Advertisement

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 342–350 | Cite as

Nature and extent of unauthorized waste dump sites in and around Bangalore city

  • H. N. ChanakyaEmail author
  • Shwetmala
  • T. V. Ramachandra
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Bangalore city generates around 3600 tons/day of solid waste and a major constituent is organic (>70 %). The quantum of wastes generated is far greater than the capacity of the permitted waste treatment and disposal sites. As these sites are quite far-off, many of the trucks dump at unauthorized locations to reduce their transportation costs or meet their daily targets. To understand overall patterns, sources and reasons for dumping, an attempt is made to find the locations, composition and to assess the area of garbage spread at unauthorized dumps in and around the city. The field survey was conducted during August 2010 to April 2012 wherein the accuracy of three techniques (visual estimates, step measurement and Google Earth) was assessed to rapidly estimate area of garbage spread. The total number of unauthorized dumps located outside the core area was 393 and inside core area was 303. The results indicated that the visual estimates to determine the location and area of garbage spread were better in identifying locations of unauthorized dumps in a very short while and can be deployed to assess performance of various mega-cities in transition to good solid-waste management.

Keywords

Unauthorized dump site Waste Method Locations Area 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the participation and inputs of the 45 student volunteers from Christ University, St. Joseph’s College and MS Ramaiah Institute of Technology, Bangalore who carried out the survey in the first part of the study. We also thank Himanshu K., Sreesha M., Yashodha P.S. and Vidya H. for their contributions while conducting this survey. The financial support for this study was provided by the Bangalore City Corporation (Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike, BBMP) and is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Corbyn L (2008) Crackdown on illegal dumping. Handbook for local government, NSWGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tompson L, Chainey S (2011) Profiling illegal waste activity: using crime scripts as a data collection and analytical strategy. Eur J Crim Policy Res 17:179–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shekdar AV (2009) Sustainable solid waste management: an integrated approach for Asian countries. Waste Manag 29:1438–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chanakya HN, Swamy SGS (2011) Urban solid waste management status in Karnataka. Technical report CST-KSCST, IISc, Bangalore, pp 114–122Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chanakya HN, Shwetmala, Ramachandra TV (2011) Estimating unauthorized dumping of USW around cities—a case study of Bangalore. In: 2nd International conference on sustainable waste management, Kolkata, pp 636–642Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Erb TL, Philipson WR, Teng WL, Liang T (1981) Analysis of landfills with historic airphotos. PE&RS 47(9):1361–1369Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Philipson WR, Barnaba EM, Ingram A, Williams VL (1988) Landcover monitoring with SPOT for landfill investigations. PE&RS 54(2):223–228Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jones HK, Chidley TRE (1989) The application of low cost aerial video and photographic data to assess environmental impact caused by the migration of gas away from landfill sites. IGARSS 89, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing, Vancouver, pp 1674–1676Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Airola TM, Kosson DS (1989) Digital analysis of hazardous waste site aerial photographs. JWPCF 61(2):180–183Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barnaba PA, Philipson WR, Ingram AW, Pim J (1991) The use of aerial photographs in country inventories of waste-disposal sites. PE&RS 57(10):1289–1296Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brivio PA, Doria I, Zilioli E (1993) Aspects of spatial autocorrelation of Landsat TM data for the inventory of waste-disposal sites in rural environments. PE&RS 59(9):1377–1382Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen C, Chang C (2006) Monitoring of illegal dumping using spatial data mining and remote sensing. AARS 1–6Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yonezawa C (2009) Possibility of monitoring of waste disposal site using satellite imagery. JIFS 6:23–28Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lakshmikantha H (2006) Report on waste dump sites around Bangalore. Waste Manag 26:640–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chiemchaisri C, Chiemchaisri W, Salvaros O, Luknanulak N, Towprayoon S, Visvanathan C (2005) Comparison of different methods for determining methane emission from waste disposal sites in Thailand. Asian J Energ Environ 6(1):1–16Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chanakya HN, Sharatchandra HC (2005) GHG footprint of a developing country city Bangalore. ASTRA, IISc, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rajabapaiah P (1988) Energy from Bangalore garbage—a preliminary study. ASTRA, IISc, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    TIDE (Technology Informatics Design Endeavour) (2000) Energy recovery from municipal solid wastes in around Bangalore. Aus-Aid, TIDE, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baars JA, Dyson CB (1981) Visual estimates of available herbage on hill country sheep pastures. N Zeal J Exper Agric 9(2):157–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Waite RB (1994) The application of visual estimation procedures for monitoring pasture yield and composition in exclosures and small plots. Trop Grass 28:38–42Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mumby PJ, Edwards AJ, Green EP, Anderson CW, Ellis AC, Clark CD (1997) A visual assessments technique for estimating seagrass standing crop. Aqu Cons Mar Freshw Ecosyst 7:239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Palmer JF, Hoffman RE (2001) Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Lands Urban Plan 54:149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    O’Donovan M, Dillon P, Rath M, Stakelum G (2002) A comparison of four methods of herbage mass estimation. Irish J Agric Food Res 41:17–27Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    O’Donovan M, Connolly J, Dillon P, Rath M, Stakelum G (2002) Visual assessment of herbage mass. Irish J Agric Food Res 41(2):201–211Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tveit MS (2009) Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference; a comparison between groups. J Environ Manag 90:2882–2888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ode A, Tveit MS, Fry G (2010) Advantages of using different data sources in assessment of landscape change and its effect on visual scale. Ecol Indic 10:24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Datta P (2006) Urbanization in India. Regional and Sub-regional population dynamic population process in Urban areas European population conference, 21–24 June 2006Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Caughley G, Sinclair R, Scott-Kimmis D (1976) Experiments in aerial survey. J Wildl Manag 40:290–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Caughley G (1977) Analysis of vertebrate population. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Francis CM (1994) Population changes of boreal forest ducks—a comment. J Wildl Manag 58:582–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Keast A, Harker J (1977) Step counts as a means of determining densities and habitat utilization patterns in lake fishes. Environ Biol Fish 1:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Solazzi MF (1984) Relationship between visual counts of cohosalmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) from spawning fish surveys and the actual number of fish present. In: Symons PEK, Waldichuck M (eds), Workshop on stream indexing for salmon escapement estimation. Can Fish Aquat Sci Tech Rep 1326:175–186Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Winward AH (2000) Monitoring the vegetation resources in Riparian areas. RMRS-GTR-47, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forest Service, USDAGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4(1):9Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Reddy BVV (2009) Sustainable materials for low carbon buildings. Int J Low Carbon Technol 175–181Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stockdale CR (1998) Evaluation of techniques for estimating the yield of irrigated pastures intensively grazed by dairy cows. Aust J Exp Agric 24:300–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Sustainable TechnologiesIIScBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Centre for Infrastructure, Urban Planning and Sustainable TransportIIScBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations