Abstract
Methane emission characteristics of a full-scale windrow pile for municipal solid waste (MSW) treatment in Thailand were investigated. Surface emission rate, in-pile methane gas content and waste characteristics were observed over 14 months period. The results revealed average surface methane emission rate of 5.32 g/t dry wt./day, being largely fluctuated between 0.05 and 27.13 g/t dry wt./day. The methane emission from MBT windrow pile, during which 75% of organic wastes were decomposed, were comparatively lower than those reported for landfills and windrow composting operations. The precipitation affected gas emission especially during the initial phase of waste decomposition with gas production lag time ranged between 0.34 and 0.55 years. Positive correlation between methane emission rate from waste pile and precipitation was observed during methanogenic stage or gas rising stage when organic content in wastes was still high. The open windrows operated in tropic climate could facilitate a high degree of waste stabilization but they were not effective for the reduction of moisture from MSW required for utilization as refuse-derived fuel.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
DEFRA (2013) Mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste, Department for Environment. Food & Rural Affairs, Government of the United Kingdom
Kumar A, Samadder SR (2017) A review on technological options of waste to energy for effective management of municipal solid waste. Waste Manage 69:407–422
Nithikul J, Karthikeyan OP, Visvanathan C (2011) Reject management from a Mechanical Biological Treatment plant in Bangkok, Thailand. Resour Conserv Recycl 55:417–422
European Commission-Directorate General Environment (2013) Refuse derived fuel, current practice and perspectives, Final Report, WRc Ref. CO5087-4
Montejo C, Tonini D, Márquez M, Astrup TF (2013) Mechanical-biological treatment: Performance and potentials, an LCA of 8 MBT plants including waste characterization. J Environ Manage 128:661–673
Liwarska-Bizukojc E, Ledakowicz S (2003) Stoichiometry of the aerobic biodegradation of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (MSW). Biodegradation 14:51–56
Evangelou A, Gerassimidou S, Mavrakis N, Komili D (2016) Monitoring the performances of a real scale municipal solid waste composting and a biodrying facility using respiration activity indices. Environ Monit Assess 188:302
Shao LM, Ma ZH, Zhang H, Zhang DQ, He PJ (2010) Bio-drying and size sorting of municipal solid waste with high water content for improving energy recovery. Waste Manage 30:1165–1170
Shao LM, He X, Yang N, Fang JJ, Lu F, He PJ (2012) Biodryinging of municipal solid waste under different ventilation modes: drying efficiency and aqueous pollution. Waste Manage Res 30(12):1272–1280
Zhang DW, He PJ, Yu LZ, Shao LM (2009) Effect of inoculation time on the bio-drying performance of combined hydrolytic-aerobic process. Bioresour Technol 100:1087–1093
Punin W, Maneewan S, Punlek C (2014) The feasibility of converting solid waste into refuse-derived fuel 5 via mechanical biological treatment process. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 16:753–762
Loo YY, Billa L, Singh A (2015) Effect of climate change on seasonal monsoon in Asia and its impact on the variability of monsoon rainfall in Southeast Asia. Geosci Front 6:817–823
Zhang H, He P, Shao L (2009) N2O emissions at municipal solid waste landfill sites: effects of CH4 emissions and cover soil. Atmos Environ 43:2623–2631
Clemens J, Cuhls C (2003) Greenhouse gas emissions from mechanical and biological waste treatment of municipal waste. Environ Technol 24:745–754
Pantini S, Verginelli I, Lombardi F, Scheutz C, Kjeldsen P (2015) Assessment of biogas production from MBT waste under different operating conditions. Waste Manage 43:37–49
Siddiqui AA, Richards DJ, Powrie W (2013) Biodegradation and flushing of MBT wastes. Waste Manage 33:2257–2266
Pan J, Voulvoulis N (2007) The role of mechanical and biological treatment in reducing methane emissions from landfill disposal of municipal solid waste in the United Kingdom. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 57:155–163
Heyer KU, Hupe K, Stegmann R (2013) Methane emissions from MBT landfills. Waste Manage 33:1853–1860
Lornage R, Redon E, Lagier T, Hébé I, Carré J (2007) Performance of a low cost MBT prior to landfilling: Study of the biological treatment of size reduced MSW without mechanical sorting. Waste Manage 27(12):1755–1764
Sormunen K, Einola J, Ettala M, Rintala J (2008) Leachate and gaseous emissions from initial phases of landfilling mechanically and mechanically biologically treated municipal solid waste residuals. Bioresour Technol 99(7):2399–2409
Scaglia B, Salati S, De Gregorio A, Carrera A, Tambone F (2013) Short mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste allows landfill impact reduction saving waste energy content. Bioresour Technol 143:131–138
Ali M, Zhang J, Raga R, Lavagnolo MC, Pivato A, Wang X, Zhang Y (2018) Effectiveness of aerobic pretreatment of municipal solid waste for accelerating biogas generation during simulated landfilling. Front Environ Sci Eng 12:5
Harborth P, Fuß R, Münnich K, Flessa H, Fricke K (2013) Spatial variability of nitrous oxide and methane emissions from an MBT landfill in operation: strong N2O hotspots at working face. Waste Manage 33:2099–2107
Tungtakanpoung D (2006) Characteristics of Solid Waste after Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT): A case study of Phitsanulok. Thailand J Res Eng Technol 3(3):241–251
GTZ (2003) Sector project Mechanical-Biological Waste Treatment. Final Report, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit, Germany
Reinhart DR, Cooper DC, Walker B (1992) Flux chamber design and operation for the measurement of municipal solid waste landfill gas. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 42:1067–1070
USEPA (1986) Measurement of Gaseous Emission Rates from Land Surfaces Using an Emission Isolation Flux Chamber. User’s Guide. EPA 600/8-86-008 (NTIS PB-223161). US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.
Sutthasil N, Chiemchaisri C, Chiemchaisri W, Wangyao K, Endo K, Ishigaki T, Yamada M (2019) The effectiveness of passive gas ventilation on methane emission reduction in a semi-aerobic test cell operated in the tropics. Waste Manage 87:954–964
Amlinger F, Peyr S, Cuhls C (2008) Green house gas emissions from composting and mechanical biological treatment. Waste Manage Res 26:47–60
Einola JKM, Karhu AE, Rintala JA (2008) Mechanically-biologically treated municipal solid waste as a support medium for microbial methane oxidation to mitigate landfill greenhouse emissions. Waste Manage 28:97–111
IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva
Baptista M, Antunes F, Goncalves MS, Morvan B, Silveira A (2010) Composting kinetics in full-scale mechanical-biological treatment plants. Waste Manage 30:1908–1921
Machado SL, Carvalho MF, Gourc J, Vilar OM, Nascimento JCF (2009) Methane generation in tropical landfills: simplified methods and field results. Waste Manage 29:153–161
Ishigaki T, Chung CV, Nguyen NS, Ike M, Otsuka K, Yamada M, Inoue Y (2008) Estimation and field measurement of methane emission from waste landfills in Hanoi. Vietnam J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 10:165–172
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Phitsanulok municipality for providing staffs, equipment as well as supporting area monitoring experiment in this research. This research is supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund, Ministry of the Environment, Japan (A-1001) and Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (Research Grant no. 104.53).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sutthasil, N., Chiemchaisri, C., Chiemchaisri, W. et al. Greenhouse gas emission from windrow pile for mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid wastes in tropical climate. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 22, 383–395 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-00999-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-00999-3