Abstract
People across many societies routinely participate in physical or intellectual competitions in the absence of immediate substantial monetary or other apparent material rewards. But increased fame and social status associated with awards, such as the “Oscars”, need not be necessarily and solely a cultural construct unrelated to natural selection. Rather, prizes might be badges of honor if they are also honest indicators of evolutionary fitness. Analyses of reported reproductive success data, from a survey of well-known female and male actors, followed previously reported patterns of biological fitness in this sample of a human population. In addition, the numbers of Academy Awards received for acting were positively associated with reported numbers of biological children for both genders. The association of increased fitness with more awards received was statistically consistent even when considering that this subset of the population conformed to the Bateman effect in human reproduction: male actors had a more positive correlation than females between cumulative numbers of married partners and overall numbers of children. Honest signals of reproductive quality that are displayed by both sexes are expected to occur in humans and other species with costly biparental care and mutual mate choice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368
Buss DM (1994) The evolution of desire. Basic Books, New York
Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London
Flinn MV (1997) Culture and the evolution of social learning. Evol Hum Behav 18:23–67
Flinn MV, Geary DC, Ward CV (2005) Ecological dominance, social competition, and coalitionary arms races: why humans evolved extraordinary intelligence. Evol Hum Behav 26:10–46
Hauber ME, Lacey EA (2005) Bateman’s principle in cooperatively breeding vertebrates: the effects of non-breeding alloparents on variability of female and male reproductive success. Integr Compar Biol 45:903–914
Low BS (1999) Why sex matters: a Darwinian look at human behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Redelmeier DA, Singh SM (2001a) Survival in Academy Award winning actors and actresses. Ann Intern Med 134:955–962
Redelmeier DA, Singh SM (2001b) Longevity of screenwriters who win an Academy Award: longitudinal study. Br Med J 323:1491–1496
Ridley M (1993) The red queen: sex and the evolution of human nature. Penguin Putnam, New York
Rohwer S (1975) The social significance of avian winter plumage variability. Evolution 29:593–610
Sear R, Allal N, Mace R (2004) Height, marriage, and reproductive success in Gambian women. Res Econ Anthropol 23:203–224
Sporkin E (ed) (2002) The 100 greatest movie stars of our time. PeopleBooks, New York
Tang-Martinez Z, Ryder TB (2005) The problem with paradigms: Bateman’s worldview as a case study. Integr Compar Biol 45: 821–830
Tibbetts EA, Dale J (2004) A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp. Nature 432:218–222
Wade MJ, Shuster SM (2005) Don’t throw Bateman out with the bathwater! Integr Compar Biol 45:261–268
Zahavi A, Zahavi A (1997) The handicap principle: a missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Zuk M (2002) Sexual selections. What we can and can’t learn about sex from animals. University of California Press, Berkeley
Acknowledgements
I thank T.-L. Han with help in data collection and A. Budden, T. Grim, G. Heredia, S. Murphy, and S. Shuster for useful discussions, and an anonymous referee for extensive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Hauber, M.E. Fame, fortune, and fitness at the Academy Awards. J Ethol 25, 201–204 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-006-0002-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-006-0002-3