Skip to main content

Analysis of waste generation variables and people’s attitudes towards waste management system: a case of Bangkok, Thailand

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management volume 19, pages 645–656 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

Having accurate data of municipal solid waste generation amount is an indispensable factor for effective planning of a waste management system. However, to have accurate estimation, significant waste generation factors have to be identified. In this study, Bangkok is selected as representative of urban cities in developing countries. The city has coped with consequences of a vast amount of waste generation and ineffective waste management system for years. The study aims to examine influential variables affecting generation amount and management problems in Bangkok based on people’s attitudes. Questionnaire surveys and interviews are methods of acquiring primary data. To verify reliability of obtained data, statistical analyses are conducted using the methods of descriptive analysis, hypothesis test, and Pearson correlation. The study shows seven influential waste generation variables. In addition, to learn the exact situation of waste management system, interview results are qualitatively evaluated using stakeholder analysis and TOWS matrix. Stakeholders’ points of concerns and suggested waste management solutions are identified for using in the formulation of waste management plan. The results of this study can facilitate a thorough evaluation as inputs of future research for sustainable waste management system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Anghinolfi D, Paolucci M, Robba M, Taramasso AC (2013) A dynamic optimization model for solid waste recycling. Waste Manag 33:287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Turner RK, Powell J (1991) Towards an integrated waste management strategy. Environ Manag Health 2:6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Seik F (1997) Recycling of domestic wastes: early experiences in Singapore. Habitat Int 21(3):277–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson D (2007) Development drivers for waste management. Waste Manage Res 25:198–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Faccio M, Persona A, Zanin G (2011) Waste collection multi objective model with real time traceability data. Waste Manag 31(12):2391–2405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Department of Environment (DOE) (2013) Handbook of community based solid waste management. Mataka Press, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  7. Babayemi O, Dauda T (2009) Evaluation of solid waste generation, categories and disposal options in developing countries: a case study of Nigeria. J Appl Sci Environ Manag 13(3):83–88

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thanh P, Matsuri Y, Fujiwara T (2010) Household solid waste generation and characteristic in a Mekong Delta city, Vietnam. J Environ Manag 91:2307–2321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Buenrostro O, Bocco G (2003) Solid waste management in municipalities in Mexico: goals and perspectives. Resour Conserv Recycl 39:251–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eriksson O, Bisaillon M (2011) Multiple system modelling of waste management. Waste Manag 31:2620–2630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen HW, Chen JC, Chang NB (2010) Environmental performance evaluation of large-scale municipal incinerators using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Waste Manag 30(7):1371–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. United Nations (UN) (2014) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, New York, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, the United Nations Secretariat

  13. Bangkok Statistics Report (2013) From Bangkok Statistics Report—Social perspective (2013) http://office.bangkok.go.th/pipd/07Stat%28Th%29/Stat_57_6M/TH_SOCIAL_2556.pdf. Accessed 17 Mar 2015

  14. Bangkok Waste Generation (2013) From Bangkok Metropolitan administration—waste generation by district http://203.155.220.174/modules.php?name=activeshow_mod&file=article&asid=249. Accessed 17 Mar 2015

  15. Bangkok Environment Report (2012) From Bangkok State of the environment (2010–2011) http://203.155.220.174/pdf/AW_BKKEnvironmentReport2010-2011.pdf. Accessed 01 Dec 2014

  16. Public Cleansing Department (PCD) (2014) From Solid waste and nightsoil management in Bangkok http://portal.bangkok.go.th/subsite/index.php?strOrgID=001054. 13 Jan 2014

  17. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2009) Waste quantification—Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Report on waste quantification and characterization

  18. Kawai K, Tasaki T (2015) Revisiting estimates of municipal solid waste generation per capita and their reliability. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage. doi:10.1007/s10163-015-0355-1

    Google Scholar 

  19. Otoma S, Hoang H, Hong H, Miyazaki I, Diaz R (2013) A survey on municipal solid waste and residents’ awareness in Da Nang city, Vietnam. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 15(2):187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lebersorger S, Beigl P (2011) Municipal solid waste generation in municipalities: quantifying impacts of household structure, commercial waste and domestic fuel. Waste Manag 31:1907–1915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Beigl P, Lebersorger S, Salhofer S (2008) Modelling municipal solid waste generation: a review. Waste Manag 28:200–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Anderson M, Larsen V (2012) FRIDA: a model for the generation and handling of solid waste in Denmark. Resour Conserv Recycl 65:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mundo D, Rebancos C, Alaira S (2009) Correlation of socio-economic status, environmental awareness, knowledge, and perception on solid waste management practices in Barangays Talisay and Balibago, Calatagan, Batangas, Philippines. J Environ Sci Manag 12(2):27–37

    Google Scholar 

  24. Abduli A, Azimi E (2010) Municipal waste reduction potential and related strategies in Tehran. Int J Environ Res 4(4):901–912

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dangi B, Pretz R, Urynowicz A, Gerowb G, Reddy M (2011) Municipal solid waste generation in Kathmandu, Nepal. J Environ Manag 92:240–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ogwueleka C (2013) Survey of household waste composition and quantities in Abuja, Nigeria. Resour Conserv Recycl 77:52–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kollikkathara N, Feng H, Yu D (2010) A system dynamic modeling approach for evaluating municipal solid waste generation, landfill capacity and related cost management issues. Waste Manag 30:2194–2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eagly H, Chaiken S (2007) The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social Cogn 25:582–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jibrila D, Sipanb B, Sapric M, Shikad A, Isae M, Abdullah S (2012) 3R’s Critical success factor in solid waste management system for higher educational institutions. Procedia Social Behav Sci 65:626–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jungrungrueng S (2014) Bangkok towards sustainable waste management. The management of the Sai Mai waste transfer and disposal station, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yamane T (1983) Statistics—an introductory analysis, 2nd edn. Harper and Row, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. MacQueen KM, McLellan E, Metzger DS, Kegeles S, Strauss RP, Scotti R, Blanchard L, Trotter RT II (2001) What is community? An evidence-based definition for participatory public health. Am J Public Health 91(12):1929–1938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2009) Developing Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan, Training Manual. Volume 3: Targets and Issues of Concern for ISWM: 32

  34. National Statistical Office (NSO) (2014) http://web.nso.go.th/. Accessed 13 Jan 2014

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the officers and staff of the BMA for important on-site data support at waste transfer stations. This study was supported under a grant in the SIIT-JAIST-NECTEC Dual Doctoral Degree Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management Technology, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Bangkadi Campus, 131M. 5, Tiwanont Road, Bangkadi, Muang, Pathum Thani, 12000, Thailand

    Pitchayanin Sukholthaman & Pisit Chanvarasuth

  2. School of Bio-Chemical Engineering and Technology, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Rangsit Campus, Thammasat Rangsit Post Office, P.O. Box 22, Pathum Thani, 12121, Thailand

    Alice Sharp

Authors
  1. Pitchayanin Sukholthaman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pisit Chanvarasuth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alice Sharp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pitchayanin Sukholthaman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sukholthaman, P., Chanvarasuth, P. & Sharp, A. Analysis of waste generation variables and people’s attitudes towards waste management system: a case of Bangkok, Thailand. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19, 645–656 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-015-0456-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-015-0456-x

Keywords

  • Municipal solid waste management
  • Waste generation variables
  • People’s attitudes
  • Stakeholder analysis
  • TOWS matrix