Skip to main content
Log in

Barn swallows prefer to nest at sites hidden from neighboring nests within a loose colony

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ethology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some loosely colonial species scatter their nests within a colony. Most studies on mechanisms that generate such scattered nests within a colony have primarily focused on the measurement of distance related to the intensity of interactions among conspecific neighbors. However, these interactions can change not only with distance between nests but also with other factors. In particular, whether the nest is hidden from neighbors can strongly affect the intensity of interaction for birds that usually use sight for communication. To show the possible benefit of nesting at sites hidden from neighboring nests, we studied the nest arrangements and settlement patterns within a barn swallow colony. We tested whether the swallows prefer nesting at sites hidden from neighboring nests in cattle barns that are often used as colony sites by the swallows in Japan. We found that the sides of ceiling beams hidden from neighbors were preferred as nesting sites. A randomization test suggested that the rectangular sections occupied by swallows were not spaced out within a colony. The results suggested that the swallows preferred nesting sites hidden from their neighbors and did not space out their nests within a colony. This paper also refutes intraspecific brood parasitism as a plausible function of this behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrosini R, Bolzern AM, Canova L, Arieni S, Møller AP, Saino N (2002) The distribution and colony size of barn swallows in relation to agricultural land use. J Appl Ecol 39:524–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson M, Wicklund CG (1978) Clumping versus spacing out: experiments on nest predation in fieldfares (Turdus pilaris). Anim Behav 26:1207–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bent AC (1963) Life histories of North American flycatchers, larks, swallows, and their allies. Dover, New York

  • Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1992) Sperm competition in birds. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Brown MB (1988) A new form of reproductive parasitism in cliff swallows. Nature 331:66–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Brown MB (1996) Coloniality in the cliff swallow: the effect of group size on social behavior. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

  • Cramp S (ed) (1988) The birds of the western palearctic, vol. 5. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Crawley MJ (2002) Statistical computing. Wiley, Chichester, UK

  • Ewald PW, Hunt GL Jr, Warner M (1980) Territory size in western gulls: importance of intrusion pressure, defense investments, and vegetation structure. Ecology 6:80–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghent AW (2001) Regular spatial patterns of bank swallow (Riparia riparia) tunnel entrances, with some possible evolutionary implications. Am Midl Nat 146:414–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiratsuka City Museum (1983) Let’s study. Bran swallows. Hiratsuka City Museum, Hiratsuka, Japan (in Japanese)

  • Huels TR (1985) Cave swallow paired with cliff swallows. Condor 87:441–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt GL Jr, Hunt MW (1975) Reproductive ecology of the western gull: the importance of nest spacing. Auk 92:270–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpi M (1989) The effect of varying pair numbers on reproduction and use of space in a small herring gull Larus argentatus colony. Ornis Scand 20:204–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ (1997) Randomization, bootstrap and monte carlo methods in biology. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant S, PJ Fullager (1983) Nest records of the welcome swallow. Emu 83:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1983) Breeding habitat selection in the swallow Hirundo rustica. Bird Study 30:134–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1987a) Intraspecific nest parasitism and anti-parasite behavior in swallows, Hirundo rustica. Anim Behav 35:247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1987b) Advantages and disadvantages of coloniality in the swallow, Hirundo rustica. Anim Behav 35:819–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1991) Density-dependent extra-pair copulation in the swallow Hirundo rustica. Ethology 87:316–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1992) Frequency of female copulations with multiple males and sexual selection. Am Nat 139:1089–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1995) Sexual selection and barn swallows. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (2001) The effect of dairy farming on barn swallows Hirundo rustica abundance, distribution and reproduction. J Appl Ecol 38:378–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2005) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/)

  • Rushton SP, Ormerod SJ, Kerby G (2004) New paradigms for modelling species distributions? J Appl Ecol 41:193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields WM, Crook JR (1987) Barn swallow coloniality: a net cost for group breeding in the Adirondacks? Ecology 68:1373–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snapp BD (1976) Colonial breeding in the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) and its adaptive significance. Condor 78:471–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. WH Freeman, New York

  • Tinbergen N, Impekoven N, Franck D (1967) An experiment on spacing out as a defense against predation. Behaviour 28:307–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner AK (1994) The swallow. Hamlyn, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner AK, Rose C (1989) A hand book to the swallows and martins of the world. Christopher Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Sherman PW, Morton ML (1990) The ecology and evolution of extra-pair copulations in birds. Current Ornithol 7:331–369

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Etienne Danchin, Thomas Grubb Jr., Keisuke Ueda and anonymous referees for comments on the manuscript. We also thank Hironori Ueda, Katsumi Ushiyama, Yasunori Maezono, Tomonori Matsuzawa and Tadashi Fukami for their assistance in the field. The research was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Go Fujita.

About this article

Cite this article

Fujita, G., Higuchi, H. Barn swallows prefer to nest at sites hidden from neighboring nests within a loose colony. J Ethol 25, 117–123 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-006-0005-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-006-0005-0

Keywords

Navigation