Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors associated with medical waste under pandemic situation: a case study of the Kingdom of Bahrain

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exploring the factors influencing medical waste generation is vital for proper management due to its hazardous nature. Improper treatment would cause secondary environmental pollution, especially related to public health emergencies. However, there is not enough research on exploring COVID-19-associated factors with medical waste generation, and there is a lack of basic understanding of implementing governmental policies related to the pandemic. The medical waste generated due to COVID-19 is directly or indirectly influenced by government policies. The aim of this study is to explore the factors associated with COVID-19 that impact the amount of medical waste in Bahrain. Data about the quantities of COVID-19 waste (CW) from February 2020 to May 2022 were obtained from Bahrain Waste Treatment Company BWTC. Data about predictors related to COVID-19 were obtained from the public domain. The structural equation modeling SEM technique was applied using AMOS software to identify the driving forces. The model results revealed that the vaccination and newly infected cases are statistically significant predictors for waste generation during the pandemic, with standardized coefficients of 0.77 and 0.20, respectively. But the factors, number of tests, and deaths are not statistically significant. Moreover, the stringency index factor moderates the relationship between the CW and the two predictors, vaccination and new cases. In dealing with this sudden increase in medical waste, the incineration facility has been outstripped and faced immense pressure over handling medical waste generated during COVID-19. Therefore, this study recommends increasing the number of medical waste facilities.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dewi O et al (2019) Characteristics and factors associated with medical waste management behaviour in private dental health services in Pekanbaru city, Indonesia. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 7(1):157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eslami A, Nowrouz P, Sheikholeslami S (2017) Status and challenges of medical waste management in hospitals of Iran. Civil Eng J 3(9):741–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Manyele S, Lyasenga T (2010) Factors affecting medical waste management in lowlevel health facilities in Tanzania SV. Afr J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.4314/thrb.v12i4.53362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilujeng SA, Damanhuri E, Chaerul M (2019) Medical waste management in private clinics in Surabaya and factors affecting it. GEOMATE J 16(55):34–39

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng Y et al (2009) Medical waste production at hospitals and associated factors. Waste Manage 29(1):440–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Askarian M, Vakili M, Kabir G (2004) Results of a hospital waste survey in private hospitals in Fars province. Iran Waste Manage 24(4):347–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bdour A et al (2007) Assessment of medical wastes management practice: a case study of the northern part of Jordan. Waste Manage 27(6):746–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher S (2005) Healthcare waste management in the UK: the challenges facing healthcare waste producers in light of changes in legislation and increased pressures to manage waste more efficiently. Waste Manage 25(6):572–574

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mohee R (2005) Medical wastes characterisation in healthcare institutions in Mauritius. Waste Manage 25(6):575–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ma Y et al (2022) The impact of economic growth and tiered medical policy on the medical waste generation: an empirical analysis based on the environmental kuznets curve model. Front Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.824435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wei Y et al (2021) Environmental challenges from the increasing medical waste since SARS outbreak. J Clean Prod 291:125246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ansari M et al (2019) Dynamic assessment of economic and environmental performance index and generation, composition, environmental and human health risks of hospital solid waste in developing countries; a state of the art of review. Environ Int 132:105073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Portal KoBsN (2022) Combating COVID-19. 1/9/2022; Available from: https://www.bahrain.bh/new/en/eservices-explore_en.html?

  14. Data OWi (2022) Bahrain: Coronavirus Pandemic Country Profile. 20/6/2022; Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus/country/bahrain

  15. ADB (2020) Managing infectious medical waste during the COVID-19 pandemic. Available from: https://www.adb.org/publications/managing-medical-waste-covid19

  16. Al-Omran K et al (2021) Estimation of COVID-19 generated medical waste in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Sci Total Environ 801:149642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Purnomo CW, Kurniawan W, Aziz M (2021) Technological review on thermochemical conversion of COVID-19-related medical wastes. Resour Conserv Recycl 167:105429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Omran K, Khan E, Perna S (2023) Medical waste generation during COVID-19 pandemic in selected member countries of Arabian Gulf region; Google trend analysis. Arab J Basic Appl Sci 30(1):79–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Data OWi (2022) Share of people vaccinated against COVID-19, Sep 17, 2022. 17/9/2022; Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&facet=none&pickerSort=desc&pickerMetric=population&hideControls=true&Interval=Cumulative&Relative+to+Population=true&Color+by+test+positivity=false&country=~BHR&Metric=People+vaccinated+%28by+dose%29

  20. Phadke R et al (2021) Eco-friendly vaccination: tackling an unforeseen adverse effect. J Clim Change Health 1:100005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. WHO (2020) Infection prevention and control for the safe management of a dead body in the context of COVID-19: interim guidance, 4 September 2020. World Health Organization

  22. Baller A, Coninx R, Eamer G (2020) COVID-19 interim guidance for the management of the dead in humanitarian settings

  23. Yaacoub S et al (2020) Safe management of bodies of deceased persons with suspected or confirmed COVID-19: a rapid systematic review. BMJ Glob Health 5(5):e002650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. WHO (2020) Infection prevention and control during health care when coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is suspected or confirmed: interim guidance, 29 June 2020. 30/9/2022; Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332879

  25. Chowdhury T et al (2022) Estimation of the healthcare waste generation during COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh. Sci Total Environ 811:152295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bashir MF, Ma B, Shahzad L (2020) A brief review of socio-economic and environmental impact of Covid-19. Air Qual Atmos Health 13(12):1403–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Teymourian T et al (2021) Challenges, strategies, and recommendations for the huge surge in plastic and medical waste during the global COVID-19 pandemic with circular economy approach. Mater Circ Econ 3(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. MOH (2021) All services provided at the Bahrain International Exhibition and Convention Centre will be transferred to Bahrain International Hospital and Sitra Mall starting Monday, 20 September 2021. 25/9/2022; Available from: https://healthalert.gov.bh/en/article/News-248961

  29. Shi J et al (2018) Using behavior and willingness of urban transportation sharing products from the perspective of sustainable development. China Popul Environ 28:63–72

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dragan A, Akhtar-Danesh N (2007) Relation between body mass index and depression: a structural equation modeling approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 7(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. da Rosa FS et al (2021) Environmental innovation and the food, energy and water nexus in the food service industry. Resour Conserv Recycl 166:105350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rathore P, Sarmah S (2021) Investigation of factors influencing source separation intention towards municipal solid waste among urban residents of India. Resour Conserv Recycl 164:105164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schreiber JB et al (2006) Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. J Educ Res 99(6):323–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shen L et al (2019) Factors influencing young people’s intention toward municipal solid waste sorting. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(10):1708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bank TW (2022) World Developement Indicators. 1/7/2022; Available from: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

  36. Portal KoBsN (2022) Healthcare. 15/9/2022; Available from: https://www.bahrain.bh/new/en/health_en.html

  37. MOH (2022) COVID-19 PROTOCOLS. 15/9/2022; Available from: https://healthalert.gov.bh/en/category/covid-19-protocols

  38. Agency BN (2020) Ministry of Health confirms first case of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Bahrain. 25/9/2022; Available from: https://www.bna.bh/en/COVID19.aspx?cms=q8FmFJgiscL2fwIzON1%2BDgdRwjYzx8yqJfGfSBhU4yI%3D

  39. MOH (2022) Daily COVID-19 Report. 30/9/2022; Available from: https://healthalert.gov.bh/en/category/daily-covid-19-report

  40. MOH (2020) Optional home self-Isolation for asymptomatic active COVID-19 cases. 220/7/2022; Available from: https://healthalert.gov.bh/en/article/News-862576#:~:text=The%20Taskforce%20noted%20that%20in,beds%2C%20with%20487%20being%20occupied

  41. Link-Gelles R et al (2022) Association between COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and COVID-19 illness and severity during Omicron BA. 4 and BA. 5 sublineage periods. medRxiv

  42. Charles E (1994) A step-by-step approach to using the SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modelling. Technometrics 38:296–297

    Google Scholar 

  43. Awang Z (2014) Analyzing the effect of a moderator in a model: the multi-group CFA procedure in SEM. In Proceedings of the Academic Colloquium for Academicians & Postgraduates, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia.

  44. Hayes AF, Rockwood NJ (2020) Conditional process analysis: concepts, computation, and advances in the modeling of the contingencies of mechanisms. Am Behav Sci 64(1):19–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Warner RM (2012) Applied statistics: from bivariate through multivariate techniques. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  46. Memon MA et al (2019) Moderation analysis: issues and guidelines. J Appl Struct Equ Model 3(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  47. McKinley CJ et al (2018) Nutrition knowledge, personal motivation, and food label use among indian adults with multiple chronic conditions: a moderated mediation model.

  48. Abedin MJ et al (2022) Amassing the Covid-19 driven PPE wastes in the dwelling environment of Chittagong Metropolis and associated implications. Chemosphere 297:134022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Windfeld ES, Brooks MS-L (2015) Medical waste management—a review. J Environ Manage 163:98–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhao L et al (2010) Typical pollutants in bottom ashes from a typical medical waste incinerator. J Hazard Mater 173(1–3):181–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. SCE (2012) Bahrain national profile to assess the national infrastructure for chemical safety. 2012.

  52. Singh N et al (2020) COVID-19 waste management: effective and successful measures in Wuhan, China. Resour Conserv Recycl 163:105071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mihai F-C (2020) Assessment of COVID-19 waste flows during the emergency state in Romania and related public health and environmental concerns. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(15):5439

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Management of BWTC especially Mr. Patrick BARNAY, for his valuable discussion during the site visit.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ezzat Khan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 161 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Omran, K., Khan, E., Perna, S. et al. Factors associated with medical waste under pandemic situation: a case study of the Kingdom of Bahrain. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 25, 2951–2963 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01728-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01728-2

Keywords

Navigation