Journal of Ethology

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 41–47 | Cite as

Seasonal and sex differences in urine marking rates of wild red foxes Vulpes vulpes

  • John K. Fawcett
  • Jeanne M. Fawcett
  • Carl D. Soulsbury
Article

Abstract

Understanding the role of urine marking in the territorial systems of wild mammals can be difficult, especially for nocturnal cryptic species. Even for common species, such as the red fox Vulpes vulpes, a comprehensive analysis of seasonal and sex differences has not been carried out. Using 6 years of infra-red video monitoring, we compared marking rates between months and between sexes. Urine marking was significantly lower during summer (June–August). Males urine marked significantly more frequently than females during late summer and autumn, but not winter. Males marked more frequently than females also during March. There was no increase during the breeding season for either sex. Our results correlate with previous partial data but demonstrate how urine marking rates vary across the year. They also further support the greater role of males in fox territorial maintenance. Urine marking is lowest during summer when territorial intrusions are least, whilst the higher male urine marking rate in March reflects the period when females are denning. Overall, our results provide the first comprehensive analysis of red fox urine marking rates, contributing to a greater understanding of territoriality and olfactory communication.

Keywords

Scent marking Territoriality Dispersal Home range Semiochemistry Red fox 

References

  1. Arnold J, Soulsbury CD, Harris S (2011) Spatial and behavioral changes by red foxes (Vulpes vulpes L., 1758) in response to artificial territory intrusion. Can J Zool 89:808–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asa CS, Mech LD, Seal US, Plotka ED (1990) The influence of social and endocrine factors on urine-marking by captive wolves (Canis lupus). Horm Behav 24:497–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker PJ, Harris S (2004) Red foxes: the behavioural ecology of red foxes in urban Bristol, pp 207–216. In: Macdonald DW, Sillero-Zubiri C (eds) The biology and conservation of wild canids. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker PJ, Funk SM, Harris S, White PCL (2000) Flexible spatial organization of urban foxes, Vulpes vulpes, before and during an outbreak of sarcoptic mange. Anim Behav 59:127–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker PJ, Harris S, Robertson CPJ, Saunders G, White PCL (2001) Differences in the capture rate of cage-trapped red foxes Vulpes vulpes and an evaluation of rabies control measures in Britain. J Appl Ecol 38:823–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barja I, de Miguel FJ, Bárcena F (2005) Faecal marking behaviour of Iberian wolf in different zones of their territory. Folia Zool 54:21–29Google Scholar
  7. Bates D, Maechler M (2009) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes, R package version 0.999375-31. (http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/)
  8. Begg CM, Begg KS, Du Toit JT, Mills MBL (2003) Scent-marking behaviour of the honey badger, Mellivora capensis (Mustelidae), in the southern Kalahari. Anim Behav 66:917–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blizard RA, Perry GC (1979) Response of captive male red foxes (Vulpes vulpes L.) to some conspecific odors. J Chem Ecol 5:869–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavallini P (1996) Variation in the social system of the red fox. Ethol Ecol Evol 8:323–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doncaster CP, Macdonald DW (1997) Activity patterns and interactions of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Oxford city. J Zool 241:73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eisenberg JF, Kleiman DG (1972) Olfactory communication in mammals. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 3:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gese EM, Ruff EL (1997) Scent-marking by coyotes, Canis latrans: the influence of social and ecological factors. Anim Behav 54:1155–1166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goszczyński J (1990) Scent marking by red foxes in central Poland during the winter season. Acta Theriol 35:7–16Google Scholar
  15. Goszczyński J (2002) Home ranges in red fox: territoriality diminishes with increasing area. Acta Theriol 47(Suppl. 1):103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamel S, Yoccoz NG, Gaillard J-M (2012) Statistical evaluation of parameters estimating autocorrelation and individual heterogeneity in longitudinal studies. Methods Ecol Evol 3:731–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris S, Trewhella WJ (1988) An analysis of some of the factors affecting dispersal in an urban fox (Vulpes vulpes) population. J Appl Ecol 25:409–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henry JD (1977) The use of urine marking in the scavenging behavior of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Behaviour 61:82–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henry JD (1980) The urine marking behavior and movement patterns of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) during a breeding and post-breeding period. In: Müller-Schwarze D, Silverstein RM (eds) Chemical signals: vertebrates and aquatic invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York, pp 11–27Google Scholar
  20. Henry C, Poulle M-L, Roeder J-J (2005) Effect of sex and female reproductive status on seasonal home range size and stability in rural red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Ecoscience 12:203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hutchings MR, Service KM, Harris S (2001) Defecation and urination patterns of badgers Meles meles at low density in south west England. Acta Theriol 46:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Iossa G (2005) The reproductive behaviour of an urban red fox (Vulpes vulpes) population. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Iossa G, Soulsbury CD, Baker PJ, Harris S (2008) Body mass, territory size, and life-history tactics in a socially monogamous canid, the red fox Vulpes vulpes. J Mammal 89:1481–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Iossa G, Soulsbury CD, Baker PJ, Edwards KJ, Harris S (2009) Behavioral changes associated with a population density decline in the facultatively social red fox. Behav Ecol 20:385–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johansson BG, Jones TM (2007) The role of chemical communication in mate choice. Biol Rev 82:265–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jordan NR (2007) Scent-marking investment is determined by sex and breeding status in meerkats. Anim Behav 74:531–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Korhonen H, Alasuutari S (1995) Dominance relations in captive groups of adult and juvenile arctic blue foxes Alopex lagopus. Polar Biol 15:353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kullberg C, Angerbjörn A (1992) Social behavior and cooperative breeding in arctic foxes in a semi-natural environment. Ethology 90:321–335Google Scholar
  29. Lloyd HG (1980) The red fox. Batsford, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Macdonald DW (1979a) Some observations and field experiments on the urine marking behaviour of the red fox, Vulpes vulpes L. Z Tierpsychl 51:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Macdonald DW (1979b) ‘Helpers’ in fox society. Nature 282:69–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Macdonald DW, Buesching CD, Stopka P, Henderson J, Ellwood SA, Baker SE (2004) Encounters between two sympatric carnivores: red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and European badgers (Meles meles). J Zool 263:385–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2010) Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 85:935–956PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Newton-Fisher N, Harris S, White P, Jones G (1993) Structure and function of red fox Vulpes vulpes vocalizations. Bioacoustics 5:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pal SK (2003) Urine marking by free-ranging dogs (Canis familiaris) in relation to sex, season, place and posture. Appl Anim Behav Sci 80:45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. R Development Core Team (2011) R A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. (http://www.r-project.org/)
  37. Ralls K (1971) Mammalian scent marking. Science 171:443–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Robertson CPJ, Baker PJ, Harris S (2000) Ranging behaviour of juvenile red foxes and its implications for management. Acta Theriol 45:525–535Google Scholar
  39. Roper TJ, Shepherdson DJ, Davies JM (1986) Scent marking with faeces and anal secretion in the European badger (Meles meles): seasonal and spatial characteristics of latrine use in relation to territoriality. Behaviour 97:94–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sillero-Zubiri C, Macdonald DW (1998) Scent-marking and territorial behaviour of Ethiopian wolves Canis simensis. J Zool 245:351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith JLD, McDougal C, Miquelle D (1989) Scent marking in free ranging tigers, Panthera tigris. Anim Behav 37:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Soulsbury CD, Iossa G, Baker PJ, Harris S (2008) Environmental variation at the onset of independent foraging affects full-grown body mass in the red fox. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 275:2411–2418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Soulsbury CD, Iossa G, Baker PJ, White PCL, Harris S (2011) Behavioral and spatial analysis of extraterritorial movements in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). J Mammal 92:190–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vergara V (2001) Two cases of infanticide in a red fox,Vulpes vulpes, family in southern Ontario. Can Field Nat 115:170–172Google Scholar
  45. White PCL, Harris S (1994) Encounters between red foxes (Vulpes vulpes): implications for territory maintenance, social cohesion and dispersal. J Anim Ecol 63:315–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. White PCL, Saunders G, Harris S (1996) Spatio-temporal patterns of home range use by foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in urban environments. J Anim Ecol 65:121–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Whitten WK, Wilson MC, Wilson SR, Jorgenson JW, Novotny M, Carmack M (1980) Induction of marking behavior in wild red foxes (Vulpes vulpes L.) by synthetic urinary constituents. J Chem Ecol 6:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wyatt TD (2003) Pheromones and animal behaviour: communication by smell and taste. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer Japan 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • John K. Fawcett
    • 1
  • Jeanne M. Fawcett
    • 1
  • Carl D. Soulsbury
    • 2
  1. 1.BrockenhurstUK
  2. 2.School of Life Sciences, Riseholme CampusUniversity of LincolnLincolnUK

Personalised recommendations