Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 177–185 | Cite as

Selection of management option for solid waste from olive oil industry using the analytical hierarchy process

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

This paper considers the process of selecting a appropriate olive mill solid waste management option in Jordan. Six alternatives were found to be possible options for olive mill solid waste management. Those alternatives are: animal feed, energy recovery, extraction of useful materials, co-combustion, fertilizers, and disposal without treatment. Prioritization of these six alternatives was performed through the analytical hierarchy process. Management options were prioritized based on three criteria: environmental effects, economical benefits, and the technology involved. Priorities given to each of criteria were evaluated through soliciting experts and olive mills owners opinions. Analytical hierarchy process model results revealed that co-combustion option is most favorable followed by the animal feed alternative and lease favorable is disposal without treatment. Sensitivity of the proposed analytical hierarchy process model was addressed as the priorities may change. Model sensitivity analysis showed that our model decision is robust to moderate changes in priorities. Unless the environmental criteria given a very high priority, co-combustion remains as the most favorable management option.

Keywords

Analytical hierarchy process Olive mill solid waste Decision support system 

References

  1. 1.
    Niaounakis M, Halvadakis CP (2006) Olive processing waste management: literature review and patent survey, 2nd edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Website: http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/home/E. Accessed 15 Oct 2014
  3. 3.
    Alvarado CA (1998) Environmental performance in the olive oil industry: comparing technologies using environmental performance indicators. M.Sc. Thesis in Environmental Management and Policy, Lund UniversityGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vlyssides AG, Loizidou M, Gimouhopoulos K, Zorpas A (1998) Olive oil processing wastes production and their characteristics in relation to olive oil extraction methods. Fresenius Environ Bull 7(5):308–313Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vlyssides AG, Bouranis DL, Loizidou M, Karvouni G (1996) Study of a demonstration plant for the co-composting of olive-oil-processing wastewater and solid residue. Bioresour Technol 56(2):187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garca-Ibanez P, Cabanillas A, Sanchez JM (2004) Gasification of leached orujillo (olive oil waste) in a pilot plant circulating fluidised bed reactor. Preliminary results. Biomass Bioenergy 27(2):183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jordanian Ministry of Agriculture. Website: http://www.moa.gov.jo/ar-jo/reports.aspx. Accessed 17 Sept 2013
  8. 8.
    Taha HA (2011) Operations research: an introduction, 9th edn. Pearson, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vaidya OS, Kumar S (2006) Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur J Oper Res 169:1–29MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abu-Qdais HA (2010) Selection of landfill leachate management strategy using decision support system. J Solid Waste Technol Manage 36(4):246–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Madadian E, Amiri L, Abdoli MA (2013) Application of analytic hierarchy process and multicriteria decision analysis on waste management: a case study in Iran. Environ Prog Sustainable Energy 32:810–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Samah MAA, Manaf LA, Aris AZ, Sulaiman WNA (2011) Solid waste management: analytical hierarchy process (AHP) application of selecting treatment technology in Sepang Municipal Council, Malaysia. Curr World Environ 6:1–16Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sener S, Sener E, Karagüzel R (2011) Solid waste disposal site selection with GIS and AHP methodology: a case study in Senirkent-Uluborlu (Isparta) Basin, Turkey. Environ Monitor Assess 173(1–4):533–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hadjipanayiotou M, Koumas A (1996) Performance of sheep and goats on olive cake silages. In: Technical Bulletin-Agricultural Research Institute, vol 176. Nicosia, Cyprus, pp 3–10Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zumbo A, Chiofalo V, Lanza M, Dugo P (2001) Effects of vitamin E in lambs fed olive cake. Chemical composition of meat and lipid oxidation. In: Proceedings of the ASPA Congress-Recent Progress in Animal Production Science (vol 2)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abu- Qdais M (1996) Fluidized-bed combustion for energy production from olive cake. Energy 21(3):173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Di Blasi C, Signorelli G, Portoricco G (1999) Countercurrent fixed-bed gasification of biomass at laboratory scale. Ind Eng Chem Res 38(7):2571–2581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Di Blasi C, Buonanno F, Branca C (1999) Reactivities of some biomass chars in air. Carbon 37(8):1227–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tekin AR, Dalgic AC (2000) Biogas production from olive pomace. Resour Conserv Recycl 30(4):301–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cardoso SM, Coimbra MA, Lopes da Silva JA (2003) Calcium-mediated gelation of an olive pomace pectic extract. Carbohydr Polym 52(2):125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jones N, Duarte E, Silva MJ (1998) The use of two-phase olive oil bagasse as organic amendment: an environmental prevention strategy. Environ Eng Ser 3:241–249Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lopez MJ, Ramos-Cormenzana A (1996) Xanthan production from olive-mill wastewaters. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 38(3):263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Papafotiou M, Phsyhalou M, Kargas G, Chatzipavlidis I, Chronopoulos J (2004) Olive-mill wastes compost as growing medium component for the production of poinsettia. Sci Hortic 102(2):167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Owen RW, Mier W, Giacosa A, Hull WE, Spiegelhalder B, Bartsch H (2000) Phenolic compounds and squalene in olive oils: the concentration and antioxidant potential of total phenols, simple phenols, secoiridoids, lignansand squalene. Food Chem Toxicol 38(8):647–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Atimtay AT, Topal H (2004) Co-combustion of olive cake with lignite coal in a circulating fluidized bed. Fuel 83(7):859–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khraisha YH, Hamdan MA, Qalalweh HS (1999) Direct combustion of olive cake using fluidized bed combustor. Energy Sources 21(4):319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bouranis DL, Vlyssides AG, Drossopoulos JB, Karvouni G (1995) Some characteristics of a new organic soil conditioner from the co-composting of olive oil processing wastewater and solid residue. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 26(15–16):2461–2472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Saaty Thomas L, Vargas Luis G (2006) Decision making with the analytic network process: economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil Engineering DepartmentJordan University of Science and TechnologyIrbidJordan
  2. 2.Industrial Engineering DepartmentJordan University of Science and TechnologyIrbidJordan

Personalised recommendations