Skip to main content
Log in

Sperm mortality, insemination and fertilization in the damselfly Ischnura senegalensis: comparisons between wild and inbred populations

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ethology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inbreeding can have deleterious effects on individual or population fitness. To avoid fitness reduction, individuals may adopt behavioral or physiological mechanisms to reduce their investment in the production of offspring with genetically similar mates. We examined whether insemination by inbred males introduced more dead sperm than insemination by wild males by counting sperm in female Ischnura senegalensis (Rambur) sperm storage organs. If inbred males inseminated fewer or lower-quality sperm, females would avoid inferior sperm. Our results revealed three features of damselfly inbreeding: insemination failed in a larger proportion of inbred pairs than in wild pairs, inbred pairs showed significantly reduced fertility, and the numbers of live and dead sperm in an inbred female’s sperm storage organs did not differ from those in wild females. These results suggested that neither sperm quantity nor sperm quality was responsible for low fertility to a significant extent, but some kind of female quality, such as sperm usage or storing ability, was. Although inbred pairs had lower fertility, there were no significant differences between inbred and wild pairs in the total numbers of live or dead sperm. It thus seemed that female choice at the insemination stage was responsible for low fertility rather than sperm quantity or quality measured by live-to-dead ratio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:237–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D (1999) The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet Res 74:329–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba-Aguilar A (2006) Sperm ejection as a possible cryptic female choice mechanism in Odonata (Insecta). Physiol Entomol 31:146–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey KG (1985) The female reproductive tract. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI (eds) Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology, vol 1. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 15–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1982) Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am Nat 119:601–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Engqvist L, Sauer KP (2001) Strategic male mating effort and cryptic male choice in a scorpionfly. Proc R Soc B 268:729–735

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi F, Tsuchiya K (2005) Functional association between female sperm storage organs and male sperm removal organs in calopterygid damselflies. Entomol Sci 8:245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter FM, Birkhead TR (2002) Sperm viability and sperm competition in insects. Curr Biol 12:121–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Hunt JH, Graham R, Brooks R (2004) No evidence for inbreeding avoidance through postcopulatory mechanisms in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus. Evolution 58:2472–2477

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack PD, Hammock BA, Promislow DEL (2002) Sperm competitive ability and genetic relatedness in Drosophila melanogaster: similarity breeds contempt. Evolution 56:1789–1795

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markow TA (1997) Assortative fertilization in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:7756–7760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1956) Fertility, mating behaviour and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura. J Genet 54:261–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson M (1997) Sperm choice by females. Trends Ecol Evol 12:445–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitnick S, Markow TA (1994) Male gametic strategies: sperm size, testes size, and the allocation of ejaculate among successive mates by the sperm-limited fly Drosophila pachea and its relatives. Am Nat 143:785–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pusey A, Wolf M (1996) Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 11:201–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt K, Siva-Jothy MT (2005) An advantage for young sperm in the house cricket Acheta domesticus. Am Nat 165:718–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold K, Kurtz J, Engqvist L (2002) Cryptic male choice: sperm allocation strategies when female quality varies. J Evol Biol 15:201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roff FA (1998) Effects of inbreeding on morphological and life history traits of the sand cricket, Gryllus firmus. Heredity 81:28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacherri IJ, Brakefield PM, Nichols RA (1996) Severe inbreeding depression and rapid fitness rebound in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana (Satyridae). Evolution 50:2000–2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saccheri IJ, Lloyd HD, Heyar SJ, Brakefield PM (2005) Inbreeding uncovers fundamental differences in the genetic load affecting male and female fertility in a butterfly. Proc R Soc B 272:39–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp PM (1984) The effect of inbreeding on competitive male-mating ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 106:601–612

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1990) Pheromonal cues for the recognition of kin by female field crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus. Anim Behav 40:192–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1991) Female choice and the relatedness of mates in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Anim Behav 41:493–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Siva-Jothy MT, Hooper RE (1996) Differential use of stored sperm during oviposition in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens xanthostoma (Charpentier). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:389–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snook RR, Markow TA (2002) Efficiency of gamete usage in nature: sperm storage, fertilization and polyspermy. Proc R Soc B 269:467–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stockley P (1999) Sperm selection and genetic incompatibility: does relatedness of mates affect male success in sperm competition? Proc R Soc B 266:1663–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1983) Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. Am Nat 122:765–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tregenza T, Wedell N (2002) Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 415:71–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsubaki Y, Yamagishi M (1991) “Longevity” of sperm within the female of the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae), and its relevance to sperm competition. J Insect Behav 4:243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twig E, Yuval B (2005) Function of multiple storage organs in female Mediterranean fruit flies (Ceratitis capitata, Diptera: Tephritidae). J Insect Physiol 51:67–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace B, Madden C (1965) Studies on inbred strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Am Nat 99:495–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildt DE, Bush M, Goodrowe KL, Packer C, Pusey AE, Brown JL, Joslin P, O’Brien SJ (1987) Reproductive and genetic consequences of founding isolated lion populations. Nature 329:328–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes A (1965) Sperm transfer and utilization by the Arrhenotolous wasp Dahlbominus fuscipennis (Zett.) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Can Entom 97:647–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes A (1966) Sperm utilization following multiple insemination in the wasp Dahlbominus fuscipennis. Can J Genet Cytol 8:451–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1996) The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc R Soc B 263:1711–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1997) The evolution of polyandry II: post-copulatory defenses against genetic incompatibility. Proc R Soc B 264:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are particularly grateful to A. Ogamino, F. Oyama, S. Karube, and S. Kawakami (Kawakami Farm) for their technical help with damselfly maintenance. We also thank K. Goka (National Institute for Environmental Studies) for advice and assistance, and P. Stockley (University of Liverpool) for valuable comments on a previous version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miri Nakahara.

About this article

Cite this article

Nakahara, M., Tsubaki, Y. Sperm mortality, insemination and fertilization in the damselfly Ischnura senegalensis: comparisons between wild and inbred populations. J Ethol 26, 145–151 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-007-0046-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-007-0046-z

Keywords

Navigation