Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recent developments in Korea’s Framework Act on Resource Circulation: toward a resource-circulating society

  • REVIEW
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Korea is moving toward a sustainable resource-circulating society to fight climate change and resource scarcity. To achieve this goal, the Framework Act on Resource Circulation (FRC) was enacted on May 29, 2016 and came into effect on January 1, 2018. This act not only acknowledges the importance of resource efficiency and the transition to a resource-circulating society, but also plays a significant role in the progress of important and relevant market and industry developments. This study primarily focuses on an analysis of the FRC. It aims to evaluate key concepts such as a resource-circulating society, circular resources, important provisions including major principles and allocation of responsibilities, and measures to be taken to promote resource circulation. In addition, it explores whether the FRC is sufficiently comprehensive and ambitious to contribute to the transition to a more resource-circulating society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

(data source: Status of waste treatment and generation, MOE and Korea Environment Corporation 2016)

Fig. 2

(data source: Status of waste treatment and generation, MOE and Korea Environment Corporation, 2016)

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

(data source: 2016 New and Renewable Energy Statistics, MOTIE)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Ministry of Environment (2016) Framework Act on Resource Circulation

  2. Ministry of Environment (2016) White paper of environment

  3. OECD (2017) OECD environmental performance reviews: Korea 2017. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264268265-en

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. The World Bank (2018) http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/korea/overview. Accessed 2 Jun 2018

  5. The Ministry of Environment (2016) Statistics on waste generation and treatment 2015

  6. The Ministry of Environment (1986) The waste management act

  7. The Ministry of Environment (1992) The act on the promotion of saving and recycling of resources

  8. Hahm T-S, Park G-S (2015) Environmental law, 7th ed. Pakyoungsa, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (2008) The marine environment management act

  10. US EPA, Learn about Ocean Dumping (2017) https://www.epa.gov/ocean-dumping/learn-about-ocean-dumping. Accessed 1 Dec 2017

  11. The Korea Times (2015) Murim, Sajo top list of ocean polluters

  12. Yang W-S, Park J-K, Park S-W, Seo Y-C (2015) Past, present and future of waste management in Korea. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 17:207–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-014-0301-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taranic I, Behrens A, Topi C (2016) Understanding the circular economy in Europe, from resource efficiency to sharing platforms: The CEPS Framework. CEPS Special Report No. 143

  14. European Commission (2015) Closing the loop—an EU action plan for the circular economy. COM (2015) 614 final

  15. European Commission (2008) Waste framework directive 2008/98/EC

  16. Fischer C (2011) The development and achievements of EU waste policy. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 13:2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moriguchi Y (2007) Material flow indicators to measure progress toward a sound material-cycle society. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 9:112–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gao L (2016) An analysis on Japan’s circular economy and its effects on Japan’s economic development. Int Bus Manag 13(2):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ji H, Zhang Y, Hao L (2012) Analyses of Japanese circular economy mode and its inspiration significance for China. Adv Asian Soc Sci 3:4

    Google Scholar 

  20. Environmental Agency Japan (2000) Fundamental law for establishing a sound material-cycle society. Law No.110 of 2000

  21. Sakai S, Yoshida H, Hirai Y, Asari M, Takigami H, Takahashi S, Tomoda K, Peeler M, Wejchert J, Schmid-Unterseh T, Douyan AR, Hathaway R, Hylander LD, Fischer C, Oh GJ, Jinhui L, Chi NK (2011) International comparative study of 3R and waste management policy developments. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 13:86–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoshida H, Shimamura K, Aizawa H (2007) 3R strategies for the establishment of an international sound material-cycle society. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 9:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yong R (2007) The circular economy in China. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 9:121–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McDowall W, Geng Y, Huang B, Barteková E, Bleischwitz R, Türkeli S, Kemp R, Doménech T (2017) Circular economy policies in China and Europe. J Ind Ecol 21(3):651–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. http://english.mep.gov.cn/Resources/laws/envir_elatedlaws/201712/t20171212_427823.shtml

  26. Liu L, Liang Y, Song Q, Li J (2017) A review of waste prevention through 3R under the concept of circular economy in China. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19:1314–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li J, Yu K (2011) A study on legislative and policy tools for promoting the circular economic model for waste management in China. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 13:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ghisellini P, Cialani C, Ulgiati S (2016) A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J Clean Prod 114:11–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kalmykova Y, Sadagopan M, Rosado L (2017) Circular economy—from review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools. Resour Conserv Recycl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu C, Côté R (2017) A framework for integrating ecosystem services into China’s circular economy: the case of eco-industrial parks. Sustain MDPI Open Access J 9(9):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  31. Malinauskaite J, Jouhara H, Spencer N (2017) Waste prevention and technologies in the context of the EU waste framework directive: lost in translation? 26 European energy and environmental law review. Issue 3:66–80

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kim H (2017) The appraisal and the tasks of the Framework Act on Resource Circulation. Environ Law Rev 39(1):73–100

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chun J-K (2008) Change and adaption of legal concepts about waste and circular resources. Environ Law Rev 30(3):609–627

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (2006) The energy act

  35. European Commission (2017) Communication on the role of waste-to-energy in the circular economy

  36. Lee I-S, Kang H-YA Review on the direction of the Framework Act on Resource Circulation for establishing a resource circulation society. J Korean Inst Resourc Recycl 25(6):82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Römph TJ (2016) Terminological challenges to the incorporation of landfill mining in EU waste law in view of the circular economy. Eur Energy Environ Law Rev 25(4):106–119

    Google Scholar 

  38. Piguet F-P, Meylan F, Largey T, Erkman S (2017) Recycling and utilisation of carbon dioxide. Eur Energy Environ Law Rev Issue 26(1):2–12

    Google Scholar 

  39. Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 (2009) April 2009 on the geological storage of carbon dioxide and amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC, European Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001//80/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 (1). Off J Eur Union L140:114–135

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lee K, Cha J (2016) EU legal framework for the geological storage of carbon dioxide and its challenges. J Korean Soc Miner Energy Resour Eng 53(4):348–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy Good Recycled Products Information System (2017) http://www.buygr.or.kr/. Accessed 11 Aug 2017

  42.  http://www.newsgeoje.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=3372. Accessed 11 Aug 2017

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement and Busan Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Energy and Mineral Resources Engineering, Dong-A University, Pusan, 49315, Republic of Korea

    Kyounga Lee & Jongmun Cha

Authors
  1. Kyounga Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jongmun Cha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jongmun Cha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, K., Cha, J. Recent developments in Korea’s Framework Act on Resource Circulation: toward a resource-circulating society. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20, 1986–1998 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0756-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0756-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation