuhl KE (1998) Foraging behaviour and sexual segregation in bighorn sheep. Anim Behav 56:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruckstuhl KE (1999) To synchronise or not to synchronise, a dilemma for young bighorn males. Behaviour 136:805–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ruckstuhl KE, Neuhaus P (2000) Sexual segregation in ungulates: a new approach. Behaviour 137:361–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ruckstuhl KE, Neuhaus P (2002) Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses. Biol Rev 77:77–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ruckstuhl KE, Neuhaus P (2005) Sexual segregation in vertebrates: ecology of the two sexes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 245–257Google Scholar
  32. Schaller GB, Li H, Lu H, Ren JR, Qiu MJ, Wang HB (1987) Status of large mammals in the Taxkorgan Reserve, Xinjiang. China. Biol Conserv 42(1):53–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schaller GB, Kang A (2008) Status of Marco Polo sheep Ovis ammon polii in China and adjacent countries: conservation of a Vulnerable subspecies. Oryx 42(01):100–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schaller GB (1998) Wildlife of the Tibetan Steppe. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  35. Shi J, Dunbar RIM, Buckland D, Miller D (2005) Dynamics of grouping patterns and social segregation in feral goats (Capra hircus) on the Isle of Rum, NW Scotland. Mammalia 69:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Singh NJ, Bonenfant C, Yoccoz NG, Côté SD (2010) Sexual segregation in Eurasian wild sheep. Behav Ecol 21:410–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Toïgo C, Gaillard JM, Michallet J (1996) La taille des groupes: un bioindicateur de l'effectif des populations de bouquetin des Alpes (Capra ibex ibex)?Google Scholar
  38. Tsapluk OE, Savinov EF (1973) Sexual rhythms of the Siberian ibex in the Dzhungarian Alatau Mountains. Proc Inst Zool 34. Academy of Sciences of KazSSR, Alma-Ata, pp 200–212Google Scholar
  39. Valdez R, Michel S, Subbotin A, Klich D (2016) Status and population structure of a hunted population of Marco Polo argali Ovis ammon polii (Cetartiodactyla, Bovidae) in Southeastern Tajikistan. Mammalia 80:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Villerette N, Marchal C, Pays O, Delorme D, Gerard JF (2006) Do the sexes tend to segregate in roe deer in agricultural environments? An analysis of group composition. Can J Zool 84:787–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CAS Key Laboratory of Biogeography and Bioresources in Arid LandXinjiang Institute of Ecology and GeographyÜrümqiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Research Center for Ecology and Environment of Central AsiaBishkekKyrgyzstan
  3. 3.College of Life and Geographic SciencesKashi UniversityKashiPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Department of Life Sciences, CFE-Centre for Functional EcologyUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations