Journal of Ethology

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 75–82 | Cite as

Grandmotherly care: a case study in Indian free-ranging dogs

  • Manabi Paul
  • Sreejani Sen Majumder
  • Anindita Bhadra
Article

Abstract

Parental care is an essential component in the life history of mammals. In group-living species, care can be provided by adults other than the parents, and such care is termed alloparental care. Alloparental care is known in a wide spectrum of species, from insects to humans. Most canids that live in stable packs demonstrate cooperative breeding, where subordinates provide care to the offspring of the dominants, without reproducing themselves. Free-ranging dogs in India have a dynamic social system and, unlike their cooperatively breeding ancestors, the grey wolves, all adults in a dog group have equal mating opportunities. This at times leads to the birth of multiple litters within an existing dog group. In this paper, we report the first field observations of alloparental care made on a dog group where a bitch provided care to her grandpups, through interactions other than suckling. The allomaternal care acted as a supplement to the care provided by the mother, and was thus beneficial to the pups.

Keywords

Alloparental care Social Dogs Pups Cooperative breeding 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was purely observation based, and was carried out on the IISER-K campus, without harming the dogs in any manner, or handling them, and did not violate the animal rights and ethics laws of India. M.P. and S.S.M. carried out the observations. A.B. planned and supervised the work. M.P. co-wrote the paper with A.B. The authors thank the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, India for funding and the Indian Institute of Science Education and Research—Kolkata, India for providing infrastructural support. We thank the members of the MTS unit, IISER-Kolkata for allowing free access of their terrace to ML and her family. We thank Prof. Raghavendra Gadagkar of the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore and Jan Koler-Matznick, CPDT, USA for their inputs that helped to improve this manuscript.

Supplementary material

10164_2014_396_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)
10164_2014_396_MOESM2_ESM.tif (55.4 mb)
ESM Figure 1: The LEL and MTS buildings with the denning sites of ML and PW marked with arrows on the two terraces. (TIFF 56691 kb)
10164_2014_396_MOESM3_ESM.tif (1.4 mb)
ESM Figure 2: Detailed map of the area under observation, showing the home range of the focal group (marked with yellow) and all the resources and landmarks within the area. Geographical coordinates were measured using a Garmin eTrex 30 GPS device. The positional data was compiled using ‘Garmin Basecamp’ and the territory was delineated on Google Earth. (TIFF 1389 kb)
10164_2014_396_MOESM4_ESM.tif (64.5 mb)
ESM Figure 3: The mating details of ML and PW in the two seasons. (TIFF 66005 kb)

References

  1. Achappa A (2012) Stray dog chasing black buck. Conservation India Gallery July 27. http://www.conservationindia.org/gallery/stray-dog-chasing-blackbucks
  2. Allen D (1979) Wolves of Minong: Isle Royale’s wild community. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen W (1986) Pseudopregnancy in the bitch: the current view on aetiology and treatment. J Small Anim Pract 27:419–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bastan A, Findik M, Aslan S (1998) The use of cabergoline for treatment of pseudopregnancy in dogs with the purpose of suppressing lactation. Reprod Dom Anim 33:49–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck A (1975) The ecology of “feral” and free-roving dogs in Baltimore. In: Fox MW (ed) The wild canids: their systematics, behavioral ecology and evolution. Van Nostrand Reinhold, Florence, pp 380–390Google Scholar
  6. Bekoff M (1975) Social behavior and ecology of the African Canidae: a review. In: Fox MW (ed) The wild canids: their systematics, behavioral ecology and evolution. Van Nostrand Reinhold, Florence, pp 120–142Google Scholar
  7. Bekoff M (1977) Canis latrans. Mamm Species 79:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bekoff M, Wells M (1980) The social ecology of coyotes. Sci Am 242:130–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berman M, Dunbar I (1983) The social behaviour of free-ranging suburban dogs. Appl Anim Ethol 10:5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clutton-Brock T (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  11. Clutton-Brock J (1995) Origins of the dog: domestication and early history. In: Serpell J (ed) The domestic dog, its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 7–20Google Scholar
  12. Clutton-Brock TH (2006) Cooperative breeding in mammals. In: Kappeler PM, Schaik CP (eds) Cooperation in primates and humans. Springer, Berlin, pp 173–190. doi:10.1007/3-540-28277-7_10
  13. Cornwallis CK, West SA, Davis KE, Griffin AS (2010) Promiscuity and the evolutionary transition to complex societies. Nature 466:969–972. doi:10.1038/nature09335 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Creel S, Macdonald D (1995) Sociality, group size, and reproductive suppression among carnivores. Adv Study Behav 24:203–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daniels T (1983) The social organization of free-ranging urban dogs. I. Non-estrous social behavior. Appl Anim Ethol 10:341–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dewey K (1997) Energy and protein requirements during lactation. Annu Rev Nutr 17:19–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dewey K (1998) Effects of maternal caloric restriction and exercise during lactation. J Nutr 128:386S–389SPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Emlen ST (1982) The evolution of helping. I. An ecological constraints model. Am Nat 119:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Estes R, Goddard J (1967) Prey selection and hunting behavior of the African wild dog. J Wildl Manag 31(1):52–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ewer R (1973) The carnivores. Cornell University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. Font E (1987) Spacing and social organization: urban stray dogs revisited. Appl Anim Behav Sci 17:319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fox M (1975) Evolution of social behavior in canids. In: Fox MW (ed) The wild canids: their systematics, behavioral ecology and evolution. Van Nostrand Reinhold, Florence, pp 429–460Google Scholar
  23. Fox M, Beck A, Blackman E (1975) Behavior and ecology of a small group of urban dogs (Canis familiaris). Appl Anim Ethol 1:119–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gier H (1975) Ecology and behavior of the coyote (Canis latrans). In: Fox MW (ed) The wild canids: their systematics, behavioral ecology and evolution. Van Nostrand Reinhold, Florence, pp 247–262Google Scholar
  25. Gobello C, Baschar H, Castex G, de la Sota RL, Goya RG (2001a) Dioestrous ovariectomy: a model to study the role of progesterone in the onset of canine pseudopregnancy. J Reprod Fertil 57:55–60Google Scholar
  26. Gobello C, Concannon PW, Iii JV (2001b) Canine pseudopregnancy: a review. In: Concannon PW, England G, Verstegen III J, Linde-Forsberg C (eds) Recent advances in small animal reproduction. International Veterinary Information Service, Ithaca, NY, A1215.0801Google Scholar
  27. Gubernick DJ (1981) Parent and infant attachment in mammals. In: Gubernick DJ, Klopfer PH (eds) Parental care in mammals. Springer, New York, pp 243–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamilton W (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol 7:17–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jennions M, Macdonald D (1994) Cooperative breeding in mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 9:89–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson C, Angeles L (1980) Alloparental care and kinship in captive social groups of vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus). Primates 21:406–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones CB (1981) Comment on “Allomothering Langurs” in Hanuman. Ethol Sociobiol 2:89–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaushik A (2008) Dogs hunt black bucks at Velavadar sanctuary. The Times of India, September 17Google Scholar
  33. Kleiman D (1968) Reproduction in the Canidae. Int Zoo Yearb 8:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kleiman DG (2011) Canid mating systems, social behavior, parental care and ontogeny: are they flexible? Behav Genet 41:803–809. doi:10.1007/s10519-011-9459-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kleiman D, Brady C (1978) Coyote behavior in the context of recent canid research. In: Bekoff M (ed) Coyotes: biology, behaviour and management. Academic, New York, pp 163–188Google Scholar
  36. Kleiman D, Malcolm J (1981) The evolution of male parental investment in mammals. In: Gubernick DJ, Klopfer PH (eds) Parental care in mammals. Springer, New York, pp 347–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kruuk H (1975) Functional aspects of social hunting by carnivores. In: Baerends G, Beer C, Manning A (eds) Functions and evolution in behaviour: essays in honour of Professor Niko Tinbergen. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Kühme W (1965) Communal food distribution and division of labour in African hunting dogs. Nature 205:443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lukas D, Clutton-Brock T (2012) Cooperative breeding and monogamy in mammalian societies. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:2151–2156. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.2468 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Macdonald D (1979) The flexible social system of the golden jackal, Canis aureus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Macdonald D (1983) The ecology of carnivore social behaviour. Nature 301:379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Md-Zain BMCEC, Ch’ng CE (2011) The activity patterns of a group of Cantor’s dusky leaf monkeys (Trachypithecus obscurus halonifer). Int J Zool Res 7:59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mech LD (1970) The wolf: ecology and behavior of an endangered species. Natural History Press, Garden CityGoogle Scholar
  44. Moehlman PD (1979) Jackal helpers and pup survival. Nature 277:382–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moehlman P, Hofer H (1997) Cooperative breeding, reproductive suppression, and body mass in canids. In: Moehlman PD, Hofer H, Solomon NG (eds) Cooperative breeding in mammals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 76–128Google Scholar
  46. Montgomerie R (1981) Why do jackals help their parents? Nature 289:824–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morris C (2011) Exploring the necessity of others in human evolution. J Soc Evol Cult Psychol 5(4):293–295Google Scholar
  48. Murie A (1985) The wolves of Mount McKinley. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  49. Oppili P (2013) Birds fall prey to dogs at Pallikaranai. The Hindu, October 29Google Scholar
  50. Pal SK (2005) Parental care in free-ranging dogs, Canis familiaris. Appl Anim Behav Sci 90:31–47. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pal S (2008) Maturation and development of social behaviour during early ontogeny in free-ranging dog puppies in West Bengal, India. Appl Anim Behav Sci 111:95–107. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.05.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pal SK (2011) Mating system of free-ranging dogs (Canis familiaris). Int J Zool 2011:1–10. doi:10.1155/2011/314216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pal S, Ghosh B, Roy S (1998) Dispersal behaviour of free-ranging dogs (Canis familiaris) in relation to age, sex, season and dispersal distance. Appl Anim Behav Sci 61:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peterson R, Ciucci P (2003) The wolf as a carnivore. In: Mech LD, Boitani L (eds) Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 104–130Google Scholar
  55. Quinlan RJ, Quinlan MB (2008) Human lactation, pair-bonds, and alloparents. Hum Nat 19:87–102. doi:10.1007/s12110-007-9026-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Redondo T, Tortosa FS, Reyna LA (1995) Nest switching and alloparental care in colonial white storks. Anim Behav 49:1097–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rheingold H (1963) Maternal behavior in mammals. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Riedman ML (1982) The evolution of alloparental care and adoption in mammals and birds. Q Rev Biol 57:405–435Google Scholar
  59. Rogowitz G (1996) Trade-offs in energy allocation during lactation. Am Zool 36:197–204Google Scholar
  60. Rohwer S, Herron J, Daly M (1999) Stepparental behavior as mating effort in birds and other animals. Evol Hum Behav 20:367–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sandell M (1989) The mating tactics and spacing patterns of solitary carnivores. In: Gittleman JL (ed) Carnivore behaviour, ecology and evolution, vol I. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 164–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scott J, Fuller J (1965) Genetics and the social behavior of the dog. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  63. Scott J, Marston M (1950) Critical periods affecting the development of normal and mal-adjustive social behavior of puppies. Pedagog Semin J Genet Psychol 77:25–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sen Majumder S, Bhadra A, Ghosh A et al. (2013/2014) To be or not to be social: foraging associations of free-ranging dogs in an urban ecosystem. Acta Ethol 17(1):1–8. doi:10.1007/s10211-013-0158-0 Google Scholar
  65. Serpell J (1995) The domestic dog: its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  66. Sillero-Zubiri C, Hoffmann M, Macdonald DW (2004) Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals, and dogs: status survey and conservation action plan. Information Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  67. Small MF (1990) Alloparental behaviour in Barbary macaques, Macaca sylvanus. Anim Behav 39:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Solomon N, French J (1997) Cooperative breeding in mammals. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  69. van Lawick H, van Lawick-Goodall J (1971) Innocent killers. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  70. Vanak A, Gompper M (2009) Dietary niche separation between sympatric free-ranging domestic dogs and Indian foxes in central India. J Mamm 90:1058–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vanak AT, Thaker M, Gompper ME (2009) Experimental examination of behavioural interactions between free-ranging wild and domestic canids. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:279–287. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0845-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weber AF (1944) Pseudopregnancy in dogs. Iowa State University Vet 7(1):32–38Google Scholar
  73. Welker W (1959) Genesis of exploratory and play behavior in infant raccoons. Psychol Rep 5(3):764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wilson EO (1975) Leptothorax duloticus and the beginnings of slavery in ants. Evolution 29(1):108–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wisenden B (1999) Alloparental care in fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fish 9:45–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Woodroffe R, Vincent A (1994) Mother’s little helpers: patterns of male care in mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 9:294–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manabi Paul
    • 1
  • Sreejani Sen Majumder
    • 1
  • Anindita Bhadra
    • 1
  1. 1.Behaviour and Ecology Lab, Department of Biological SciencesIndian Institute of Science Education and ResearchKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations