Response variable
|
Explanatory variablea (effect)
|
df
|
Reduction in deviance (scaled)
|
p
b
|
---|
Courtship
|
Age
|
1
|
80.696
|
<2.2 × 10−16
|
Condition
|
2
|
58.484
|
1.997 × 10−13
|
Age × condition
|
2
|
36.199
|
1.379 × 10−08
|
Copulation
|
Age
|
1
|
73.286
|
<2.2 × 10−16
|
Condition
|
2
|
43.496
|
3.588 × 10−10
|
Age × condition
|
2
|
22.144
|
1.554 × 10−05
|
Leg vibration
|
Age
|
1
|
99.231
|
<2.2 × 10−16
|
Condition
|
2
|
10.637
|
0.004901
|
Age × condition
|
2
|
0.75616
|
0.6852
|
Courtship duration
|
Age
|
1
|
15.458
|
8.431 × 10−05
|
Condition
|
2
|
7.7898
|
0.02034
|
Leg vibration
|
1
|
59.339
|
1.327 × 10−14
|
Copulation duration
|
Age
|
1
|
7.6750
|
0.005599
|
Condition
|
2
|
13.842
|
0.0009869
|
Age × condition
|
2
|
3.6340
|
0.1625
|
-
aFull models included age and condition as explanatory variables, except for courtship duration that included an additional variable, leg vibration. Effect of interaction term was examined by adding it to the models involving age and condition
-
bSignificance of reduction in deviance, examined using likelihood ratio tests