Advertisement

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 1090–1098 | Cite as

Sago pith waste ash as a potential raw material for ceramic and geopolymer fabrication

  • Mohamad Rohaidzat bin Mohamed Rashid
  • Mustafa Juma A. Mijarsh
  • Hazman Seli
  • Megat Azmi Megat Johari
  • Zainal Arifin Ahmad
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 193 Downloads

Abstract

This study focuses on the potential usage of sago pith waste ash (SPWA) obtained from sago pith waste (SPW) calcined from 500 to 1000 °C. SPWA was characterized by TGA/DTA, XRD, XRF, FTIR, and FESEM incorporating with EDX. About 4% of SPWA was generated from each tonne of SPW at 700 °C as the optimum calcination temperature as indicated by thermal analysis. The phases found in SPWA at calcination temperatures of less than 800 °C are quartz, calcite, and magnesite. XRF analysis found that SPWA was mainly composed of CaO and SiO2 with the presence of other oxides such as MgO, Fe2O3, and Al2O3. Both CaO and SiO2 are very significant oxides as they can be used as an alternative binder for the synthesis of geopolymer products, especially in combination with other ashes such as fly ash (FA). Geopolymers fabricated from FA partially substituted with SPWA showed a 5% increase in compressive strength. Therefore, the benefits of SPWA are twofold: first, as a resource of renewable energy generated through the burning of SPW which can be utilized by related industries, and second, SPWA itself becomes a potential raw material for the production of ceramic and geopolymer products.

Keywords

Sago pith waste Characterization Calcination temperatures Geopolymer 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the financial support from Universiti Sains Malaysia through the Research University Grant Scheme 001/PBAHAN/811212 and also the Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) academic staff scholarship (500-BPD (JPbSM/BB. 14)). Special thanks to River Link Sago Resources Sdn. Bhd. for providing the sago pith waste.

References

  1. 1.
    Lai JC, Wan Abdul Rahman WA, Toh WY (2013) Characterisation of sago pith waste and its composites. Ind Crops Prod 45:319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Singhal RS, Kennedy JF, Gopalakrishnan SM, Kaczmarek A, Knill CJ, Akmar PF (2008) Industrial production, processing, and utilization of sago palm-derived products. Carbohydr Polym 72:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abdul Aziz S (2002) Sago starch and its utilisation. J Biosci Bioeng 94:526–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Savitha S, Sadhasivam S, Swaminathan K, Lin KF (2009) A prototype of proposed treatment plant for sago factory effluent. J Clean Prod 17:1363–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Awg Adeni DS, Abd Aziz S, Bujang K, Hassan MA (2010) Bioconversion of sago residue into value added products. Afr J Biotechnol 9(14):2016–2021Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Igura M, Okazaki M (2010) Cadmium sorption characteristics of phosphorylated sago starch-extraction residue. J Hazard Mater 178:686–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tan XW, Romainor AN, Chin SF, Ng SM (2014) Carbon dots production via pyrolysis of sago waste as potential probe for metal ions sensing. J Anal Appl Pyrol 105:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wan Mohamad Daud WSA, Abdullah N, Yok MCK, Muhammad Azmi S (2010) Sago kraft paper: a potential solution to sago industry pollution. IEEE Int Conf Adv Manag Sci (ICAMS) 1:80–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vikineswary S, Shim YL, Thambirajah JJ, Blakebrough N (1994) Possible microbial utilization of sago processing wastes. Resour Conserv Recycl 11:289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Quek SY, Wase DAJ, Forster CF (1998) The use of sago waste for the sorption of lead and copper. Water SA 24(3):251–256Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kadirvelu K, Kavipriya M, Karthika C, Vennilamani N, Pattabhi S (2004) Mercury (II) adsorption by activated carbon made from sago waste. Carbon 42:745–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zainab N, Khairul Aidil Azlin A, Nazlina S, Hasnain H, Norhaizat S, Teng JX, Lawai V (2013) Production of fire-retardant sound-absorbing panels from sago waste. J Trop For Sci 25(4):510–515Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thangavelu SK, Ahmed AS, Ani FN (2014) Bioethanol production from sago pith waste using microwave hydrothermal hydrolysis accelerated by carbon dioxide. Appl Energy 128:277–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Della VP, Kuhn I, Hotza D (2002) Rice husk ash as an alternate source for active silica production. Mater Lett 57:818–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nazari A, Bagheri A, Riahi S (2011) Properties of geopolymer with seeded fly ash and rice husk bark ash. Mater Sci Eng A 528:7395–7401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cordeiro GC, Toledo FRD, Fairbairn EMR (2009) Effect of calcination temperature on the pozzolanic activity of sugar cane bagasse ash (SCBA). Constr Build Mater 23:3301–3303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morales EV, Villar-cocina E, Frias M, Santos SF, Savastano JH (2009) Effects of calcining conditions on the microstructure of sugar cane waste ashes (SCWA) Influence in the pozzolanic activation. Cem Concr Compos 31:22–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frias M, Villar-Cocina E, Morales EV (2007) Characterisation of sugar cane straw waste as pozzolanic material for construction calcining temperature and kinetic parameters. Waste Manag 27:533–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sugumaran KR, Jothi P, Ponnusami V (2014) Bioconversion of industrial solid waste—cassava bagasse for pullulan production in solid state fermentation. Carbohydr Polym 99:22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pandey A, Soccol CR, Nigam P, Soccol VT, Vandenberghe LPS, Mohan R (2000) Biotechnological potential of agro industrial residues. II cassava bagasse. Bioresour Technol 74:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chandara C, Sakai E, Mohd Azizli KA, Ahmad ZA, Saiyid Hashim SF (2010) The effect of unburned carbon in palm oil fuel ash on fluidity of cement pastes containing superplasticizer. Constr Build Mater 24:1590–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chandara C, Mohd Azizli KA, Ahmad ZA, Saiyid Hashim SF, Sakai E (2012) Heat of hydration of blended cement containing treated ground palm oil fuel ash. Constr Build Mater 27:78–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yusuf MO, Megat Johari MA, Ahmad ZA, Maslehuddin M (2014) Effects of H2O/Na2O molar ratio on the strength of alkaline activated ground blast furnace slag-ultrafine palm oil fuel ash based concrete. Mater Des 56:158–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Salih MA, Abang Ali AA, Farzadnia N (2014) Characterization of mechanical and microstructural properties of palm oil fuel ash geopolymer cement paste. Constr Build Mater 65:592–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Joseph B, Mathew G (2012) Influence of aggregate content on the behavior of fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Sci Iran 19(5):1188–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    ASTM C109/C109M-12 (2012) Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars using 2-in (50 mm) cube specimen. In: Annual book of ASTM standards 2012Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Temuujin J, van Riessen A (2009) Effect of fly ash preliminary calcination on the properties of geopolymer. J Hazard Mater 164:634–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ranjbar N, Mehrali M, Behnia A, Alengaram JU, Jumaat MZ (2014) Compressive strength and microstructural analysis of fly ash/palm oil fuel ash based geopolymer mortar. Mater Des 59:532–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mijarsh MJA, Megat Johari MA, Ahmad ZA (2014) Synthesis of geopolymer from large amounts of treated palm oil fuel ash: application of the Taguchi method in investigating the main parameters affecting compressive strength. Constr Build Mater 52:473–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nazari A, Sanjayan JG (2015) Synthesis of geopolymer from industrial wastes. J Clean Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.003 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Temuujin J, van Riessen A, Mackenzie KJD (2010) Preparation and characterisation of fly ash based geopolymer mortars. Constr Build Mater 24:1906–1910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Van Jaarsveld JGS, van Deventer JSJ, Lukey GC (2003) The characterisation of source materials in fly ash-based geopolymers. Mater Lett 57:1272–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Choi SJ, Jun SS, Oh JE, Monteiro PJM (2010) Properties of alkali-activated systems with stone powder sludge. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 12:275–282. doi: 10.1007/s10163-010-0297-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hu HY, Liu H, Zhang Q, Zhang PA, Li AJ, Yao H, Naruse I (2014) Sintering characteristics of CaO-rich municipal solid waste incineration fly ash through the addition of Si/Al-rich ash residues. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. doi: 10.1007/s10163-014-0341-z Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    He J, Jie Y, Zhang J, Yu Y, Zhang G (2013) Synthesis and characterization of red mud and rice husk ash-based geopolymer composites. Cem Concr Compos 37:108–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chi M, Huang R (2013) Binding mechanism and properties of alkali activated fly-ash/slag mortars. Constr Build Mater 40:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Detphan S, Chindaprasirt P (2009) Preparation of fly ash and rice husk ash geopolymer. Int J Miner Metall and Mater 16(6):720–726Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dara DR, Bhogayata AC (2015) Experimental study of RHA-FA based geopolymer composites. Int J Sci Res Dev 3:1615–1617Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shalini A, Gurunarayanan G, Sakthivel S (2016) Performance of rice husk ash in geopolymer concrete. Int J Innov Res Sci Tech 2:73–77Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Osman Z, Arof AK (2003) FTIR studies of chitosan acetate based polymer electrolytes. Electrochim Acta 48:993–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dyer J, Ambers J (2012) Analysis of a yellow coating on the hair of a marble bust of Meleager. Department Of Conservation and Scientific Research 13 December 2012. http://www.britishmuseum.org/csrmellonpdfs/AR2012-79_u.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2015
  42. 42.
    Boke H, Cizer O, Ipekoglu B, Ugurlu E, Serifaki K, Toprak G (2008) Characteristics of lime produced from limestone containing diatoms. Constr Build Mater 22:866–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jovanovski G, Makreski P, Kaitner B, Boev B (2009) Silicate minerals from Macedonia. Complementary use of vibrational spectroscopy and X-ray powder diffraction for identification and detection purposes. Croat Chem Acta 82(2):363–386Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kumar RS, Rajkumar P (2014) Characterization of minerals in air dust particles in the state of Tamilnadu, India through FTIR, XRD and SEM analyses. J Infrared Phys Technol 67:30–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Chindaprasirt P, Jaturapitakkul C, Chalee W, Rattanasak U (2009) Comparative study on the characteristics of fly ash and bottom ash geopolymers. Waste Manag 29:539–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Mallicoat SW, Kriven WM, Van Deventer JS (2005) Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties. Colloids Surf A 269(1):47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamad Rohaidzat bin Mohamed Rashid
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mustafa Juma A. Mijarsh
    • 3
  • Hazman Seli
    • 4
  • Megat Azmi Megat Johari
    • 5
  • Zainal Arifin Ahmad
    • 1
  1. 1.Structural Materials Niche Area, School of Materials and Mineral Resources EngineeringUniversiti Sains MalaysiaNibong TebalMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Civil EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi MARA, Samarahan KampusKota SamarahanMalaysia
  3. 3.Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of EngineeringAl-Mergeb UniversityAl-KhumsLibya
  4. 4.Faculty of Computer and Mathematical SciencesUniversiti Teknologi MARA, Samarahan KampusKota SamarahanMalaysia
  5. 5.School of Civil EngineeringUniversiti Sains MalaysiaNibong TebalMalaysia

Personalised recommendations