Non-vocal communication as an anti-predator strategy in scaled doves (Columbina squammata)
Different strategies have evolved in response to predation pressure. Many species use acoustic signals to communicate about the presence of predators, and some of them use non-vocal sounds. Here, we evaluated the role of the non-vocal sound produced by scaled doves (Columbina squammata) during escape takeoffs. Initially, we investigated the context of the non-vocal sound production to access the effects of natural threats on individuals’ escape response. Then, we used simulated attacks (a direct running movement toward the focal individuals) to confirm the preliminary observations and to evaluate how position in the group affects escape response and vigilance. For both the observational and experimental parts, we registered, among other variables, the occurrence of takeoff flight, if it was followed by a production of non-vocal sound, the position of the individuals within the flock and their response (e.g., stay, flew, vigilance). We observed that both solitary and flocked individuals produce non-vocal sounds during takeoff flights, although it was more commonly registered for flocks. The production of the non-vocal sound elicited a faster escape response on flock members, and individuals at the center of the flock showed a higher probability to takeoff. The results suggest that the non-vocal sound may signal information about predation risk and that it may be directed both to conspecifics and to the predator itself. Our results therefore contribute to the understanding of the evolution of mechanical sound production in birds and shed some light on its function as a communication signal, especially under a predation context.
KeywordsAcoustic communication Alarm signal Mechanical sound Non-vocal sound Predator–prey communication Trill
We would like to thank the Centro Universitário de Brasília (UniCEUB) and the Institutional Scientific Initiation Scholarship Program (PIC) for the financial support.
This study was funded by the Institutional Scientific Initiation Scholarship Program (PIC) of the Centro Universitário de Brasília.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
P S. Amorim and R. I. Dias declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted. The study complied with the current laws of Brazil under permit 50793 from Instituto Brasileiro de Recursos Renováveis (IBAMA).
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- Alexander RD (1974) The evolution of social behavior. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:325–383. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bioacoustics Research Program (2014) Raven pro: interactive sound analysis software (Version 1.5) [Computer software]. The Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY. http://www.birds.cornell.edu/raven
- Clark CJ (2016) Locomotion-induced sounds and sonations: mechanisms, communication function, and relationship with behavior. In: Suthers R, Fitch T (eds) Vertebrate sound production and acoustic communication. Springer handbook of auditory research, vol 53, pp 83–117Google Scholar
- Cristaldo PF, Jandak V, Kutalová K, Rodrigues VB, Brothánek M, Jiřı́ček O, DeSouza O, Šabotnı́k J (2015) The nature of alarm communication in Constrictotermes cyphergaster (Blattodea: Termitoidea: Termitidae): the integration of chemical and vibroacoustic signals. Biol Open 4:1649–1659. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.014084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Curio E (1978) The adaptive significance of avian mobbing. I. Teleonomic hypotheses and predictions. Z Tierpsychol 48:175–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1978.tb00254.x Google Scholar
- Helfman GS, Winkelman DL (2010) Threat sensitivity in bicolor damselfish: effects of sociality and body size. Ethology 103:369–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1997.tb00153.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hill RA, Lee PC (1998) Predation risk as an influence on group size in cercopithecoid primates: implications for social structure. J Zool 245:447–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00119.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krause J, Ruxton G (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Langkilde T, Schwarzkoff L, Alford RA (2005) The function of tail displays in male Rainbow Skinks (Carlia jarnoldae). J Herpetol 39:325–328. https://doi.org/10.1670/0022-1511(2005)39%5b0325:TFOTDI%5d2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.Rproject.org/
- Rubenstein DI (1978) On predation, competition, and the advantages of group living. In: Bateson PPG, Klopfer PH (eds) Social behavior. Perspectives in ethology, vol 3. Springer, Boston, pp 205–231Google Scholar
- Sick H (1997) Ornitologia Brasileira. Nova Fronteira, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
- Smith MJ, Harper D (2003) Animal signals. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Van Staaden MJ, Römer H (1997) Sexual signalling in bladder grasshoppers: tactical design for maximizing calling range. J Exp Biol 200:2597–2608Google Scholar