Journal of Ethology

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 239–246 | Cite as

Chemical mimicry of the ant Oecophylla smaragdina by the myrmecophilous spider Cosmophasis bitaeniata: Is it colony-specific?

  • Mark A. Elgar
  • Rachel A. Allan


Workers of most social insects can distinguish between nestmates and non-nestmates, and actively attack the latter if they attempt to intrude into the nest or surrounding territory. Nevertheless, there are many records of heterospecific organisms living within the nests of social insects, and they are thought to gain access through chemical mimicry. The salticid spider Cosmophasis bitaeniata lives within the leaf nests of the ant Oecophylla smaragdina, where it preys on the ant larvae. We investigated, using behavioural bioassays and chemical analyses, whether the previously reported resemblance of the cuticular hydrocarbons of ant and spider was colony-specific. Behavioural experiments revealed that the spiders can distinguish between nestmate and non-nestmate major workers and are less inclined to escape when confined with ants that are nestmates. More significantly, C. bitaeniata were more likely to capture ant larvae from nestmate minor workers than non-nestmate minor workers. The chemical analyses revealed that the cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of the spiders and the major workers of the ant colonies were colony-specific. However, the hydrocarbon profiles of C. bitaeniata do not match those of the major workers of O. smaragdina from the same colony. Perhaps the colony-specific cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of C. bitaeniata function to obtain prey from the minor workers rather than avoid eliciting aggression from the major workers.


Araneae Colony-specific signal Cuticular hydrocarbon Formicidae Nestmate recognition 



We thank Danielle Clode, Konrad Dettner, Laurent Keller, Ellen van Wilgenburg and some anonymous referees for their advice and comments on the manuscript; Trevor Anderson, Mark Blows and Richard Rowe for the use of their facilities at James Cook University; Valerie Todd Davies for identifying the spider and the financial support of the Australian Research Council (grant A19331563).


  1. Aitchison J (1986) The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan RA, Elgar MA (2001) Exploitation of the green tree ant Oecophylla smaragdina by the salticid spider Cosmophasis bitaeniata. Aust J Zool 49:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allan RA, Capon RJ, Brown V, Elgar MA (2002) Mimicry of host cuticular hydrocarbons by a spider that preys on ant larvae. J Chem Ecol 28:835–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Blum MS (1969) Alarm pheromones. Annu Rev Entomol 14:57–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonavita-Cougourdan A, Clement J-L, Lange C (1993) Functional subcaste discrimination (foragers and brood-tenders) in the ant Camponotus vagus Scop.: polymorphism of cuticular hydrocarbon patterns. J Chem Ecol 19:1461–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boulay R, Katzav-Gozansky T, Hefetz A, Lenoir A (2004) Odour convergence and tolerance between nestmates through trophallaxis and grooming in the ant Camponotus fellah (Dalla Torre). Insect Soc 51:55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown WV, Watson JAL, Lacey MJ, Morton R, Miller LR (1996) Composition of cuticular hydrocarbons in the Australian harvester termite Drepanotermes perniger (Isoptera: Termitidae): variation among individuals, castes, colonies and locations. Sociobiology 27:181–197Google Scholar
  8. Cushing PE (1995) Description of the spider Masoncus pogonophilus (Araneae, Linyphiidae): a harvester ant myrmecophile. J Arachnol 23:55–59Google Scholar
  9. Cushing PE (1997) Myrmecomorphy and myrmecophily in spiders: a review. Fla Entomol 80:165–193Google Scholar
  10. Dahbi A, Cerdá X, Hefetz A, Lenoir A (1996) Social closure, aggressive behaviour, and cuticular hydrocarbon profiles in the polydomous ant Cataglyphis iberica (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). J Chem Ecol 22:2173–2186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dettner K, Liepert C (1994) Chemical mimicry and camouflage. Annu Rev Entomol 39:129–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. D’Ettorre P, Mondy N, Lenoir A, Errard C (2002) Blending in with the crowd: social parasites integrate into their host colonies using a flexible chemical signature. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1911–1918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elgar MA (1993) Inter-specific associations involving spiders. Mem Queensl Mus 33:411–430Google Scholar
  14. Elgar MA, Allan RA (2004) Spider chemical mimics acquire colony-specific cuticular hydrocarbons from their ant model prey. Naturwissenschaften 91:143–147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Foelix RF (1982) Biology of spiders. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Hölldobler B (1983) Territorial behaviour in the green tree ant (Oecophylla smaragdina). Biotropica 15:241–250Google Scholar
  17. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Howard RW, Perez-Lachaud G, Lachaud JP (2001) Cuticular hydrocarbons of Kapala sulcifacies (Hymenoptera: Eucharitidae) and its host, the ponerine ant Ectatomma ruidum (Hymenoptera : Formicidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 94:707–716Google Scholar
  19. Kaib M, Jmhasly P, Wilfert L, Durka W, Franke S, Francke W, Leuthold RH, Brandl R (2004) Cuticular hydrocarbons and aggression in the termite Macrotermes subhyalinus. J Chem Ecol 30:365–385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Keegans SJ, Bille J, Morgan ED (1991) Volatile secretions of the green tree ant Oecophylla smaragdina (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Comp Biochem Physiol 100B:681–685Google Scholar
  21. Layton JM, Camann MA, Espelie KE (1994) Cuticular lipid profiles of queens, workers, and males of social wasp Polistes metricus Say are colony specific. J Chem Ecol 20:2307–2321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lenoir A, D’Ettorre P, Errard C, Hefetz A (2001) Chemical ecology and social parasitism in ants. Annu Rev Entomol 46:573–599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Liang D, Silverman J (2000) “You are what you eat”: diet modifies cuticular hydrocarbons and nestmate recognition in the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile. Naturwissenschaften 87:412–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu ZB, Yamane S, Yamamoto H, Wang QC (2000) Nestmate discrimination and cuticular profiles of a temporary parasitic ant Lasius sp. and its host L. fuliginosus (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). J Ethol 18:69–73Google Scholar
  25. Liu ZB, Bagneres AG, Yamane S, Wang QC, Kojima J (2001) Intra-colony, inter-colony and seasonal variations of cuticular hydrocarbon profiles in Formica japonica (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect Soc 48:342–346Google Scholar
  26. Lokkers C (1986) The distribution of the weaver ant Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in northern Australia. Aust J Zool 34:683–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meskali M, Bonavita-Cougourdan A, Provost E, Bagneres A-G, Dusticier G, Clement J-L (1995) Mechanisms underlying cuticular hydrocarbon homogeneity in the ant Camponotus vulgus (Scop.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): role of postpharyngeal glands. J Chem Ecol 21:1127–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nielsen J, Boomsma JJ, Oldham NJ, Petersen HC, Morgan ED (1999) Colony-level and season-specific variation in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of individual workers in the ant Formica truncorum. Insect Soc 46:58–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Porter SD (1985) Masoncus spider: a miniature predator of collembola in harvester ant colonies. Psyche 92:145–150Google Scholar
  30. Schlick-Steiner BC, Steiner FM, Hottinger H, Nikiforov A, Mistrik R, Schafellner C, Baier P, Christian E (2004) A butterfly’s chemical key to various ant forts: intersection-odour or aggregate-odour multi-host mimicry? Naturwissenschaften 91:209–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Singer TL, Camann MA, Espelie KE (1992) Discriminant analysis of cuticular hydrocarbons of social wasp Polistes exclamans Viereck and surface hydrocarbons of its nest paper and pedicel. J Chem Ecol 18:785–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sledge MF, Dani FR, Cervo R, Dapporto L, Turillazzi S (2001) Recognition of social parasites as nest-mates: adoption of colony-specific host cuticular odours by the paper wasp parasite Polistes sulcifer. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2253–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Slifer EH (1970) The structure of arthropod chemoreceptors. Annu Rev Entomol 15:121–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith BH, Breed MD (1995) The chemical basis for nest-mate recognition and mate discrimination in social insects. In: Cardé RT, Bell WJ (eds) Chemical ecology of insects, vol. 2. Chapman, London, pp 287–317Google Scholar
  35. Soroker V, Vienne C, Hefetz A (1995) Hydrocarbon dynamics within and between nestmates in Cataglyphis niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Chem Ecol 21:365–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Su N-Y, Haverty M (1991) Agonistic behaviour among colonies of the Formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae), from Florida and Hawaii: lack of correlation with cuticular hydrocarbon composition. J Insect Behav 4:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomas ML, Parry LJ, Allan RA, Elgar MA (1999) Colony recognition in Australian meat ants Iridomyrmex purpureus. Naturwissenchaften 86:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vienne C, Soroker V, Hefetz A (1995) Congruency of hydrocarbon patterns in heterospecific groups of ants: transfer and/or biosynthesis. Insect Soc 42:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wagner D, Tissot M, Cuevas W, Gordon DM (2000) Harvester ants utilize cuticular hydrocarbons in nestmate recognition. J Chem Ecol 26:2245–2257CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations