Skip to main content
Log in

Digested wastewater sludge dewatering process using water treatment plants chemical sludge and walnut shell activated carbon powder

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the feasibility of employing polyelectrolyte simultaneously by thickened sludge of water treatment plants (STS), water treatment plant dewatered sludge (DBS), and walnut shells activated carbon powder (WSCA) was investigated in a laboratory scale for wastewater sludge dewatering process. Compressibility, filtration yield, specific resistance to filterability (SRF), time to filter (TTF), extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), zeta potential, and particle size have been considered as the most important affecting parameters. Singly used cationic polyelectrolyte decreased SRF and TTF by 52% and 44%. Combining WSCA, STS, and DBS with cationic polyelectrolyte reduced the SRF to 91, 78, and 75%, and the TTF to 73.5, 59, and 46%, respectively. By destroying the EPS and decreasing the rate of protein/polysaccharides, WSCA, STS, and DBS reduce zeta potential (85, 91, and 86%). Moreover, its use decreased the compressibility coefficient by 58, 50, and 56%, and increased the filtration yield by 523, 269, and 160%, respectively. The WSCA acts significantly as a physical conditioner and increases particles' mean size significantly more than any other conditioner and improved filtration yield which has the most effect on the wastewater sludge dewatering process. The STS and DBS act as physical–chemical conditioners, neutralizing surface charges, and making porous sludge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

STS:

Thickened sludge of water treatment plants

DBS:

Water treatment plant dewatered sludge

WSCA:

Walnut shells activated carbon powder

SRF:

Specific resistance to filterability

TTF:

Time to filter

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

EPS:

Extracellular polymeric substances

LB-EPS:

Loosely bound EPS

S-EPS:

Soluble-EPS

TB-EPS:

Tightly bound EPS

TOC:

Total organic carbon

PN:

Protein

PS:

Polysaccharides

References

  1. Abdel-Shafy HI, Mansour MSM (2018) Solid waste issue: sources, composition, disposal, recycling, and valorization. Egypt J Pet 27(4):1275–1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. APHA (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22nd edition. In: (Rice RBBEW, Eaton AD, Clesceri LS (eds) Washington D.C: American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA) and Water Environment Federation (WEF).

  3. Assi A, Bilo F, Federici S, Zacco A, Depero LE, Bontempi E (2020) Bottom ash derived from municipal solid waste and sewage sludge co-incineration: first results about characterization and reuse. Waste Manag 116:147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ayilara MS, Olanrewaju OS, Babalola OO, Odeyemi O (2020) Waste management through composting: challenges and potentials. Sustainability 12(11):4456–4456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Badalians Gholikandi G, Zakizadeh N, Masihi H (2018) Application of peroxymonosulfate-ozone advanced oxidation process for simultaneous waste-activated sludge stabilization and dewatering purposes: a comparative study. J Environ Manage 206:523–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Buyukkamaci N, Kucukselek E (2007) Improvement of dewatering capacity of a petrochemical sludge. J Hazard Mater 144(1–2):323–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cao B, Wang R, Zhang W, Wu H, Wang D (2019) Carbon-based materials reinforced waste activated sludge electro-dewatering for synchronous fuel treatment. Water Res 149:533–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao B, Zhang T, Zhang W, Wang D (2021) Enhanced technology based for sewage sludge deep dewatering: a critical review. Water Res 189:116650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen C, Xiong Q, Jiang S, Dong Y, Hou H (2019) Effect of rice husk flour size on sewage sludge dewaterability during composite conditioning with persulfate. Desalin Water Treat 168:340–347. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2019.24649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen C, Zhang T, Lv L, Chen Y, Tang W, Tang S (2021) Destroying the structure of extracellular polymeric substance to improve the dewatering performance of waste activated sludge by ionic liquid. Water Res 199:117161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deneux-Mustin S, Lartiges BS, Villemin G, Thomas F, Yvon J, Bersillon JL, Snidaro D (2001) Ferric chloride and lime conditioning of activated sludges: an electron microscopic study on resin-embedded samples. Water Res 35(12):3018–3024. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00003-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Diaz-Elsayed N, Rezaei N, Guo T, Mohebbi S, Zhang Q (2019) Wastewater-based resource recovery technologies across scale: a review. Resour Conserv Recycl 145:94–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Farhat S, Kamel F, Jedoui Y, Kallel M (2012) The relation between the RO fouling membrane and the feed water quality and the pretreatment in Djerba Island plant. Desalination 286:412–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.11.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ge D, Zhang W, Bian C, Yuan H, Zhu N (2019) Insight into a new two-step approach of ozonation and chitosan conditioning for sludge deep-dewatering. Sci Total Environ 697:134032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gerba CP, Pepper IL (2009) Wastewater treatment and biosolids reuse. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 503–530

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guo J, Jia X, Gao Q (2020) Insight into the improvement of dewatering performance of waste activated sludge and the corresponding mechanism by biochar-activated persulfate oxidation. Sci Total Environ 744:140912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo J, Jiang S, Pang Y (2019) Rice straw biochar modified by aluminum chloride enhances the dewatering of the sludge from municipal sewage treatment plant. Sci Total Environ 654:338–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guo Z, Ma L, Dai Q, Ao R, Liu H, Wei Y, Mu L (2020) Role of extracellular polymeric substances in sludge dewatering under modified corn-core powder and sludge-based biochar pretreatments. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 202:110882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo Z, Ma L, Dai Q, Ao R, Liu H, Yang J (2020) Combined application of modified corn-core powder and sludge-based biochar for sewage sludge pretreatment: dewatering performance and dissipative particle dynamics simulation. Environ Pollut 265(Pt A):115095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guo Z, Ma L, Dai Q, Yang J, Ao R, Wang L (2019) Dewatering performance of sewage sludge under pretreatment with modified corn-core powder. Sci Total Environ 684:402–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hu P, Zhuang S, Shen S, Yang Y, Yang H (2021) Dewaterability of sewage sludge conditioned with a graft cationic starch-based flocculant: role of structural characteristics of flocculant. Water Res 189:116578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ippolito JA, Barbarick KA, Elliott HA (2011) Drinking water treatment residuals: a review of recent uses. J Environ Qual 40(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2010.0242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kang C, Zhao Y, Tang C, Addo-Bankas O (2022) Use of aluminum-based water treatment sludge as coagulant for animal farm wastewater treatment. J Water Process Eng 46:102645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Karr PR, Keinath TM (1978) Influence of particle size on sludge dewaterability. J Water Pollut Control Federation 50(8):1911–1930

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lai JY, Liu JC (2004) Co-conditioning and dewatering of alum sludge and waste activated sludge. Water Sci Technol 50(9):41–48. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2004.0530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee J-E (2011) The effect of the addition of fly ash to municipal digested sludge on its electroosmotic dewatering. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 13(3):259–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-011-0023-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li J, Liu L, Liu J, Ma T, Yan A, Ni Y (2016) Effect of adding alum sludge from water treatment plant on sewage sludge dewatering. J Environ Chem Eng 4(1):746–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.07.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liang J, Zhang S, Ye M, Huang J, Yang X, Li S, Sun S (2020) Improving sewage sludge dewaterability with rapid and cost-effective in-situ generation of Fe2+ combined with oxidants. Chem Eng J 380:122499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin F, Zhu X, Li J, Yu P, Luo Y, Liu M (2019) Effect of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) conditioned by combined lysozyme and cationic polyacrylamide on the dewatering performance of activated sludge. Chemosphere 235:679–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ma W, Zhao L, Liu H, Liu Q, Ma J (2017) Improvement of sludge dewaterability with modified cinder via affecting EPS. Front Environ Sci Eng 11(6):19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0967-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mangunda C, Petersen J, Lewis AE (2019) The effect of Fe(III) concentration on the dewatering behaviour of Fe(III) oxyhydroxide precipitates from low-tenor solutions. Hydrometallurgy 183:20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Marguti AL, Ferreira Filho SS, Piveli RP (2018) Full-scale effects of addition of sludge from water treatment stations into processes of sewage treatment by conventional activated sludge. J Environ Manage 215:283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Masihi H, Badalians Gholikandi G (2018) Employing Electrochemical-Fenton process for conditioning and dewatering of anaerobically digested sludge: a novel approach. Water Res 144:373–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Masihi H, Badalians Gholikandi G (2020) Using acidic-modified bentonite for anaerobically digested sludge conditioning and dewatering. Chemosphere 241:125096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Meyer T, Amin P, Allen DG, Tran H (2018) Dewatering of pulp and paper mill biosludge and primary sludge. J Environ Chem Eng 6(5):6317–6321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.09.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Qi Y, Thapa KB, Hoadley AFA (2011) Application of filtration aids for improving sludge dewatering properties—a review. Chem Eng J 171(2):373–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Remmen K, Niewersch C, Wintgens T, Yüce S, Wessling M (2017) Effect of high salt concentration on phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge and dewatering properties. J Water Process Eng 19:277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ren B, Lyczko N, Zhao Y, Nzihou A (2020) Integrating alum sludge with waste-activated sludge in co-conditioning and dewatering: a case study of a city in south France. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27(13):14863–14871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08056-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Saqib ANS, Waseem A, Khan AF, Mahmood Q, Khan A, Habib A, Khan AR (2013) Arsenic bioremediation by low cost materials derived from Blue Pine (Pinus wallichiana) and Walnut (Juglans regia). Ecol Eng 51:88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sun J, Pikaar I, Sharma KR, Keller J, Yuan Z (2015) Feasibility of sulfide control in sewers by reuse of iron rich drinking water treatment sludge. Water Res 71:150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.12.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Thapa KB, Qi Y, Hoadley AFA (2009) Interaction of polyelectrolyte with digested sewage sludge and lignite in sludge dewatering. Colloids Surf A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tochioka E, Yamashita M, Usui J, Miyake H, Terada A, Hosomi M (2019) Enhancing the dewaterability of anaerobically digested sludge using fibrous materials recovered from primary sludge: demonstration from a field study. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21(5):1131–1141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01698-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang H-F, Hu H, Wang H-J, Zeng RJ (2019) Combined use of inorganic coagulants and cationic polyacrylamide for enhancing dewaterability of sewage sludge. J Clean Prod 211:387–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang S, Yang YK, Chen XG, Lv JZ, Li J (2017) Effects of bamboo powder and rice husk powder conditioners on sludge dewatering and filtrate quality. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 124:288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wei H, Gao B, Ren J, Li A, Yang H (2018) Coagulation/flocculation in dewatering of sludge: a review. Water Res 143(2015):608–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wei H, Ren J, Li A, Yang H (2018) Sludge dewaterability of a starch-based flocculant and its combined usage with ferric chloride. Chem Eng J 349:737–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wójcik M (2020) Investigation of filtration properties and microbiological characteristics of sewage sludge after physical conditioning with the use of ground walnut shells. Powder Technol 361:491–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.11.100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wójcik M, Stachowicz F (2019) Influence of physical, chemical and dual sewage sludge conditioning methods on the dewatering efficiency. Powder Technol 344:96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wu B, Dai X, Chai X (2020) Critical review on dewatering of sewage sludge: influential mechanism, conditioning technologies and implications to sludge re-utilizations. Water Res 180:115912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wu J, Lu T, Yang G, Meng W, Yuan H, Chen Y (2020) Self-recycling of sewage sludge as a coagulant and mechanism in sewage sludge dewatering. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 22(6):1867–1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01083-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wu W, Zhou Z, Yang J, Chen G, Yao J, Tu C, Wu Z (2019) Insights into conditioning of landfill sludge by FeCl3 and lime. Water Res 160:167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yan A, Li J, Liu L, Ma T, Liu J, Ni Y (2018) Centrifugal dewatering of blended sludge from drinking water treatment plant and wastewater treatment plant. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 20(1):421–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0597-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yang P, Li D, Zhang W, Wang N, Yang Z, Wang D, Ma T (2019) Flocculation-dewatering behavior of waste activated sludge particles under chemical conditioning with inorganic polymer flocculant: effects of typical sludge properties. Chemosphere 218:930–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang J, Xia C, Yue Q, Gao B, Yang K, Wu S, Kan Y (2017) Application of FeCl3 to adjust urban sewage-dewatered sludge (UDSS) containing cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM) for further dewatering. Water Air Soil Pollut 228(6):196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3377-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang X, Kang H, Zhang Q, Hao X, Han X, Zhang W, Jiao T (2019) The porous structure effects of skeleton builders in sustainable sludge dewatering process. J Environ Manage 230:14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhou X, Jiang G, Zhang T, Wang Q, Xie GJ, Yuan Z (2015) Role of extracellular polymeric substances in improvement of sludge dewaterability through peroxidation. Bioresour Technol 192:817–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.05.087

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gagik Badalians Gholikandi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kazemi, M., Badalians Gholikandi, G. Digested wastewater sludge dewatering process using water treatment plants chemical sludge and walnut shell activated carbon powder. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 25, 1096–1107 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01596-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01596-w

Keywords

Navigation