Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does farmer entrepreneurship promote willingness to participate in domestic waste management? An empirical analysis from China

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the impact of farmer entrepreneurship (FAE) on the willingness of farmers to participate in domestic waste management (DWM) using farm household data from the China Labor-force Dynamic Survey (CLDS). The results show that (1) FAE can significantly boost the willingness to participate in DWM, and the conclusion still holds after adopting the CMP (conditional mixed process) model to solve the endogeneity problem. (2) From the perspective of entrepreneurial motivation, opportunity-driven entrepreneurs (ODEs) are more willing to participate in DWM than necessity-driven entrepreneurs (NDEs). In terms of the education level of rural residents, those with high levels of education (HEDU) are more likely to participate in DWM than those with low levels of education (LEDU). (3) Socioeconomic status (SES) and sociometric status (SMS) play a mediating role between FAE and willingness to participate in DWM. In other words, FAE can improve the willingness to manage domestic waste by enhancing SESs and SMSs. This study provides empirical evidence and policy implications on how to promote rural DWM and improve rural habitat in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Forward Industrial Research Institute. Report of Prospects and Investment Forecast on China Life Garbage Disposaling Industry (2018–2023). Available online: https://www.qianzhan.com/analyst/detail/220/180503-a4a034ae.html (accessed on 10 March 2022). (in Chinese)

  2. Schiopu A-M, Gavrilescu M (2010) Options for the treatment and management of municipal landfill leachate common and specific issues. CLEAN–Soil Air Water 38(12):1101–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang L, Yan DY, Xiong Y et al (2019) A review of the challenges and application of public-private partnership model in Chinese garbage disposal industry. J Clean Prod 230:219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Han ZY, Ye CW, Zhang Y et al (2019) Characteristics and management modes of domestic waste in rural areas of developing countries: a case study of China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(9):8485–8501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development). Notice on Further Improvement of Urban Environ-Mental Health Work. Available online: http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/gongkai/fdzdgknr/tzgg/202003/20200323_244555.html(Accessed 23 January 2022). (in Chinese)

  6. Ma J, Hipel KW, Hanson ML (2018) An evaluation of the social dimensions in public participation in rural domestic waste source-separated collection in guilin. China Environ Monit Assess 190(1):35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao X, Sun H, Chen B et al (2019) China’s rural human settlements: qualitative evaluation, quantitative analysis and policy implications. Ecol Ind 105:398–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xie JH, Yang GQ, Wang G et al (2021) How do network embeddedness and environmental awareness affect farmers’ participation in improving rural human settlements? Land 10(10):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schultz PW, Oskamp S, Mainieri T (1995) Who recycles and when? a review of personal and situational factors. J Environ Psychol 15(2):105–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ma QZ, Huang DJ, Li H et al (2021) Effects of fiscal decentralization on garbage classifications. Front Energy Res 9:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stern PC, Dietz T, Kalof L et al (1995) Values, beliefs, and pro-environmental action: attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. J Appl Soc Psychol 25(18):1611–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zeng C, Niu DJ, Li HF et al (2016) Public perceptions and economic values of source-collection of rural solid waste: a pilot study in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 107:166–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang Y, Hao F (2020) Public perception matters: individual waste sorting in Chinese communities. Resour Conserv Recycl 159(8):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cecere G, Mancinelli S, Mazzanti M (2014) Waste prevention and social preferences: the role of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. Ecol Econ 107:163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu L, Ling ML, Wu YL (2018) Economic incentive and social influence to overcome household waste separation dilemma: a field intervention study. Waste Manage 77:522–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu Y, Huang J (2014) Rural domestic waste disposal: an empirical analysis in five provinces of China. China Agric Econ Rev 6(4):558–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li XR, Bi F, Han ZD et al (2019) Garbage source classification performance, impact factor, and management strategy in rural areas of China: a case study in Hangzhou. Waste Manage 89:313–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Elahi E, Zhang HX, Xing LR, Khalid Z, Xu HY (2021) Understanding cognitive and socio-psychological factors determining farmers’ intentions to use improved grassland: Implications of land use policy for sustainable pasture production. Land Use Policy 102:105250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Akgün AA, Nijkamp P, Baycan T (2010) Embeddedness of entrepreneurs in rural areas: a comparative rough set data analysis. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 101(5):538–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Naminse EY, Zhuang JC, Zhu FY (2019) The relation between entrepreneurship and rural poverty alleviation in China. Manag Decis 57(9):2593–2611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Han ZY, Liu D, Lei YH et al (2015) Characteristics and management of domestic waste in the rural area of southwest China. Waste Manage Res 33(1):39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Han ZY, Zeng D, Li QB et al (2019) Public willingness to pay and participate in domestic waste management in rural areas of China. Resour Conserv Recycl 140:166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. Questions from Reporters on “Opinions on the In-Depth Implementation of the Action of Cultivating Rural Innovation and Entrepreneurship Leaders”. Available online: http://www.moa.gov.cn/xw/zwdt/202006/t20200618_6346701.htm (Accessed 18 February 2022). (in Chinese)

  24. Liu ZY, Liu XT, Liu ZH (2022) Does depression affect entrepreneurial exit? —micro-evidence from Chinese peasant entrepreneurs. Nankai Bus Rev 25(01):92–106 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Badulescu A, Hatos R (2013) Entrepreneurship Versus Self-Employment in the Context of Social Changes in Romania: Individual and Contextual Factors. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Innovation & Entrepreneurship (ECIE 2013) 1,45–51. Available online: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/alldb/full-record/WOS:000343654100006 (Accessed 6 February 2022).

  26. Ľapinová E (2019) Importance of Human Capital and Potential in Regional Development. 12th International Scientific Conference on Reproduction of Human Capital-Mutual Links and Connections (RELIK) 277–292. Available online: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/alldb/full-record/WOS:000630167900025(Accessed 3 January 2022).

  27. Islam A (2015) Entrepreneurship and the allocation of government spending under imperfect markets. World Dev 79:108–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tian Y, Du W, Hua YW et al (2021) Will infrastructure construction drive Chinese rural families to develop their own enterprises? Appl Econ Lett. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.1956677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mihalic T (2013) Performance of environmental resources of a tourist destination: concept and application. J Travel Res 52(5):614–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Esparon M, Stoeckl N, Farr M et al (2015) The significance of environmental values for destination competitiveness and sustainable tourism strategy making: insights from Australia’s great barrier reef world heritage area. J Sustain Tour 23(5):706–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lukoseviciute G, Panagopoulos T (2021) Management priorities from tourists’ perspectives and beach quality assessment as tools to support sustainable coastal tourism. Ocean Coast Manag 208:105646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Svoradova L, Palkechova L, Viragh R (2013) Rural tourism and agrotourism in the Slovak Republic. Proceedings from VIII, International Conference on Applied Business Research (ICABR) 534–546. Available online: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/alldb/fullrecord/WOS:000337230600050 (Accessed 6 January 2022).

  33. Hutton G, Rodriguez UE, Napitupulu L et al (2010) Economic impacts of sanitation in southeast Asia: summary. Policy Res Work Pap. 96(11):50–55

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mensah M, Fosu-Mensah BY, Yirenya-Tawiah D (2014) Assessing public perception of beach quality for ecotourism development: a case study in kokrobite beach in the greater accra region, ghana. J Environ Earth Sci 4(11):58–66

    Google Scholar 

  35. Skouloudis A, Jones N, Roumeliotis S et al (2017) Industrial pollution, spatial stigma and economic decline: the case of Asopos river basin through the lens of local small business owners. J Environ Plan Manage 60(9):1575–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gurbuz IB, Ozkan G (2020) Integrated environmental impact and risk assessment in rural women entrepreneurs. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(19):23837–23848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lu X, Zhang FH (2010) Study on the motivation mechanism of corporate environmental management. Proceedings of the 6th Euro-Asia Conference on Environment and CSR: Technological Innovation and Management Science Session (4):47–52. Available online: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/alldb/full-record/WOS:000282044400009 (Accessed 8 January 2022).

  38. Graskemper V, Yu XH, Feil JH (2021) Analyzing strategic entrepreneurial choices in agriculture-empirical evidence from Germany. Agribusiness 37(3):569–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hitt MA, Bierman L, Shimizu K et al (2001) Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: a resource-based perspective. Acad Manag J 44(1):13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ahmed FU, Brennan L (2019) The impact of founder’s human capital on firms’ extent of early internationalisation: evidence from a least-developed country. Asia Pac J Manag 36(3):615–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Khoshmaram M, Shiri N, Shinnar RS et al (2020) Environmental support and entrepreneurial behavior among iranian farmers: the mediating roles of social and human capital. J Small Bus Manage 58(5):1064–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sun LX, Yang S, Li SM et al (2020) Does education level affect individuals’ environmentally conscious behavior? evidence from mainland China. Soc Behav Pers 48(9):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  43. GEM (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2018–2019) Global Report. Available online: https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-2018-2019-global-report(Accessed 21 January 2022).

  44. Ranjan R (2019) How socio-economic and natural resource inequality impedes entrepreneurial ventures of farmers in rural India. Eur J Dev Res 31(3):433–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Avila YT, Schmutzler J, Rodriguez PBM et al (2021) The relationship between innovation and informal entrepreneurship: evidence from a developing country. Academia-Revista Latinoamericana De Administracion 34(3):343–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Anderson C, Kraus MW, Galinsky AD et al (2012) The local-ladder effect: social status and subjective well-being. Psychol Sci 23(7):764–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Blau PM, Duncan OD (1967) The American occupational structure. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bradley RH, Corwyn RF (2002) Socioeconomic status and child development. Annu Rev Psychol 53:371–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Anderson C, John OP, Keltner D et al (2001) Who attains social status? effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. J Pers Soc Psychol 81(1):116–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Dong LM, Guo JX (2017) The concept of face and rural governance in a rural society. Soc Sci China 8:147–160 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sone P, Bardhan D, Kumar A (2015) Role of goats in livelihood of rural poor in Uttarakhand hills: an analysis with special reference to multivariate typology of households based on farm and socio-economic characteristics. Indian J Anim Sci 85(8):97–103

    Google Scholar 

  52. Crepon B, Devoto F, Duflo E et al (2014) Estimating the impact of microcredit on those who take it up: evidence from a randomized experiment in Morocco. Am Econ J Appl Econ 7(1):123–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Nain MS, Singh R, Mishra JR et al (2019) Maximising farm profitability through entrepreneurship development and farmer’s innovations: feasibility analysis and action interventions. Indian J Agric Sci 89(6):1044–1049

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wolf SA (2008) Professionalization of agriculture and distributed innovation for multifunctional landscapes and territorial development. Agric Hum Values 25(2):203–207

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  55. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Quart J Econ 110(2):353–377

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Han ZY, Duan QQ, Fei YQ et al (2018) Factors that influence public awareness of domestic waste characteristics and management in rural areas. Integr Environ Assess Manag 14(3):395–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wang JX, Li YM, Huang KX et al (2011) Treatment situation and determinants of rural domestic waste. China Popul Resour Environ 21(6):74–78 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ting-Toomey S, Kurogi A (1988) Facework competence in intercultural conflict: an updated face-negotiation theory. Int J Intercult Relat 22(2):187–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Chen HW, Li B, Liu ZY (2018) Farmers’ entrepreneurial behaviors, village social status and farmer’s subjective well-being: an empirical analysis based on the data of the “1000 villages survey in China.” J Agrotech Econ 10:57–65 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Li JJ, Su CT (2007) How face influences consumption: a comparative study of American and Chinese consumers. Int J Mark Res 49(2):237–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Oetzel J, Garcia AJ, Ting-Toomey S (2008) An analysis of the relationships among face concerns and facework behaviors in perceived conflict situations a four-culture investigation. Int J Confl Manag 19(4):382–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Lee DS, Card D (2008) Regression discontinuity inference with specification error. J Econom 142(2):655–674

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  63. Elahi E, Khalid Z (2022) Estimating smart energy inputs packages using hybrid optimisation technique to mitigate environmental emissions of commercial fish farms. Appl Energy 326:119602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Liu XG, Wang ZH, Li W et al (2019) Mechanisms of public education influencing waste classification willingness of urban residents. Resour Conserv Recycl 149:381–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ma WL, Zhu ZK (2021) Internet use and willingness to participate in garbage classification: an investigation of Chinese residents. Appl Econ Lett 28(9):788–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Holtz-eakin D, Joulfaian D, Rosen S (1994) Entrepreneurial decisions and liquidity constraints. Rand J Econ 25(2):334–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Cagetti M, Nardi MD (2006) Entrepreneurship, frictions, and wealth. J Polit Econ 114(5):835–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Huang SL, Hou JW, Sun L et al (2017) The effects of objective and subjective socioeconomic status on subjective well-being among rural-to-urban migrants in China: the moderating role of subjective social mobility. Front Psychol 8:819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Reynolds P, Bosma N, Autio E et al (2005) Global entrepreneurship monitor: data collection design and implementation 1998–2003. Small Bus Econ 24(3):205–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Yang C, He XG, Wang BL (2021) Elite background and rural entrepreneurship: fame or fortune? South China J Econ 04:69–85 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China, ZR2021MG048, Lirong Xing

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Qi, Y., Wang, K. et al. Does farmer entrepreneurship promote willingness to participate in domestic waste management? An empirical analysis from China. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 25, 2037–2048 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01658-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01658-z

Keywords

Navigation