Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Life cycle assessment of paper and plastic packaging waste in landfill, incineration, and gasification-pyrolysis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global commodity prices for materials including paper and crude oil have slumped, lowering the value of recyclate, presenting new challenges for the Australian waste and recycling industry. This study assesses the environmental performance of managing (mixed paper and mixed plastic) recyclate in landfill, incineration and gasification-pyrolysis using life cycle assessment (LCA) for impacts including acidification, climate change, photochemical oxidation, and eutrophication potentials. The study finds environmental outcomes can be optimized by separately treating recyclate. Mixed paper treated in incineration or gasification-pyrolysis produces less greenhouse gas emissions than in landfill, whereas mixed plastic is best managed in landfill. The directional outcomes for other pollutants assessed were sensitive to the inclusion of credits from electricity production. The study is significant because waste management in Australia is now considering thermal treatment options, due to diminishing landfill capacities and perceived environmental benefits. Policy changes to waste management systems will benefit from having the ability to predict environmental outcomes based on particular waste types and materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carey A (2017) What a waste: Victoria’s rubbish pile projected to hit 20 million tonnes a year. Fairfax Media http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/what-a-waste-victorias-rubbish-pile-projected-to-hit-20-million-tonnes-a-year-20170803-gxot6x.html. Accessed 24 Aug 2017

  2. Douglas A (2014) Public environmental review response to submissions. Pheonix energy, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  3. New Energy (2014) The Pilbara Waste to Energy Project New Energy Corporation Pty. Ltd, West Perth

  4. Energy New (2016) Waste to energy project East Rockingham. New Energy Corporation Pty, Ltd, West Perth

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weiss J (2016) Why is some plastic recycling no longer cost-effective? Blame fracking. The Dallas Morning News. https://www.dallasnews.com/business/business/2016/07/29/recycling-plastics-longer-makes-economic-sense-blame-fracking. Accessed 16 Aug 2014

  6. Greber J (2016) Commodity price slump makes recycling uneconomical. Australian financial review. Fairfax Media http://www.afr.com/news/economy/commodity-price-slump-makes-recycling-uneconomical-20160416-go80qv. Accessed 18 Apr 2018

  7. CalRecycle (2006) Processing fee cost survey. California Department of Conservation, Division of Recycling, Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  8. CalRecycle (2016) 2015 processing fee and handling fee cost surveys: processing fee final report. California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Sacramento

  9. The Economist (2017) Anti-dumping China tries to keep foreign rubbish out. The Economist https://www.economist.com/news/china/21725815-how-new-rule-could-wallop-recycling-industry-china-tries-keep-foreign-rubbish-out?frsc=dg|e. Accessed 10 Aug 2017

  10. Bowden E (2017) Smoke from Coolaroo fire could cause longterm health problems expert warns. In: The Age Fairfax Media Melbourne

  11. EPA Victoria (2018) Waste in Victoria. EPA Victoria, State Government of Victoria. https://www.epa.vic.gov.au/your-environment/waste. Accessed 28 Oct 2018

  12. Doka G (2003) Life cycle inventories of waste treatment services. Ecoinvent report No. 13, Part II waste incineration swiss centre for life cycle inventories Dubendorf

  13. Hellweg S (2000) Time and site dependent life cycle assessment of thermal waste treatment processes. Dissertation, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich

  14. Rabl A, Spadaro JV, Zoughaib A (2008) Environmental impacts and costs of solid waste: a comparison of landfill and incineration. Waste Manag Res 26:147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith K, O’Farrell K, Brindley F (2012) Waste and recycling in Australia 2011. Hyder Consulting, North Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gavrilescu D (2008) Energy from biomass in pulp and paper mills. Environ Eng Manag 7:537–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Finnveden G, Albertsson A-C, Berendson J, Eriksson E, Höglund LO, Karlsson S, Sundqvist J-O (1995) Solid waste treatment within the framework of life-cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 3:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khoo H (2009) Life cycle impact assessment of various waste conversion technologies. Waste Manage Res 29:1892–1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grant T, James K, Partl H (2003) Life cycle assessment of waste and resource recovery options (including energy from waste). Report for EcoRecycle Victoria. RMIT University, Melbourne

  20. Grant T, James K, Lundie S, Sonneveld K (2001) Stage 2 report for life cycle assessment for paper and packaging waste management scenarios in Victoria. RMIT University, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carre A, Crossin E, Clune S (2013) LCA of Kerbside recycling in Victoria. Report for Sustainability Victoria. RMIT University Centre for Design, Melbourne

  22. Edwards J, Othman M, Crossin E, Burn S (2017) Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal food waste and sewage sludge: A comparative life cycle assessment in the context of a waste service provision. Biores Technol 223:237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hadzic A, Voca N, Golubic S (2017) Life-cycle assessment of solid-waste management in city of Zagreb. Croatia. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20(2):1286–1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0693-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zaman A (2010) Comparative study of municipal solid waste treatment technologies using life cycle assessment method. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7(2):225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Demetrious A, Verghese K, Stasinopoulos P, Crossin E (2018) Comparison of alternative methods for managing the residual of material recovery facilities using life cycle assessment. Resour Conserv Recycl 136:33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Björklund A, Finnveden G (2005) Recycling revisited—life cycle comparisons of global warming impact and total energy use of waste management strategies. Resour Conserv Recycl 44: 309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Song H-S, Hyun JC (1999) A study on the comparison of the various waste management scenarios for PET bottles using the life-cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Resour Conserv Recycl 27: 267–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Finnveden G, Johansson J, Lind P, Moberg A (2005) Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 1: general methodology and results. J Clean Prod 13:213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Moberg Å, Finnveden G, Johansson J, Lind P (2005) Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 2: landfilling compared to other treatment methods. J Clean Prod 13:231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vehlow J, Bergfeldt B, Visser R, Wilén C (2007) European Union waste management strategy and the importance of biogenic waste. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 9:130–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gentil E, Christensen T, Aoustin E (2009) Greenhouse gas accounting and waste management. Waste Manag Res 27:696–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. International Standardization Organization (2006) ISO14040: 2006(E) Environmental management—life cycle assessment-principles and framework. International Standardization Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  33. Doka G (2003) Life Cycle Inventories of Waste Treatment Services. ecoinvent report No. 13. Part I. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dubendorf

  34. Doka G (2013) Updates to Life Cycle Inventories of Waste Treatment Services—part II: waste incineration. Doka Life Cycle Assessments, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  35. Life Cycle Strategies (2015) Australasian life cycle inventory database version 2015.02. AusLCI, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  36. AusLCI (2015) Australian life cycle inventories database version 2015.02. AusLCI, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  37. IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories volume 5: waste intergovernmental panel on climate change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Kanagawa

  38. Doka G (2009) Life cycle inventories of waste treatment services. Ecoinvent report No.13. Part II. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dubendorf

  39. Pickin J (2010) Comparative greenhouse gas life cycle assessment of Wollert landfill. Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd., Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  40. Commonwealth of Australia (2015) Electricity generation in Australian states, by fuel type, physical units, Office of the Chief Economist, Editor. Department of Industry and Science

  41. Renouf MA, Grant T, Sevenster M, Logie J, Ridoutt B, Ximenes F, Bengtsson J, Cowie A, Lane J (2018) Best Practice Guide for Mid-Point Life Cycle Impact Assessment in Australia ALCAS

  42. IPCC (2007) Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom

  43. Institute of Environmental Sciences (2016) CML-IA Characterisation Factors. Leiden University. https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/research/research-output/science/cml-ia-characterisation-factors. Accessed 18 Mar 2017

  44. Commonwealth of Australia (2017) National Inventory Report 2015. Department of Environment and Energy, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  45. Commonwealth of Australia (2017) National Greenhouse gas inventory total, carbon dioxide equivalent emissions, 2015, Kyoto Accounting. Department of Environment and Energy. http://ageis.climatechange.gov.au/. Accessed 3 Nov 2017

  46. Bengtsson J, Howard N, Kneppers B (2010) Weighting of environmental impacts in Australia. ALCAS and Building Products Innovation Council

  47. Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability (2008) BEES + Version 4.05. National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg

  48. Clift R, Doig A, Finnveden G (2000) The Application of life cycle assessment to integrated solid waste management: part 1—methodology. Process Saf Environ Prot 78:279–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Allesch A, Brunner P (2014) Assessment methods for solid waste management: a literature review. Waste Manag Res 32:461–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Golsteijn L (2015) Behind the scenes at Monte Carlo simulations. PRé Consultants. https://simapro.com/2015/behind-the-scenes-at-monte-carlo-simulations/. Accessed 18 Jan 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Demetrious.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 17 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demetrious, A., Crossin, E. Life cycle assessment of paper and plastic packaging waste in landfill, incineration, and gasification-pyrolysis. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 21, 850–860 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-019-00842-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-019-00842-4

Keywords

Navigation