Advertisement

Potential of biogas production from mixed leaf and food waste in anaerobic reactors

  • Klinpratoom Panyaping
  • Phisittapong Moontee
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 156 Downloads

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion of mixed leaf (MLW) and food wastes (FW) was used to explore the potential use of MLW as an accelerator for FW digestion in two parts for biogas production and as a waste management option in a university community. The effects of the single substrate of FW, co-digestion, ratio of MLW and FW (3:2 and 2:3) and ratio of waste feed to inoculum: F/I (0.1 and 0.4), and feeding frequency (every other day and every 2 days) were evaluated in two neutralized anaerobic reactors. The results showed that different mixture ratios with the same F/I ratio were the major factor on biogas (39.87 m3/kg VSadded) and CH4 yield (25.99 m3/kg VSadded), including %COD removal (84.50%). Co-digestion had the same effect as F/I on biogas production. Only FW provided the lowest biogas and CH4 yield. The use of a MLW:FW 2:3, F/I 0.4 mixture with every 2 days feeding provided higher biogas production and %COD removal than with every other day feeding. Two neutralized anaerobic reactors were suitable for digestion with a high F/I, and a wider interval feeding. This finding affirms the possibility of biogas production using MLW as the co-substrate with FW, as opposed to using FW alone.

Keywords

Mixed leaf waste Food waste Two anaerobic reactors Biogas production 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna [58-HRL-021].

References

  1. 1.
    Panyaping K (2009) Solid waste management in Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, Northern campus, Report in academic year 2007–2008. Chiang MaiGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    European Biogas Association (EBA) (2013) Dry anaerobic digestion biogas plant “Biodigester I” at the University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh. BIOfermenergyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosenberg A (2016) College campuses take on food waste. UC Newsroom Monday, 2 May 2016 http://universityofcalifornia.edu/news/college-campuses-take-food-waste. Accessed 13 Oct 2016
  4. 4.
    Panyaping K, Suthinan N, Thananchai P, Muangkhunjai U (2011) Development of leaves and petioles waste of Longan to generate biogas and by products. KKU Res J 17(4):543–555Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tambone F, Genevini P, D’Imporzano G, Adani F (2009) Assessing amendment properties of digestate by studying the organic matter composition and the degree of biological stability during the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of MSW. Bioresour Technol 100:3140–3142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Suryawanshi PC, Chaudhari AB, Kothari RM (2010) Mesophilic anaerobic digestion: first option for waste treatment in tropical regions. Crit Rev Biotechnol 30(4):259–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parawira W, Murto M, Zvauya R, Mattiasson B (2004) Anaerobic batch digestion of solid potato waste alone and in combination with sugar beet leaves. Renew Energy 29(2004):1811–1823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Swapnavhini K, Srinivas T, Kumar PL, Kumari MS, Laksami T (2010) Feasibility study of anaerobic digestion of Ocimum Sanctum leaf waste generated from Sanctum Sanctorium. Bioresources 5(1):389–396Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rouf MA, Islam MS, Rabeya T, Mondal AK (2015) Anaerobic digestion of mixed dried fallen leaves by mixing with cow dung. Bangladesh J Sci Ind Res 50(3):163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Samuel PO (2015) Production of biogas from perennial and biennial crop wastes: peach palm and banana’s wastes on alternative biomass in energy generation and environmental sustainability. AJEE 5(4):78–79. doi: 10.5923/j.ajee.20150504.01 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Levis JW, Barlaz MA, Themelis NJ, Ulloa P (2010) Assessment of the state of food waste treatment in the United States and Canada. Waste Manag. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.031 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang R, El-Mashad HM, Hartman H, Wang F, Liu G, Choate C, Gamble P (2007) Characterization of food waste as feedstock for anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 98:929–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Foster-Carnerio T, Perez M, Romero LI (2008) Influence of total solid and inoculum contents on performance of anaerobic reactors treating food waste. Bioresour Technol 99:6994–7002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen X, Romano TR, Zhang R (2010) Anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production. Int J Agric Biol Eng 3(4):61–72Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu C (2014) Food waste treatment options at the University of Cincinnati: life cycle assessment and economic evaluation MS thesis, University of CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khalid A, Arshad M, Anjum M, Mahmood T, Dawson L (2011) The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste. Waste Manag 31:1737–1744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Espito G, Frunzo L, Giordano Liotta F, Panico A, Pirozzi F (2012) Anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 11:325–341. doi: 10.1007/s11157-012-9277-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bouallagui H, Lahdhab H, Ben Romdan E, Rachdi B, Hamdi M (2009) Improvement of fruit and vegetable waste anaerobic digestion performance and stability with co-substrates addition. J Environ Manag 90:1844–1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee DH, Behara SK, Kim J, Park HS (2009) Methane production potential of leachate generated from Korean food waste recycling facilities: a lab scale study. Waste Manag 29(2):876–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Swayama S, Tada C, Tsukahara K, Yagishita T (2004) Effect of ammonium addition on methanogenic community in a fluidized bed anaerobic digestion. J Biosci Bioeng 97:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li R, Chen S, Li X (2010) Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with diary manure in a two-phase digestion system. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 160:643–654. doi: 10.1007/s12010-009-8533-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cuetos MJ, Fernadez C, Gomez X, Moran A (2011) Anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure with energy crop residues. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 16:1044–1052. doi: 10.1007/s12257-011-0117-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wan S, Sun L, Sun J, Luo W (2013) Biogas production and microbial community change during the co-digestion of food waste with Chinese silver grass in a single-stage anaerobic reactor. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 18:1022–1030. doi: 10.1007/s12257-013-0128-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Manusseri S (2007) Principle of pomology. Pimpaluck, SongkhlaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Veesommai U, Siriphanich S, Menakanit A, Pichakum N (2013) Plants for landscape architectural uses in Thailand I. H.N. Group, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tchobanoglous G, Burton LF, Stensel DH, Metcalf & Eddy (2008) Wastewater engineering, treatment and reuse. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    APHA (2005) Standard method for the examination of water and wastewater. APHA-AWWA-WEF, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dobre P, Nicolae F, Matei F (2014) Main factors affecting biogas production—an overview. Romanian Biotechnol Lett 19:9283–9296Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weiland P (2010) Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:849–860. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hidelgo D, Martin-Marroquin JM, Sastre E (2013) Single-phase and two-phase anaerobic co-digestion of residues from the treatment process of waste vegetable oil and pig manure. Bioenergy Res 7:670–680. doi: 10.1017/s12155-013-9396-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Deng W, Lobo R, Setthapun W, Christensen TS, Elam WJ, Marshall LC (2011) Oxidative hydrolysis of cellobiose to glucose. Catal Lett 14(4):498–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ezekoye VA, Ezekoye BA, Offor PO (2011) Effect of retention time on biogas production from poultry droppings and cassava peels. Niger J Biotechnol 22:53–59Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yang YQ, Shen DS, Li N, Xu D, Long YY, Lu XY (2013) Co-digestion of kitchen waste and fruit-vegetable waste by two-phase anaerobic digestion. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 20(4):2162–2171. doi: 10.1007/s11356-012-1414-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chiayapong P, Chavalparit O (2016) Enhancement of biogas production potential from Acacia leaf waste using alkaline pre-treatment and co-digestion. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18:427–436. doi:10.1007/s10163-016-0469-02162-2171. doi:10.1007/s11356-012-1414-yGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kacprzak A, Krzystek L, Ledakowicz S (2010) Co-digestion of agricultural and industrial wastes. Chem Pap 64(2):127–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lin J, Zuo J, Gan L, Li P, Liu F, Wang K, Chen L, Gan H (2011) Effects of mixture ratio on anaerobic co-digestion with fruit and vegetable waste and food waste of China. J Environ Sci 23(8):1403–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Azbar N, Speece ER (2001) Two-phase, two-stage, and single-stage anaerobic process comparison. J Environ Eng 3(127):240–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Liu G, Zhang R, El-Mashad HM, Dong R (2009) Effect of feed to inoculum ratios on biogas yields of food and green wastes. Bioresour Technol 100:5103–5108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mata-Alvarez J, Mace S, Liabres P, Astlas S (2000) Co-digestion of solid wastes: a review of its uses and perspectives including modeling. Crit Rev Biotecnol 31:99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Orhon D, Cokgor UE (1997) COD fractionation in wastewater characterization—the state of the art. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 68:283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringRajamangala University of Technology LannaChiang MaiThailand

Personalised recommendations