Skip to main content
Log in

Foraging efficiency of Akodon azarae under different plant cover and resource levels

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ethology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this work was to determine how the foraging behaviour of Akodon azarae changes with predation risk and food availability in cropfield borders of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Our hypotheses were that A. azarae has a greater foraging efficiency in safe areas than in risky ones and that the foraging behaviour of A. azarae also depends on the level of resources. We measured giving-up densities (GUDs) and food consumption twice a year in artificial foraging patches (bottles with known amounts of millet seed) in covered and open areas and with two different levels of seed abundance. In both periods, GUDs were lower in the covered areas than in the open ones independently of food level. Consumption increased with food level in covered areas but not in open areas. Based on these results, we conclude that A. azarae appears to maximize its consumption depending on predation risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bellocq MI (1987) Selección de hábitat de caza y depredación diferencial de Athene cunicularia sobre roedores en ecosistemas agrarios. Rev Chil Hist Nat 60:81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellocq MI (1988) Predación de roedores por aves en ecosistemas agrarios. PhD thesis. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires

  • Bilenca DN, Kravetz FO (1995) Patrones de abundancia relativa en ensambles de pequeños roedores de la región pampeana. Ecol Aust 5:21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilenca DN, Kravetz FO (1998) Seasonal variations in microhabitat use and feeding habits of the pampas mouse Akodon azarae in agroecosystems of central Argentina. Acta Theriol 43:193–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaventura SM, Cagnoni M (1995) La vegetación de los bordes de caminos en agroecosistemas. Physics (Bs As) Sec C 50:63–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaventura SM, Bellocq MI, Kravetz FO (1988) Selección de hábitat por roedores en campos de cultivos. Un estudio experimental. Physics (Bs As) Sec C 46:61–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS (1988) Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Kotler BP, Smith RJ, Wirtz WO (1988) The effects of owl predation on the foraging behavior of heteromyid rodents. Oecologia 76:408–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch M, Kravetz FO (1992) Competitive interactions among rodents (Akodon azarae, Calomys laucha, C. musculinus and Oligoryzomys flavescens) in a two-habitat system. I. Spatial and numerical relationships. Mammalia 56:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch M, Alvarez MR, Cittadino EA, Kravetz FO (1997) Habitat selection and interspecific competition in rodents in pampean agroecosystems. Mammalia 61:167–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch M, Miño MH, Dadon JR, Hodara K (2001) Habitat selection by Akodon azarae and Calomys laucha (Rodentia, Muridae) in Pampean agroecosystems. Mammalia 65:167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera A (1953) Esquema Fitogeográfico de la República Argentina. Rev Museo La Plata Bot 8:87–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Caccia FD, Chaneton EJ, Kitzberger T (2006) Trophic and non-trophic pathways mediate apparent competition through post-dispersal seed predation in a Patagonian forest. Oikos 113:469–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cittadino EA, de Carli P, Busch M, Kravetz FO (1994) Effects of food supplementation on rodents in winter. J Mammal 75:446–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cittadino EA, Busch M, Kravetz FO (1998) Population abundance and dispersal in Akodon azarae (Rodentia, Muridae). Can J Zool 76:1011–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A, Mills JN, Childs JE, Muzzini MC, Mc Kee KT, Enria DA, Glass GE (1997) Structure and floristics of habitat associated with five rodent species in agroecosystem in Central Argentina. J Mammal 79:1203–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodara K, Busch M (2006) Return of preferred habitats (edges) as a function of distance in Akodon azarae (Rodentia, Muridae) in cropfield-edge systems of central Argentina. J Ethol 21:141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodara K, Busch M, Kittlein MJ, Kravetz FO (2001) Density-dependent habitat selection between maize cropfields and their borders in two rodent species (Akodon azarae and Calomys laucha) of Pampean agroecosystems. Evol Ecol 14:571–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes WG (1984) Predation risk and foraging behaviour of the hoary marmot in Alaska. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD, Kotler BP (1987) Short-term apparent competition. Am Nat 130:412–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JJ, Ward D (1993) Predation risk and distance to cover affect foraging behavior in Namib Desert gerbils. Anim Behav 46:1243–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob J, Brown JS (2000) Microhabitat use, giving-up densities and temporal activity as short- and long-term anti-predator behaviours in common voles. Oikos 91:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob J, Ylonen H, Runie MJ, Jones DA, Singleton GR (2003) What affects bait uptake by house mice in Australian grain fields? J Wildl Manag 96(2):341–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP (1992) Behavioral resource depression and decaying perceived risk of predation in two species of coexisting gerbils. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:239–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP (1997) Patch use by gerbils in a risky environment: manipulating food and safety to test four models. Oikos 78:274–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP, Brown JS, Hasson O (1991) Factors affecting gerbil foraging behavior and rates of owl predation. Ecology 72:2249–2260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP, Blaustein L, Brown JS (1992) Predator facilitation: the combined effect of snakes and owls on the foraging behavior of gerbils. Ann Zool Fenn 29:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP, Brown JS, Mitchell WA (1993) Environmental factors affecting patch use in two species of gerbilline rodents. J Mammal 74:614–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP, Brown JS, Dall SRX (2002) Foraging games between gerbils and their predators: temporal dynamics of resource depletion and apprehension in gerbils. Evol Ecol Res 4:495–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr K, Vibe-Petersen S, Lau Jeppesen L, Bilsoe M, Leirs H (2003) Foraging of multimammate mice, Mastomys natalensis, under different predation pressure: cover, patch-dependent decisions and density-dependent GUDs. Oikos 100:459–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RA, Brown JS, Thorson JM (1997) The effect of spatial scale on the functional response of fox squirrels. Ecology 78(4):1087–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris DW (1997) Optimally foraging deer mice in prairie mosaics: a test of habitat theory and absence of landscape effects. Oikos 80:31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnurr JL, Canham CD, Ostfeld RS (2004) Neighbourhood analysis of small mammal dynamics: impacts on seed predation and seedling establishment. Ecology 85:741–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soriano A, León R, Sala O, Lavado R, Deregibus V, Cauhepe M, Scaglia O, Velázquez C, Lemcoff J (1991) Río de la Plata Grassland. In: Coupland R (ed) Ecosystems of the world, vol 8A. Natural grasslands. Introduction and western hemisphere. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 367–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez RA, Grossi B, Márquez NI (2006) On the value of information: studying changes in patch assessment abilities through learning. Oikos 112:298–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner BJ (1962) Statistical principles in experimental design. MacGraw Hill, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziv Y, Kotler BP, Abramsky Z, Rosenzweig M (1995) Foraging efficiencies of competing rodents: why do gerbils exhibit shared-preference habitat selection? Oikos 73:260–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Gerardo Cueto and Beatriz Gonzalez for their statistical advice and Joel S. Brown for his useful comments on early versions of this manuscript. We also thank D. Gaynor people for their assistance during field work. We greatly acknowledge commentaries on a previous version of the manuscript by R. Cavia, M.S. Fernández, I.E. Gómez Villafañe, D. Bilenca and V. León. This work was funded by University of Buenos Aires and CONICET grants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jimena Fraschina.

About this article

Cite this article

Fraschina, J., Knight, C. & Busch, M. Foraging efficiency of Akodon azarae under different plant cover and resource levels. J Ethol 27, 447–452 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-008-0140-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-008-0140-x

Keywords

Navigation