Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Solid-state anaerobic co-digestion of food waste, rice straw, and rice husk supplemented with cattle digesta under thermophilic conditions

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improving the solid-state digestion of food waste (FW) is important for recovering energy and utilizing the digested residue as fertilizer. Herein, solid-state anaerobic co-digestion was conducted using thermophilic digesters. The inhibitory effects of ammonium were controlled using seasonal rice straw (RS) and perennial rice husk (RH). Furthermore, to accelerate lignocellulosic biomass digestion, cattle rumen digesta was supplemented as an alternative microbial source. When only restaurant FW (average C/N ratio = 13) was used as feed, ammonium accumulation decreased methane production. Methane was successfully produced when RS and RH were mixed with FW, wherein the total solid (TS) ratio of RS and RH to FW was 2.0 (TS = 30–40%; volatile solids (VS) loading rate = 5.08 kg m˗3.day). The FW and RS methane yields were 0.573 m3 kg˗1 VS and 0.259 m3 kg˗1 VS, respectively, similar to the biomethane potential (BMP) of each biomass, whereas the methane yield of RH (0.115 m3 kg˗1 VS) was higher than the BMP. Microbial community analysis revealed that hydrogenotrophic methanogens Methanoculleus and Methanothermobacter were dominant in the digested sludge and cattle digest could be used as a supplement of rumen microorganisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ministry of agriculture forestry and fisheries (2019) Statistics of agriculture, forestry and fisheries (in Japanese). https://www.maff.go.jp/j/shokusan/recycle/syokuhin/attach/pdf/kouhyou-13.pdf

  2. Rajagopal R, Massé DI, Singh G (2013) A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia. Bioresour Technol 143:632–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yirong C, Zhang W, Heaven S, Banks CJ (2017) Influence of ammonia in the anaerobic digestion of food waste. J Environ Chem Eng 5:5131–5142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.09.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li L, Kong Z, Qin Y, Wu J, Zhu A, Xiao B, Ni J, Kubota K, Li YY (2020) Temperature-phased anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and paper waste with and without recirculation: biogas production and microbial structure. Sci Total Environ 724:138168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakakubo R, Kojima Y, Iwabudhi K, Monma T, Matsuda J, Ohmiya K (2013) Dry methane fermentation of municipal waste with various composition (part 1): characteristics of mesophilic fermentation. J Jpn Soc Agric Mach 75:45–51. https://doi.org/10.11357/jsam.75.45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Asato CM, Gonzalez-Estrella J, Jerke AC, Bang SS, Stone JJ, Gilcrease PC (2016) Batch anaerobic digestion of synthetic military base food waste and cardboard mixtures. Bioresour Technol 216:894–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Drennan MF, DiStefano TD (2014) High solids co-digestion of food and landscape waste and the potential for ammonia toxicity. Waste Manag 34:1289–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shimidzu H, Matsuura N, Kanhchany S, Togari T, Misaki T, Yamamoto-Ikemoto HR, R, (2019) Effect of rice straw addition on high solid thermophilic digestion of sewage sludge from an oxidation ditch plant (in Japanese). J Japan Soc Civ Eng 75:451–459. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejer.75.7_III_451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haider MR, Zeshan YS, Yousaf S, Malik RN, Visvanathan C (2015) Effect of mixing ratio of food waste and rice husk co-digestion and substrate to inoculum ratio on biogas production. Bioresour Technol 190:451–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Zuhairi F, Micoli L, Florio C et al (2019) Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal solid wastes with giant reed under mesophilic conditions. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 21:1332–1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-019-00886-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Franqueto R, da Silva JD, Starick EK et al (2020) Anaerobic codigestion of bovine manure and banana tree leaf: the effect of temperature variability on biogas yield in different proportions of waste. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 22:1444–1458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01033-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Borth PLB, Perin JKH, Torrecilhas AR et al (2021) Biochemical methane potential of food and garden waste co-digestion with variation in solid content and inoculum:substrate ratio. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 23:1974–1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01270-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Owamah HI (2020) Biogas yield assessment from the anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and Cymbopogon citratus. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 22:2012–2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01086-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu F, Li Y (2012) Solid-state co-digestion of expired dog food and corn stover for methane production. Bioresour Technol 118:219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kainthola J, Kalamdhad AS, Goud VV (2019) A review on enhanced biogas production from anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass by different enhancement techniques. Process Biochem 84:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.05.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Watanabe A, Katoh K, Kimura M (1993) Effect of rice straw application on CH4 emission from paddy fields. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 39:707–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.1993.10419188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakakihara E, Ikemoto-Yamamoto R, Honda R, Ohtsuki S, Takano M, Suetsugu Y, Watanabe H (2014) Effect of the addition of rice straw on microbial community in a sewage sludge digester. Water Sci Technol 70:819–827. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2014.261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gu T, Yamamoto-Ikemoto R, Tsuchiya-Nakakihara E, Watanabe H, Suetsugu Y, Yanai A (2016) Improvement of dewatering characteristics by co-digestion of rice straw with sewage sludge. Environ Technol 37:3024–3029. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1173118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ye J, Li D, Sun Y, Wang G, Yuan Z, Zhen F, Wang Y (2013) Improved biogas production from rice straw by co-digestion with kitchen waste and pig manure. Waste Manag 33:2653–2658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yong Z, Dong Y, Zhang X, Tan T (2015) Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and straw for biogas production. Renew Energy 78:527–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sayara T, Sánchez A (2019) A review on anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic wastes: pretreatments and operational conditions. Appl Sci 9:4655. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9214655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferraro A, Massini G, Mazzurco MV, Rosa S, Signorini A, Fabbricino M (2020) A novel enrichment approach for anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: process performance enhancement through an inoculum habitat selection. Bioresour Technol 313:123703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ministry of the environment (2016) Manual of methane production facility development (in Japanese). http://www.env.go.jp/recycle/waste/biomass_roadmap

  24. APHA (1992) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  25. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N, Owens SM, Betley J, Fraser L, Bauer M, Gormley N, Gilbert JA, Smith G, Knight R (2012) Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J 6:1621–1624. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Apprill A, McNally S, Parsons R, Weber L (2015) Minor revision to V4 region SSU rrna 806r gene primer greatly increases detection of sar11 bacterioplankton. Aquat Microb Ecol 75:129–137. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gantner S, Andersson AF, Alonso-Sáez L, Bertilsson S (2011) Novel primers for 16S rRNA-based archaeal community analyses in environmental samples. J Microbiol METhods 84:12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Edgar RC (2013) Uparse: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 10:996–998. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yamamoto-Ikemoto R, Shimidzu H, Togari IH, Misaki T, Matsuura N, Honda R (2020) Thermophilic high solid co-digestion of excess sludge and rice straw in a oxidation ditch plant -a pilot scale plant experiment (in Japanese). J Japan Soc Civ Eng 76:471–479

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ike M, Zhao R, Yun M, Shiroma R, Ito S, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Arakane M, Al-Haq MI, Matsuki J, Park JY, Gau M, Yakushido K, Nagashima M, Tokuyasu K (2013) High solid-loading pretreatment/saccharification tests with CaCCO (calcium capturing by carbonation) process for rice straw and domestic energy crop Erianthus arundinaceus. J Appl Glycosci 60:177–185. https://doi.org/10.5458/jag.jag.JAG-2013_002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kawabata J, Ueda Y, Shimokawa K, Suzuki Y, Honma T, Takeda S, Sayama S. (1993) Research on energy saving manufacture of fine ceramics -production of fine ceramics powder from rice husk char (in Japanese). Reports of the government industrial development laboratory, Hokkaido, 53. https://unit.aist.go.jp/hokkaido/hokoku/SHOHOU/DAI059GOU/DAI059.PDF

  33. Zhang C, Su H, Baeyens J, Tan T (2014) Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 38:383–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Misaki T, Yamamoto-Ikemoto R (2020) Evaluation of methane conversion rate of solid biomass via CODCr analysis for introducing anaerobic digestion (in Japanese). J Japan Soc Civ Eng 76:461–470

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gu T, Shen B, Huang C, Honda R, Yamamoto-Ikemoto R (2019) Effects of biomass addition on organic composition of supernatant in sludge digestion process. J Water Environ Technol 17:1–8. https://doi.org/10.2965/JWET.18-029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Muscolo A, Pizzeghello D, Francioso O, Cortes SS, Nardi S (2020) Effectiveness of humic substances and phenolic compounds in regulating plant-biological functionality. Agronomy 10:1553. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy1010155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Li Y, Sasaki H, Okuma Y, Seki K, Kamigochi Y (1998) Effect of the influent TS concentration on high solid thermophilic methane fermentation of organic fraction of municipal solid (in Japanese). Environ Eng Res 35:29–39

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries (2016) Lipid and trans fatty acid concentrations in food. https://www.maff.go.jp/j/syouan/seisaku/trans_fat/t_kihon/content/h28_transfat.html

  39. Gu T, Togari T, Tsuchiya-Nakakihara E, Yamamoto-Ikemoto R (2016) Methane recovery and microbial community analysis of a high solid thermophilic co-digestion of sewage sludge and waste fried tofu. J Water Environ Technol 14:319–328. https://doi.org/10.2965/jwet.15-091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Weimer PJ, Zeikus JG (1977) Fermentation of cellulose and cellobiose by clostridium thermocellum in the absence of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:289–297. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.33.2.289-297.1977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Patra A, Park T, Kim M, Yu Z (2017) Rumen methanogens and mitigation of methane emission by anti-methanogenic compounds and substances. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 8:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0145-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries (2013) Guide for preparation of biomass utilization promotion plans by prefectures and municipalities (in Japanese). https://www.maff.go.jp/j/shokusan/biomass/b_kihonho/local/pdf/tebiki.pdf

  43. Togari T, Misaki T, Matsuura N, Matsuura N, Tanabe A, Hamaguchi T, Koike K, Yamamoto-Ikemoto R (2020) Energy recovery and utilizability of residue for rice field by thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and rice straw (in Japanese). J Japan Soc Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejer.76.7_III_481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kazuyuki Y, Katsuyuki M (1990) Effect of organic matter application on methane emission from some Japanese paddy fields. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 36(4):599–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.1990.10416797

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Low Carbon Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryoko Yamamoto-Ikemoto.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 326 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shimizu, H., Matsuura, N., Gu, T. et al. Solid-state anaerobic co-digestion of food waste, rice straw, and rice husk supplemented with cattle digesta under thermophilic conditions. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 24, 2341–2352 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01484-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01484-9

Keywords

Navigation