Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anaerobic co-digestion: a sustainable approach to food processing organic waste management

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion is a promising technology to control pollution and recover energy from organic matter. In this study, batch experiments were conducted to investigate methane yields of seven organic wastes from a food processing company and dairy manure (DM) from a tie-stall barn having two straw lengths (2 cm and 10 cm) at 52 °C. This was followed by anaerobic co-digestion of all organic wastes with DM in bench experiments. The results indicated that the highest methane yield was observed in lipid-rich waste (basil sauce, 0.47 L/gVS) followed by carbohydrate-rich wastes (pumpkin processing residue, 0.21 L/gVS); the lowest yield was obtained from tomato leaves and stems (0.09 L/gVS). Furthermore, the methane yield from DM was about 0.18 L/gVS, irrespective of the straw length. Anaerobic co-digestion of food processing residues with DM demonstrated a 41% increase in methane yield (0.24 L/gVS), as compared to DM alone (0.17 L/gVS), while the milling of both organic wastes and DM did not affect methane yields. Thus, integration of anaerobic co-digestion in food processing residue management is a sustainable approach that guarantees a closed-loop flowing economy and makes food processing environmentally friendly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yabe N (2013) Environmental and economic evaluations of centralized biogas plants running on cow manure in Hokkaido, Japan. Biomass Bioenerg 49:143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andriamanohiarisoamanana FJ, Saikawa A, Kan T et al (2018) Semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure, meat and bone meal and crude glycerol: Process performance and digestate valorization. Renew Energy 128:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. JFS (2006) Food waste recycling in Japan. In: Japan Sustain

  4. Wu G, Healy MG, Zhan X (2009) Effect of the solid content on anaerobic digestion of meat and bone meal. Bioresour Technol 100:4326–4331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Viana MB, Freitas AV, Leitão RC et al (2012) Anaerobic digestion of crude glycerol: a review. Environ Technol Rev 1:81–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2012.692723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Takeuchi Y, Andriamanohiarisoamanana FJ, Yasui S et al (2017) Feasibility study of a centralized biogas plant performance in a dairy farming area. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0582-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang L, Lee YW, Jahng D (2011) Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and piggery wastewater: Focusing on the role of trace elements. Bioresour Technol 102:5048–5059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Angelidaki I, Ellegaard L (2003) Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants: status and future trends. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 109:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:109:1-3:95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Farghali M, Andriamanohiarisoamanana FJ, Ahmed MM et al (2020) Prospects for biogas production and H2S control from the anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: The influence of microscale waste iron powder and iron oxide nanoparticles. Waste Manag 101:141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamashiro T, Lateef SA, Ying C et al (2013) Anaerobic co-digestion of dairy cow manure and high concentrated food processing waste. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 15:539–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-012-0110-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. APHA (2005) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater (21st ed.). American Public Health Association/American Water Works/ Water Environment Federation

  12. Kimura Y, Umetsu K, Takahata H (1994) The effect of temperature on continuously expanding AD (III) - Characteristics of anaerobic digested dairy slurry for CED -. J Japanese Grassl Sci 40:165–170

    Google Scholar 

  13. Andriamanohiarisoamanana F, Yamashiro T, Ihara I et al (2016) Farm-scale thermophilic co-digestion of dairy manure with a biodiesel byproduct in cold regions. Energy Convers Manag 128:273–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.09.084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li Y, Zhang R, Liu G et al (2013) Comparison of methane production potential, biodegradability, and kinetics of different organic substrates. Bioresour Technol 149:565–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Andriamanohiarisoamanana FJ, Matsunami N, Yamashiro T et al (2017) High-solids anaerobic mono-digestion of riverbank grass under thermophilic conditions. J Environ Sci 52:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2016.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bayr S, Rintala J (2012) Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper mill primary sludge and co-digestion of primary and secondary sludge. Water Res 46:4713–4720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.06.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Feijoo G, Soto M, Lema JM (1995) Sodium inhibition in the anaerobic digestion process : Antagonism and adaptation phenomena. Enzyme Microb Technol 17:180–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Umetsu K, Ying C, Kikuchi S et al (2011) Integration of centralized biogas plant in cold-snowy region in Japan. Biotechnol Anim Husb 27:405–414. https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1103405U

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Andriamanohiarisoamanana FJ, Saikawa A, Tarukawa K et al (2017) Anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure, meat and bone meal, and crude glycerol under mesophilic conditions: Synergistic effect and kinetic studies. Energy Sustain Dev 40:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2017.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim MY, Kim EJ, Kim YN et al (2012) Comparison of the chemical compositions and nutritive values of various pumpkin (Cucurbitaceae) species and parts. Nutr Res Pract 6:21–27. https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2012.6.1.21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang R, Zhang Z (1999) Biogasification of rice straw with an anaerobic-phased solids digester system. Bioresour Technol 68:235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00154-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Geissdoerfer M, Savaget P, Bocken NMP, Hultink EJ (2017) The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? J Clean Prod 143:757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. METI (2003) Handbook on Resource Recycling Legislation and 3R Trends in 2003. Minist Econ Trade Ind Japan 84

  24. Korhonen J, Honkasalo A, Seppälä J (2018) Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations. Ecol Econ 143:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li X, Deng B, Ye H (2011) The research based on the 3-R principle of agro-circular economy model-the Erhai lake basin as an example. Energy Procedia 5:1399–1404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liguori R, Faraco V (2016) Biological processes for advancing lignocellulosic waste biorefinery by advocating circular economy. Bioresour Technol 215:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Siegmeier T, Blumenstein B, Möller D (2015) Farm biogas production in organic agriculture: System implications. Agric Syst 139:196–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ikko Ihara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andriamanohiarisoamanana, F.J., Yasui, S., Yamashiro, T. et al. Anaerobic co-digestion: a sustainable approach to food processing organic waste management. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 22, 1501–1508 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01040-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01040-3

Keywords

Navigation