Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mercury flows in a zinc smelting facility in South Korea

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To prepare for the international mercury convention, the characteristics of mercury emissions from a zinc smelting facility in South Korea have been reviewed and a material flow analysis (MFA) has been conducted in this research. As inputs into the mercury MFA study, zinc ores and sulfuric acid were examined, whereas wastewater sludge, effluence water, spent catalyst, and emissions from the casting and roasting processes were examined as outputs. Mercury concentrations extracted from end products like zinc ingots, cadmium ingots, and sulfuric acid were then analyzed. Our results showed that the wastewater sludge discharged from the zinc smelting process had a relatively higher concentration of mercury, indicating that the concentration of mercury was further enriched in the wastewater sludge. The wastes discharged through the zinc smelting process should be thoroughly controlled, as results of the MFA showed that approximately 89 % of the mercury contained in the original input was later found in the waste. According to this study, the higher the concentration of mercury within zinc ores at the input stage, the higher is the mercury concentration found in the wastewater sludge at the output stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Merck Index. https://www.rsc.org/merck-index. Accessed 15 March 2014

  2. Feng X, Qiu G (2008) Mercury pollution in Guizhou, Southwestern China—an overview. Sci Total Environ 400:227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. NIER 4 (2014) Website. http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0073.htm. Accessed 25 on January 2014

  4. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (2006) Development of analytical methods for organomercury and studies of field applications in the environment (I), No. 2006-45-827 (in Korean)

  5. UNEP (2008) Technical background report to the global atmospheric mercury assessment. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme / UNEP Chemical Branch

  6. UNEP (2011) Chemicals management, including mercury. In: Twenty-sixth session of the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum (UNEP/GC.26/5/Rev.1), Nairobi, 21–24 Feb 2011

  7. UNEP (2013) Report of the intergovernmental negotiating committee to prepare a global legally binding instrument on mercury, Fifth session, Geneva, 13–18 Jan 2013 (UNEP (DTIE)/Hg/INC.5/7). http://www.unep.org/chemicalsandwaste/Portals/9/Mercury/Documents/INC5/5_1_agenda.pdf

  8. UNEP (2013) Global mercury assessment 2013, sources, emissions, releases and environmental transport. UNEP Chemicals Branch, Geneva, Switzerland

  9. Wang S, Song J, Li G, Wu Y, Zhang L, Wan Q, Streets D, Chin K, Hao J (2010) Estimating mercury emissions from a zinc smelter in relation to China’s mercury control policies. Environ Pollut 158:3347–3353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zheng N, Wang Q, Zheng D (2007) Health risk of Hg, Pb, Cd, Zn, and Cu to the inhabitants around Huludao zinc plant in China via consumption of vegetables. Sci Total Environ 383:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zheng N, Liu J, Wang Q, Liang Z (2011) Mercury contamination due to zinc smelting and chlor-alkali production in NE China. Appl Geochem 26:188–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li G, Feng X, Qiu G, Bi X, Li Z, Zhang C, Wang D, Shang L, Guo Y (2008) Environmental mercury contamination of an artisanal zinc smelting area in Weining County, Guizhou, China. Environ Pollut 154:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu Y, Wang S, Streets D, Hao J, Chan M, Jiang J (2006) Trends in anthropogenic mercury emissions in China from 1995 to 2003. Environ Sci Technol 40(17):5312–5318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Streets D, Hao J, Wu Y, Jiang J, Chan M, Tian H, Feng X (2005) Anthropogenic mercury emissions in China. Atmos Environ 39:7789–7806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumari R (2011) Preliminary mercury emission estimates from non-ferrous metal smelting in India. Atmos Pollut Res 2:513–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu QR, Wang SX, Zhang L, Song JX, Yang H, Meng Y (2012) Update of mercury emissions from China’s primary zinc, lead and copper smelters, 2000–2010. Atmos Chem Phys 12:11153–11163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang L, Wang S, Wu Q, Meng Y, Yang H, Wang F, Hao J (2012) Were mercury emission factors for Chinese non-ferrous metal smelters overestimated? Evidence from onsite measurements in six smelters. Environ Poll 171:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Feng X, Li G, Qiu G (2004) A preliminary study on mercury contamination to the environment from artisanal zinc smelting using indigenous methods in Hezhang county, Guizhou, China. Part 1: mercury emission from zinc smelting and its influences on the surface waters. Atmos Environ 38:6223–6230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (2010) A study on mercury transport and fate in the environment (II), NEIR NO. 2010-83-1258 (in Korean)

  20. Brunner PH, Rechberger H (2004) Practical hand book of material flow analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bringezu S, Fischer-Kowalski M, Kleijn R, Palm V (1997) Regional and national material flow accounting: from paradigm to practice of sustainability. Proceedings of the ConAccount workshop 21–23 January, 1997, Leiden, The Netherlands

  22. Fischer-Kowalski M, Krausmann F, Giljum S, Lutter S, Mayer A, Bringezu S, Moriguchi Y, Schütz H, Schandl H, Weisz H (2001) Methodology and indicators of economy wide material flow accounting. State of the art and reliability across sources. J Ind Ecol 15:855–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hong S, Choi Y, Kim K, Kang J, Oh G, Hur T (2011) Material flow analysis of paper in Korea. Part 1. Data calculation model from the flow relationships between paper products. Res Con Recycl 55:1206–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jang ES, Kim KH, Hwang YY, Hur T (2011) Substance flow analysis of mercury and human risk assessment (Korean). Korean J Life Cycle Assess 12:66–80

    Google Scholar 

  25. Park J, Lee S, Kim H, Song D, Kim M, Kim M, Kim Y, Lee S (2010) Emission characteristics of mercury in Zn smelting process. J Korean Soc Atmos Environ 26(5):507–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (2009) A study on mercury transport and fate in the environment (I), NEIR NO. 2009-22-764 (in Korean)

  27. Ministry of Environment (2014) Korea standard waste test methods, ES06130.a, pp 19–26 (in Korean)

  28. Ministry of Environment (2014) Korea official test method on air pollution, 2014–9, ES04108.1 (in Korean)

  29. US EPA Method 29 (2014) Determination of Metal Emissions from Stationary Sources. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/promgate/m-29.pdf. Accessed 15 on January 2015

  30. ASTM International (2006) ASTM D 1193-06, Standard specification for reagent water, 2nd edn. ASTM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  31. Clevenger WL, Smith BW, Winefordner JD (1997) Trace determination of mercury: a review. Crit Rev Anal Chem 27:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hight SC, Cheng J (2005) Determination of total mercury in seafood by cold vapor-atomic absorption spectroscopy after microwave decomposition. Food Chem 91:557–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mercader TF, Rodríguez S, Gyves J (2005) CVAAS determination of naturally occurring levels of mercury in sediments after on-line preconcentration with a sol–gel sorbent doped with CYANEX-301. J Anal At Spectrom 20:1212–1217. doi:10.1039/B505000F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jarzynska G, Falandysz J (2011) The determination of mercury in mushrooms by CV-AAS and ICP-AES techniques. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 46(6):569–573. doi:10.1080/10934529.2011.562816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zavvar MH, Asghari A, Shirkhanloo H (2010) Determination of Hg in water and wastewater samples by CV-AAS following on-line preconcentration with silver trap. J Anal Chem 65(9):935–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ministry of Environment (2014) Korea standard method for waste, ES06404.1, pp 243–253 (in Korean)

  37. US EPA (2005) Mercury in solids and solutions by thermal decomposition amalgamation and atomic absorption spectrophotometry, SW-846 Method 747. http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/7473.pdf

  38. Voegborlo RB, Akagi H (2007) Determination of mercury in fish by cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry using an automatic mercury analyzer. Food Chem 100:853–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Azanu D, Acheampong MA, Woode MY (2014) Heavy metals and organochlorine pesticides residue levels in natural spices sold in Kumasi, Ghana. Int J Environ Sci Toxic Res 2(6):130–135 ISSN: 2408–7262

    Google Scholar 

  40. Poissant L, Pilote M, Yumvihoze E, Lean D (2008) Mercury concentrations and foliage/atmosphere fluxes in a maple forest ecosystem in Québec, Canada. J Geophys Res Atmos (1984–2012) 113(D10):27

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junbeum Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chung, D., Choi, HH., Yoo, HY. et al. Mercury flows in a zinc smelting facility in South Korea. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19, 46–54 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-015-0381-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-015-0381-z

Keywords

Navigation