Skip to main content
Log in

Process modeling and economic assessment of converting municipal solid waste into solid fuel via hydrothermal processing: a case study in Vietnam

  • REGIONAL CASE STUDY
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As with any developing country, Vietnam has faced numerous challenges in the management and treatment of municipal solid waste (MSW). Vietnam consumed of 65.5 million tons coal in 2020, whilst a large amount of MSW was not able to use for energy production. Therefore, a searching for alternative fuels that could replace fossil fuel and reduce gases emission is an urgent need. In this study, the conversion of MSW into solid fuel was performed using hydrothermal treatment. Our results revealed that MSW treating by hydrothermal method at 220 °C produced solid fuel with calorific value of 4491 kcal/kg. As compared to coals using for thermal power plants, the quality of solid fuel was better. This implies the potential uses of solid fuel, which could be combusted independently or co-combusted with coals at the power sector. The simulation of MSW treatment by hydrothermal process with 240 MT/d was evaluated, two scenarios of treatment plant for solid fuel (HRtS) and electricity production (HRtE) were modeled and analyzed in terms of techno-economic feasibility. HRtS plant would generate 26,667 MT/y of solid fuel and total sale revenue of 2.47 million USD/y. Meanwhile, the HRtE plant would generate 19,880 MWh/y with 3.4 million USD/y.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4 
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. VanDenBerg K, Duong TC (2018) Solid and industrial hazardous waste management assessment: options and actions areas (English). Washington DC, World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/352371563196189492/Solid-and-industrial-hazardous-waste-management-assessment-options-and-actions-areas. Accessed 9 Mar 2021

  2. Sharma HB, Sarmah AK, Dubey B (2020) Hydrothermal carbonization of renewable waste biomass for solid biofuel production: a discussion on process mechanism, the influence of process parameters, environmental performance and fuel properties of hydrochar. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 123:109761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ismail TM, Yoshikawa K, Sherif H, Abd El-Salam M (2019) Hydrothermal treatment of municipal solid waste into coal in a commercial Plant: numerical assessment of process parameters. Appl Energy 250:653–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maqhuzu AB, Yoshikawa K, Takahashi F (2020) Stochastic economic analysis of coal-alternative fuel production from municipal solid wastes employing hydrothermal carbonization in Zimbabwe. Sci Total Environ 716:135337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mazumder S, Saha P, Reza MT (2020) Co-hydrothermal carbonization of coal waste and food waste: fuel characteristics. Biomass Convers Biorefin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00771-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Basso D, Patuzzi F, Castello D, Baratieri M, Rada EC, Weiss-Hortala E, Fiori L (2016) Agro-industrial waste to solid biofuel through hydrothermal carbonization. Waste Manag 47:114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Phasee P, Areeprasert C (2018) An investigation on mechanical property of MSW-derived fuel pellet produced from hydrothermal treatment. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20:2028–2040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0752-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saqib NU, Oh M, Jo W, Park S-K, Lee J-Y (2017) Conversion of dry leaves into hydrochar through hydrothermal carbonization (HTC). J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19:111–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-015-0371-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Basso D, Weiss-Hortala E, Patuzzi F, Castello D, Baratieri M, Fiori L (2015) Hydrothermal carbonization of off-specification compost: a byproduct of the organic municipal solid waste treatment. Bioresour Technol 182:217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hrnčič MK, Kravanja G, Knez Ž (2016) Hydrothermal treatment of biomass for energy and chemicals. Energy 116:1312–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.06.148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mazumder S, Saha P, McGaughy K, Saba A, Reza MT (2020) Technoeconomic analysis of co-hydrothermal carbonization of coal waste and food waste. Biomass Convers Biorefin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00817-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Do TX, Lim Y-i (2016) Techno-economic comparison of three energy conversion pathways from empty fruit bunches. Renew Energ 90:307–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Do TX, Lim Y-i, Cho H, Shim J, Yoo J, Rho K, Choi S-G, Park C, Park B-Y (2018) Techno-economic analysis of fry-drying and torrefaction plant for bio-solid fuel production. Renew Energ 119:45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Do TX, Lim Y-i, Jang S, Chung H-J (2015) Hierarchical economic potential approach for techno-economic evaluation of bioethanol production from palm empty fruit bunches. Bioresour Technol 189:224–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Do TX, Lim Y-I, Yeo H (2014) Techno-economic analysis of bio-oil production process from palm empty fruit bunches. Energy Convers Manag 80:525–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.01.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Do TX, Lim Y-I, Yeo H, Lee U-D, Choi Y-T, Song J-H (2014) Techno-economic analysis of power plant via circulating fluidized-bed gasification from woodchips. Energy 70:547–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Do TX, Mujahid R, Lim HS, Kim J-K, Lim Y-I, Kim J (2020) Techno-economic analysis of bio heavy-oil production from sewage sludge using supercritical and subcritical water. Renew Energ 151:30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xuan Do T, Prajitno H, Lim Y-I, Kim J (2019) Process modeling and economic analysis for bio-heavy-oil production from sewage sludge using supercritical ethanol and methanol. J Supercrit Fluid 150:137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2019.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Do TX, Lim Y-i, Cho H, Shim J, Yoo J, Rho K, Choi S-G, Park B-Y (2017) Process modeling and energy consumption of fry-drying and torrefaction of organic solid waste. Drying Technol 35:754–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2016.1211674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kawai K, Huong LTM, Yamada M, Osako M (2016) Proximate composition of household waste and applicability of waste management technologies by source separation in Hanoi, Viet Nam. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18:517–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-014-0348-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Youcai Z (2017) Chapter one - municipal solid waste incineration process and generation of bottom ash and fly ash. In: Youcai Z (ed) Pollution control and resource recovery: municipal solid wastes incineration. Butterworth-Heinemann, pp 1–59

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mutz D, Hengevoss D, Hugi C, Hinchliffe D (2017) Waste-to-Energy Options in Municipal Solid Waste Management—A Guide for Decision Makers in Developing and Emerging Countries, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Eschborn, Germany

  23. Le KH, Tran TTH, Tsotsas E, Kharaghani A (2021) Superheated steam drying of single wood particles: modeling and comparative study with hot air drying. Chem Eng Technol 44:114–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202000133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tri Sesilia Safril BIS, Yoshikawa K (2017) Commercial demonstration of solid fuel production from municipal solid waste employing the hydrothermal treatment. Int J Environ Sci 2:316–323

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peters MS, Timmerhaus KD, West RE (2003) Plant design and economics for chemical engineers, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Turton R, Bailie RC, Whiting WB, Shaeiwitz JA, Bhattacharyya D (2012) Analysis, synthesis and design of chemical processes, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Christensen P, Dysert LR (2011) Cost estimate classification system; AACE (American Association of Cost Engineering) International, Practice No. 17R-97

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support from (Project. B2020-BKA-09) Ministry of Education and Training of Vietnam for conducting this research is highly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tho Van Dinh Son.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflict of Interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Do, T.X., Phan, T.T.N. & Van Dinh Son, T. Process modeling and economic assessment of converting municipal solid waste into solid fuel via hydrothermal processing: a case study in Vietnam. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 23, 2318–2335 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01286-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01286-5

Keywords

Navigation