Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management scenario: a case study in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since to 1990, Urbanization has occurred due to an increase in the number of unpredicted citizens and migration from the countryside to the city. This has resulted in the development of factories, lack of public transportation, and the expansion of the traditional tent (ger) area. Besides that, as the lifestyle and socio-economic situation of the citizens is changing, in this regards amount of the municipal waste and type of waste are also increasing. This research analyzed each of the waste disposal methods, to develop and select the waste management best option. Also, scenario analysis to forecast the future evolution of municipal solid waste until 2030 under a different waste management plan. The waste management model was developed intending to promote sustainable decision-making, covering four columns: technical, environmental, economic, and social aspects. For it, the System Dynamics to design a mathematical model was based on the waste disposal data from 2011 to 2018. The first, based on the municipal waste disposal budget data, comprises systems engineering models including cost–benefit analysis, forecasting analysis of each scenario exploring opportunities to increase waste revenues and reducing annual costs from waste transportation, collection services, and waste treatment. The second introduces system assessment tools including Life Cycle Inventory (LCI), Scenario Development (SD), Material Flow Analysis (MFA), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA), and Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA). IPCC-2006 package was used to support the LCA and Emission Quantification Tool (EQT). The analysis includes a LCA, wherein direct and indirect Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during landfilling, waste incineration, Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT) processing, composting, recycling, and the overall energy consumption from Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) treatment system were considered for the city. In this research, a questionnaire survey has been conducted for experts and Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), the technique, helped to capture the knowledge of the local experts. Also, using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and ranked various waste disposal methods. As the result, the possibility of changing the management system that incurs losses each year to cover the costs of waste transportation, waste sorting, and recycling can be offset by waste management activities rather than the state budget. The results have shown that waste incineration is the most cost-effective option in Ulaanbaatar city in terms of saving coal resources and reducing coal production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Battsengel E, Murayama T, Nishikizawa S, Chonokhuu S (2021) Evaluation of daily behaviors related to health risks of the ger residents in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Sustainability 13:4817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Byamba B, Ishikawa M (2017) Municipal solid waste management in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia: systems analysis. Sustainability 9:896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Batkhuyag S, Tuuguu T, Dote E (2016) Characteristics of household waste and coal ash in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Society of Material Cycle and Waste Management

  4. Murun T (2015) Extended producer responsibility program for household hazardous waste management and human health risk assessment in developing countries: Ulaanbaatar city, Mongolia

  5. JICA conducted a Study “The Study on Solid waste management plan for Ulaanbaatar city in Mongolia”

  6. Hermanna BG, Kroezea C (2007) Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis, and environmental performance indicators. J Clean Prod 15(18):1787–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lai Y-J, Liu T-Y, Hwang C-L (1994) Theory and methodology TOPSIS for MODM. Eur J Oper Res 76(3):486–500

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Montejoa C, Toninib D, del Carmen Marquesan M, Astrupb TF (2015) Mechanical–biological treatment: performance and potentials. An LCA of MBT plants including waste characterization

  9. Diaz R, Warith M (2006) Life-cycle assessment of municipal solid wastes: development of the WASTED model. Waste Manag 26:886–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hazelrigg GA (2003) Validation of engineering design alternative selection methods. Eng Optim 35(2):103–120

  11. Yang JB, Wang J, Xu DL, Dale BG, Kieran O, Ruxton T (2009) Multiple criteria decision analysis applied to safety and cost synthesis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(9):2263–2278

Download references

Funding

Kitakyushu Foundation for the Advancement of Industry, Science and Technology

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delgermaa Gombojav.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gombojav, D., Matsumoto, T. Multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management scenario: a case study in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 25, 1344–1358 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01603-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01603-0

Keywords

Navigation