Skip to main content
Log in

A sex difference in the behavioural response of nesting mountain bluebirds (Sialia currucoides) to a mounted predator

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Ethology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Passerine nests can benefit parental fitness, but defense against predators may be costly. Although this paradigm is well studied, no studies have been conducted on mountain bluebirds (Sialia currucoides). We observed the response of 17 bluebird pairs with nestlings to a mounted bobcat (Lynx rufus) and two controls. Bluebird pairs clearly differentiated the mounted predator and males moved closer to the bobcat than to the controls whereas females did not. This system is ideal to further refine nest-defense hypotheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Baker RR, Parker GA (1979) Evolution of bird coloration. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 287:63–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buitron D (1983) Variability in the responses of black-billed magpies to natural predators. Behaviour 87:209–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio E (1975) The functional organization of anti-predator behavior in the pied flycatcher: a study of avian visual perception. Anim Behav 23:1–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curio E, Regelmann K (1986) Predator harassment implies a real deadly risk: as reply to Hennessy. Ethology 72:75–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delibes M, Blazquez MC, Rodriguez-Estrella R, Zapata SC (1997) Seasonal food habits of bobcats (Lynx rufus) in subtropical Baja California Sur, Mexico. Can J Zool 75:478–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia PFJ, Merkle MS, Barclay RMR (1993) Energy allocation to reproduction and maintenance in mountain bluebirds (Sialia currucoides): a food supplementation experiment. Can J Zool 71:2352–2357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson KA, Bouchart ML, Sealy SG (1988) Responses of naive yellow warblers to a novel nest predator. Anim Behav 36:1823–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (2005) Sex-differences in nest defence in fieldfares Turdus pilaris in relation to their size and physical condition. Ibis 147:375–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight RL, Temple SA (1986) Why does intensity of avian nest defense increase during the nesting cycle. Auk 103:318–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1993) Ecological and evolutionary perspectives on escape from predatory attack: a survey of North American birds. Wilson Bull 105:1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean IG, Rhodes G (1991) Enemy recognition and response in birds. Curr Ornithol 8:173–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek SB, Robertson RJ, Boag PT (1994) Extrapair paternity and intraspecific brood parasitism in eastern bluebirds revealed by DNA-fingerprinting. Auk 111:739–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Michl G, Torok J, Garamszegi LZ, Toth L (2000) Sex-dependent risk taking in the collared flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis, when exposed to a predator at the nestling stage. Anim Behav 59:623–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mock PJ (1991) Daily allocation of time and energy of western bluebirds feeding nestlings. Condor 93:598–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomerie RD, Weatherhead PJ (1988) Risks and rewards of nest defense by parent birds. Q Rev Biol 63:167–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak RM (1999) Walker’s Mammals of the world. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Olendorf R, Robinson SK (2000) Effectiveness of nest defence in the Acadian flycatcher Empidonax virescens. Ibis 142:365–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavel V (2006) When do altricial birds reach maximum of their brood defence intensity. J Ethol 24:175–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearman M (2002) Mountain bluebird trail monitoring guide. Red Deer River Naturalists, Red Deer

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietz PJ, Granfors DA (2005) Parental nest defense on videotape: more reality than ‘myth’. Auk 122:701–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power HW (1966) Biology of the mountain bluebird in Montana. Condor 68:351–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs R (1969) An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smith Contrib Zool 9:1–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Rytkonen S (2002) Nest defence in great tits Parus major: support for parental investment theory. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:379–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rytkonen S, Orell M, Koivula K (1993) Sex-role reversal in willow tit nest defense. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:275–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semel B, Sherman PW, Byers SM (1988) Effects of brood parasitism and nest-box placement on wood duck breeding ecology. Condor 90:920–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tryjanowski P, Golawski A (2004) Sex differences in nest defence by the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio: effects of offspring age, brood size, and stage of breeding season. J Ethol 22:13–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann U, Curio E (1988) 2 Conflicting needs affecting predator mobbing by great tits, parus-major. Anim Behav 36:926–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. W. Gibson.

About this article

Cite this article

Gibson, K.W., Moehrenschlager, A. A sex difference in the behavioural response of nesting mountain bluebirds (Sialia currucoides) to a mounted predator. J Ethol 26, 185–189 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-007-0045-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-007-0045-0

Keywords

Navigation