Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Simultaneous synergistic effects of addition of agro-based adsorbent on anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of anaerobic co-digestion of food waste (FW) and sewage sludge (SS) at high organic load with the aid of an inorganic adsorbent supplementary. From BMP tests of seven mesophilic reactors, it was found that the stability of the system was hindered at higher organic load due to low alkalinity capacity of sludge (1600 mg/L) and excessive accumulation of inhibitory substances such as free ammonia and VFA. Thus, the low-cost adsorbent was applied to enhance the digestion process stability at high organic load (12.8 g VS/L). The results showed that addition of 1 g of sorghum-based activated carbon (SAC) (4 g TS/L) stabilized the system, reduced ammonia and T-VFA concentration from 267 to 39 mg/L, and 1300 to under 600 mg/L, respectively. Consequently, the methane yield increased from 201 to 272 mL/g VS (35%), solid retention time (SRT) reduced by 34%, and T-COD removal achieved by 79.38%. However, with a further increase of SAC the biogas generation decreased due to excessive adsorption of VFAs.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu C, Huan L, Yuyao Z, Can L (2016) Improve biogas production from low-organic-content sludge through high-solids anaerobic co-digestion with food waste. Bioresour Technol 219:252–260

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang C, Xiao G, Peng L, Su H, Tan TJB (2013) The anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and cattle manure. Bioresour Technol 129:170–176

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mata AJ, Dosta J, Romero GM, Fonoll X, Peces M, Astals S (2014) A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 36:412–427

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang G, Zhang Z, Li CJW (2018) Improvement of solid-state anaerobic digestion of yard waste by co-digestion and pH adjustment. Waste Biomass Valoriz 9(2):211–221

    Google Scholar 

  5. Awe OW, Lu J, Wu S, Zhao Y, Nzihou A, Lyczko N, Minh DPJW (2018) Effect of oil content on biogas production, process performance and stability of food waste anaerobic digestion. Waste Biomass Valoriz 9(12):2295–2306

    Google Scholar 

  6. Park S, Han SK, OH D, Kim D, Kim H, Yoon YM (2018) High-rate anaerobic digestion of thermally hydrolyzed wasted sludge (THWS) with high-strength ammonia. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20(1):516–524

    Google Scholar 

  7. Van NA, Nguyen HT, Van LC, Goel R, Terashima M, Yasui H (2016) A dynamic simulation of methane fermentation process receiving heterogeneous food wastes and modelling acidic failure. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 18(2):239–247

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim JR, Kim JY (2016) Feasibility assessment of thermophilic anaerobic digestion process of food waste. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 18(3):413–418

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peng X, ShangY Z, Lei L, Xiaofei Z, Yao M, Dezhi S (2018) Long-term high-solids anaerobic digestion of food waste: effects of ammonia on process performance and microbial community. Bioresour Technol 262:148–158

    Google Scholar 

  10. Altinbas M, Cicek O (2019) Anaerobic co-digestion of chicken and cattle manures: free ammonia inhibition. Energy Sources 41(9):1097–1109

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shi X, Lin J, Zuo J, Li P, Li X, Guo X (2017) Effects of free ammonia on volatile fatty acid accumulation and process performance in the anaerobic digestion of two typical bio-wastes. J Environ Sci 55:49–57

    Google Scholar 

  12. Massé DI, Masse L, Croteau F (2003) The effect of temperature fluctuations on psychrophilic anaerobic sequencing batch reactors treating swine manure. Bioresour Technol 89(1):57–62

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rodriguez DC, Belmonte M, Penuela G, Campos JL, Vidal G (2011) Behavior of molecular weight distribution for the liquid fraction of pig slurry treated by anaerobic digestion. Environ Technol 32(4):419–425

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sung S, Liu T (2003) Ammonia inhibition on thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Chemosphere 53(1):43–52

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herrmann Christiane, Navajyoti K, David W, Ao X, Jerry DM (2016) Optimised biogas production from microalgae through co-digestion with carbon-rich co-substrates. Bioresour Technol 214:328–337

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tang Jialing, Xiaochang CW, Yisong H, Yunhui P, Jin H, Huu HN, Yonggang Z, Yuyou L (2018) Nitrogen removal enhancement using lactic acid fermentation products from food waste as external carbon sources: performance and microbial communities. Bioresour Technol 256:259–268

    Google Scholar 

  17. Neshat SA, Mohammadi M, Najafpour GD (2017) Photosynthesis assisted anaerobic digestion of cattle manure leachate in a hybrid bioreactor: an integrated system for enhanced wastewater treatment and methane production. Chem Eng J 330:616–624

    Google Scholar 

  18. De Gisi S, Lofrano G, Grassi M, Notarnicola M (1996) Characteristics and adsorption capacities of low-cost sorbents for wastewater treatment: a review. Sustain Mater Technol 9:10–40

    Google Scholar 

  19. Borja R, Sцnchez E, Duran MM (1996) Effect of the clay mineral zeolite on ammonia inhibition of anaerobic thermophilic reactors treating cattle manure. J Environ Sci Health Part A 31:479–500

    Google Scholar 

  20. McCrory DF, Hobbs PJ (2001) Additives to reduce ammonia and odor emissions from livestock wastes. J Environ Qual 30:345–355

    Google Scholar 

  21. Milцn ZE, Sцnchez P, Weiland R, Borja A, Martn K Ilangovan (2001) Influence of different natural zeolite concentrations on the anaerobic digestion of piggery waste. Bioresour Technol 80:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wijesinghe DTN, Dassanayake KB, Sommer SG, Scales P, Chen D (2018) Biogas improvement by adding Australian zeolite during the anaerobic digestion of C:N ratio adjusted swine manure. Waste Biomass Valoriz 10:1883–1887

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jimnez J, Guardia-Puebla Y, Cisneros-Ortiz ME, Morgan-Sagastume JM, Guerra G, Noyola A (2015) Optimization of the specific methanogenic activity during the anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and rice straw, using industrial clay residues as inorganic additive. Chem Eng J 259:703–714

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen XiaoY, Khunjar W, Jun Z, JiangLi L, Xianxian Y, Zhijian Z (2012) Synthesis of nano-zeolite from coal fly ash and its potential for nutrient sequestration from anaerobically digested swine wastewater. Bioresour Technol 110:79–85

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lц F, Chenghao L, Liming S, Pinjing H (2016) Biochar alleviates combined stress of ammonium and acids by firstly enriching methanosaeta and then methanosarcina. Water Res 90:34–43

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yang Y, Zhang Y, Li Z, Zhao Z, Quan X, Zhao Z (2017) Adding granular activated carbon into anaerobic sludge digestion to promote methane production and sludge decomposition. J Clean Prod 149:1101–1108

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cuetos MJ, Martinez EJ, Moreno R, Gonzalez R, Otero M, Gomez X (2017) Enhancing anaerobic digestion of poultry blood using activated carbon. J Adv Res 8(3):297–307

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang L, Jingxin Z, Kai-C L (2018) Activated carbon enhanced anaerobic digestion of food waste—laboratory-scale and Pilot-scale operation. Waste Manag 75:270–279

    Google Scholar 

  29. Esposito G, Frunzo L, Panico A, Pirozzi F (2012) Enhanced bio-methane production from co-digestion of different organic wastes. Environ Technol 33(24):2733–2740

    Google Scholar 

  30. Raposo F, De la Ra M, Fernández-Cegrí V, Borja R (2012) Anaerobic digestion of solid organic substrates in batch mode: an overview relating to methane yields and experimental procedures. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(1):861–877

    Google Scholar 

  31. Water Environment Federation (1999) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, p 6430. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Standard+methods+for+the+examination+of+water+&+wastewater#0

  32. Yu Q, Xia D, Li H, Ke L, Wang H, Zheng Y, Li Q (2016) Effectiveness and mechanisms of ammonium adsorption on biochars derived from biogas residues. RSC Adv 6(91):88373–88381

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sosnowski P, Wieczorek A, Ledakowicz S (2003) Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and organic fraction of municipal solid wastes. Adv Environ Res 7:609–616

    Google Scholar 

  34. Penaud V, Delgenes JP, Moletta R (1999) Thermo-chemical pretreatment of a microbial biomass: influence of sodium hydroxide addition on solubilization and anaerobic biodegradability. Enzyme Microb Technol 25:258–263

    Google Scholar 

  35. Liu C, Wang W, Anwar N, Ma Z, Liu G, Zhang R (2017) Effect of organic loading rate on anaerobic digestion of food waste under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Fuels 31(3):2976–2984

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nagao N, Tajima N, Kawai M, Niwa C, Kurosawa N, Matsuyama T, Yusoff FM, Toda T (2012) Maximum organic loading rate for the single-stage wet anaerobic digestion of food waste. Bioresour Technol 118:210–218

    Google Scholar 

  37. Polizzi C, Alatriste-Mondragón F, Munz G (2018) The role of organic load and ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion of tannery fleshing. Industry 19:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  38. Adiga S, Ramya R, Shankar BB, Patil JH (2012) CR Geetha (2012) Kinetics of anaerobic digestion of water hyacinth, poultry litter, cow manure and primary sludge: a comparative study. Int Proc Chem Biol Environ Eng (IPCBEE) 42:73–78

    Google Scholar 

  39. Widiasa NI, Johari S (2010) The kinetic of biogas production rate from cattle manure in batch mode. Int J Chem Biol Eng 3:39–45

    Google Scholar 

  40. Patil JH, Raj MA, Muralidhara PL, Desai SM, Mahadeva Raju GK (2012) Kinetics of anaerobic digestion of water hyacinth using poultry litter as inoculum. Int J Environ Sci Dev 3:94

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhu B, Petros G, Ruihong Z, James L, Bryan J, Xiujin L (2009) Characteristics and biogas production potential of municipal solid wastes pretreated with a rotary drum reactor. Bioresour Technol 100:1122–1129

    Google Scholar 

  42. Alkaya E, Demirer GN (2011) Anaerobic acidification of sugar-beet processing wastes: effect of operational parameters. Bioenergy 35(1):32–39

    Google Scholar 

  43. Eskicioglu C, Ghorbani M (2011) Effect of inoculum/substrate ratio on mesophilic anaerobic digestion of bioethanol plant whole stillage in batch mode. Process Biochem 46(8):1682–1687

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kawai M, Nagao N, Tajima N, Niwa C, Matsuyama T, Toda T (2014) The effect of the labile organic fraction in food waste and the substrate/inoculum ratio on anaerobic digestion for a reliable methane yield. Bioresour Technol 157:174–180

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lü F, Hao L, Zhu M, Shao L, He P (2012) Initiating methanogenesis of vegetable waste at low inoculum-to-substrate ratio: importance of spatial separation. Bioresour Technol 105:169–173

    Google Scholar 

  46. Neves L, Oliveira R, Alves M (2004) Influence of inoculum activity on the bio-methanization of a kitchen waste under different waste/inoculum ratios. Process Biochem 39(12):2019–2024

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Nakamoto T, Li Y, Yang Y, Utsumi M, Sugiura N (2011) Influence of substrate-to-inoculum ratio on the batch anaerobic digestion of bean curd refuse-Okara under mesophilic conditions. Bioenergy 35(7):3251–3256

    Google Scholar 

  48. Dearman B, Bentham R (2007) Anaerobic digestion of food waste: comparing leachate exchange rates in sequential batch systems digesting food waste and biosolids. Waste Manag 27(12):1792–1799

    Google Scholar 

  49. Metcalf and Eddy (1991) Wastewater engineering: treatment, disposal and reuse. In: Wastewater engineering: treatment, disposal and reuse. Mc Graw Hill Book Co., Singapore

  50. McCarty PL (1964) Anaerobic waste treatment fundamentals. Public Works 95(9):107–112

    Google Scholar 

  51. Berhe S, Leta S (2018) Anaerobic co-digestion of tannery waste water and tannery solid waste using two-stage anaerobic sequencing batch reactor: focus on performances of methanogenic step. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20(3):1468–1482

    Google Scholar 

  52. Aramrueang N, Rapport J, Zhang R (2016) Effects of hydraulic retention time and organic loading rate on performance and stability of anaerobic digestion of Spirulina platensis. Biosyst Eng 147:174–182

    Google Scholar 

  53. Song YC, Sang JK, Jung W (2004) Mesophilic and thermophilic temperature co-phase anaerobic digestion compared with single-stage mesophilic-and thermophilic digestion of sewage sludge. Water Res 38:1653–1662

    Google Scholar 

  54. Strik D, Domnanovich AM, Holubar P (2006) A pH-based control of ammonia in biogas during anaerobic digestion of artificial pig manure and maize silage. Process Biochem 41:1235–1238

    Google Scholar 

  55. Banks CJ, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Heaven S (2012) Trace element requirements for stable food waste digestion at elevated ammonia concentrations. Bioresour Technol 104:127–135

    Google Scholar 

  56. Procházka J, Dolejš P, Máca J, Dohányos M (2012) Stability and inhibition of anaerobic processes caused by insufficiency or excess of ammonia nitrogen. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93(1):439–447

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rahman NNNA, Shahadat M, Won CA, Omar FM (2014) FTIR study and bioadsorption kinetics of bioadsorbent for the analysis of metal pollutants. RSV Adv 4(102):58156–58163

    Google Scholar 

  58. Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M, Witek-Krowiak A (2015) Agricultural waste peels as versatile biomass for water purification—a review. Chem Eng J 270:244–271

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M (2010) Utilization of agro-industrial and municipal waste materials as potential adsorbents for water treatment—a review. Chem Eng J 157(2–3):277–296

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wang T, Tang Z, Guo Y, Zhang X, Yang Q, Xu B, Wang H (2019) Comparison of heavy metal speciation of sludge during mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Waste Biomass Valoriz 1–10

  61. Corbridge D, Lowe EJ (1954) The infra-red spectra of some inorganic phosphorus compounds. J Chem Soc 493–502

  62. Zawadki J (1989) Infrared spectroscopy in surface chemistry of carbons—from chemistry and physics of carbon. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rao CNR (1963) Chemical application of infrared spectroscopy. Academic, New York, p 355

    Google Scholar 

  64. Park D, Yun YS, Park JM (2005) Studies on hexavalent chromium biosorption by chemically-treated biomass of Ecklonia sp. Chemosphere 60(10):1356–1364

    Google Scholar 

  65. LцЁpez VC, Moreno BJ, Sierra RR, Giraldo L, Moreno PJC (2014) Adsorption of volatile carboxylic acids on activated carbon synthesized from watermelon shells. Adsorpt Sci Technol 32(3):227–242

    Google Scholar 

  66. Graham Solomons TW (1998) Organic chemistry. Wiley, Brisbane, p 608

    Google Scholar 

  67. Rahman N, Shahadat M, Won CA, Omar FM (2014) FTIR study and bioadsorption kinetics of bioadsorbent for the analysis of metal pollutants. RSC Adv 4(102):58156–58163

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wang M, Liao L, Zhang X, Li Z, Xia Z, Cao W (2011) Adsorption of low-concentration ammonium onto vermiculite from Hebei Province, China. Miner C 59(5):459–465

    Google Scholar 

  69. Bellamy LJ (1954) The infra-red spectra of complex molecules. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  70. Solum M, Pugmire R, Jagtoyen M, Derbyshire F (1995) Evolution of carbon structure in chemically activated wood. Carbon 33(9):1247–1254

    Google Scholar 

  71. Puziy AM, Poddubnaya OI, Martínez-Alonso A, Suárez-Garcíab F, Tascón JMD (2002) Carbon 40:1493

    Google Scholar 

  72. Guo J, Xu W, Chen WL, Lua AC (2005) Adsorption of NH3 onto activated carbon prepared from palm shells impregnated with H2SO4. J Colloid Interface Sci 281(2):285–290

    Google Scholar 

  73. Zhao Zhiqiang, Yaobin Z, Woodard TL, Nevin KP, Lovley DR (2015) Enhancing syntrophic metabolism in up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors with conductive carbon materials. Bioresour Technol 191:140–145

    Google Scholar 

  74. Xu S (2015) Comparing activated carbon of different particle sizes on enhancing methane generation in upflow anaerobic digester. Bioresour Technol 196:606–612

    Google Scholar 

  75. Appels L, Van Assche A, Willems K, Degrцve J, Van Impe J, Dewil R (2011) Peracetic acid oxidation as an alternative pre-treatment for the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Bioresour Technol 102(5):4124–4130

    Google Scholar 

  76. Horiuchi J, Shimizu T, Kanno T, Kobayashi M (1999) Dynamic behavior in response to pH shift during anaerobic acidogenesis with a chemostat culture. Biotechnol Tech 13(3):155–157

    Google Scholar 

  77. Wijesinghe DTN, Dassanayake KB, Scales P, Sommer S, Chen D (2018) Effect of Australian zeolite on methane production and ammonium removal during anaerobic digestion of swine manure. J Environ Chem Eng 6(1):1233–1241

    Google Scholar 

  78. Gonzalez J, Sanchez M, Gomez X (2018) Enhancing anaerobic digestion: the effect of carbon conductive materials. Carbon 4(4):59

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Bobol, Iran

    Mohammad J. Bardi & Hassan A. Rad

Authors
  1. Mohammad J. Bardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hassan A. Rad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan A. Rad.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bardi, M.J., Rad, H.A. Simultaneous synergistic effects of addition of agro-based adsorbent on anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 22, 65–79 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-019-00911-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-019-00911-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation