Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Aluminium flows in vehicles: enhancing the recovery at end-of-life

  • SPECIAL FEATURE: ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • End-of-Life Vehicle (ELV) Recycling
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transportation sector constitutes the major end-use market for aluminium-containing products and expectations for the future do indicate that aluminium will increase at 140 kg per vehicle. Moreover, up to 75 % aluminium recycled in Europe is used in transportation: thus, metal scrap recovered from ELVs is a key lever to act for closing material cycles. However, although the management chain of ELVs has an established procedure and aluminium scrap is usually recovered in shredding plants, a considerable fraction of the metal particles ends up in the light fraction called car fluff and is then landfilled. In this study we investigated potential of enhancing the recovery of aluminium scrap from the light fluff treatment. With this goal, the quantity of aluminium embedded in the Italian transport sector in the last 62 years was estimated, and a campaign of characterization in size and shape distribution of aluminium particles in the light fluff output has been carried out. The results estimated up to about 560,000 tons of metal are potentially recoverable from the treatment of light fluff at current operating conditions, but relevant improvements may be achieve when size and shape distribution criteria are adopt to implement eddy currents separation for a quantitative metal recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim HJ, Keoleian GA, Skerlos SJ (2011) Economic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions reduction by vehicle lightweighting using aluminum and high-strength steel. J Ind Ecol 15(1):64–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ungureanu CA, Das S, Jawahir IS (2007) Life-cycle cost analysis: aluminum versus steel in passenger cars; TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society)

  3. Boon JE, Isaacs JA, Gupta SM (2000) Economic impact of aluminium-intensive vehicles on the U.S. automotive recycling infrastructure. J. Ind Ecol 4:117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ayres RU, Ayres LW (2002) A handbook of industrial ecology. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  5. Field FR, Ehrenfeld JR, Roos D, Clark JP (1994) Automobile recycling policy: findings and recommendations Davos. International Motor Vehicle Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  6. European Aluminium Association (EAA), Aluminium in cars Report 2007, pp 1–20

  7. Passarini F, Ciacci L, Santini A, Vassura I, Morselli L (2012) Auto shredder residue LCA: implications of ASR composition evolution. J Clean Prod 23:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dalmijn WL, De Jong TPR (2007) The development of vehicle recycling in Europe: sorting, shredding, and separation. JOM-US 59:52–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ecofer, Dichiarazione Ambientale (2010), pp 1–68

  10. Gesing JA (2005) Aluminium, recycling and transportation, presentation at aluminium. International conference held 12–14 Oct, Kliczkow Castle, Poland

  11. Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 18 September 2000 on end-of life vehicles e Commission Statements. OJ L 269, 21.10.2000, pp. 34

  12. Osada M, Tanigaki N, Takahashi S, Sakai S (2008) Brominated flame retardants and heavy metals in automobile shredder residue (ASR) and their behavior in the melting process. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 10(2):93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ciacci L, Morselli L, Passarini F, Santini A, Vassura I (2010) A comparison among different Automotive Shredder Residue treatment processes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:896–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Santini A, Morselli L, Passarini F, Vassura I, Di Carlo S, Bonino F (2011) End-of-Life Vehicles management: Italian material and energy recovery efficiency. Waste Manage (Oxford) 31:489–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Directive 1999/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste. OJ L 182/1, 16.7.1999, pp. 19

  16. D.Lgs. 36/2003, Attuazione della direttiva 1999/31/CE relative alle discariche di rifiuti. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 59 del 12-3-2003—Suppl. Ordinario n. 40. (In Italian)

  17. Staudinger J, Keoleian GA (2001) Management of end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) in the US; CSS01-01, pp 1–67

  18. Commission of the European Communities Report (COM Report) from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the targets contained in article 7(2)(b) of Directive 2000/53/EC on End-of-Life Vehicle e Impact Assessment. Brussels 16.01.2007, SEC 2007, p 14

  19. Graedel TE (2011) The prospects for urban mining, the bridge, Spring, N.W., Washington, 41(1):43–50

  20. Brunner PH, Rechberger H (2004) Practical handbook of material flow analysis Lewis Publisher, USA

  21. Kapur A, Bertram M, Spatari S, Fuse K, Graedel TE (2003) The contemporary copper cycle of Asia. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 5(2):143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang C-L, Vause J, Ma H-W, Yu C-P (2012) Using material/substance flow analysis to support sustainable development assessment: a literature review and outlook. Resour Conserv Recycl 68:104–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fuse M, Nakajima K, Yagita H (2007) Outflow of resources from Japan focusing on end-of-life vehicles. Mater Trans 48(9):2436–2444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. International Aluminium Association (IAI), In http://www.world aluminium.org/Home (Accessed May 2012)

  25. Chen W, Shi L, Qian Y (2010) Substance flow analysis of aluminium in mainland China for 2001, 2004 and 2007: exploiting its initial sources, eventual sinks and the patways linking them Resources. Conserv Recycl 54:557–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. European Aluminium Association & Organisation of Aluminium Refiners and Remelters (EAA-OEA), Aluminium Recycling in Europe—The Road to High Quality Products; 2008; pp 1–51

  27. Gaustad G, Olivetti E, Kirchain R (2012) Improving aluminum recycling: a survey of sorting and impurity removal technologies. Resour Conserv Recycl 58:79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Morselli L, Santini A, Passarini F, Vassura I (2010) Automotive shredder residue (ASR) characterization for a valuable management. Waste Manage (Oxford) 30:2228–2234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fiore S, Ruffino B, Zanetti MC (2012) Automobile shredder residues in Italy: characterization and valorization opportunities. Waste Manage (Oxford) 32:1548–1559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ciacci L, Chen W, Passarini F, Eckelman M, Vassura I, Morselli L (2013) Historical evolution of anthropogenic aluminum flows and stocks in Italy. Resour Conserv Recycl 72:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu G, Bangs CE, Mueller DB (2011) Unearthing Potentials for Decarbonizing the U.S. Aluminum Cycle. Environ Sci Technol 45:9515–9522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Amicarelli V, Lagioia G, De Marco O (2004) Aluminium industrial metabolism, a commodity science contribution. In: Forum Ware International 1 pp. 11

  33. Zhang S, Forssberg E, Arvidson B, Moss W (1999) Separation mechanisms and criteria of a rotating eddy-current separator operation. Resour Conserv Recycl 25:215–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Settimo F, Bevilacqua P, Rem P (2004) Eddy current separation of fine non-ferrous particles from bulk streams. Phys Sep Sci Eng 13(1):15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Coates G, Rahimifard S (2009) Modelling of post-fragmentation waste stream processing within UK shredder facilities. Waste Manage (Oxford) 29:44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee MJ, Rahimifard S (2012) A novel separation process for recycling of post-consumer products. CIRP Annu Manuf Technol 61:35–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Morselli L, Santini A, Passarini F, Vassura I, Ciacci L (2011) LCM applied to Auto Shredder Residue (ASR). In: Herrmann C, Hesselbach J (eds) Glocalized solutions for sustainability in manufacturing. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp 96–99

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Ferrão P, Nazareth P, Amaral J (2006) Strategies for meeting EU end-of-life vehicles reuse/recovery targets. J Ind Ecol 10(4):77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Aluminum Transportation Group (ATG)—Worldwide (2009) Update on aluminum content in North American light vehicles—Phase I; 2008; pp 1–103. Available at http://www.aluminumintransportation.org/ (Accessed May 2012)

Download references

Acknowledgments

We express gratitude to Gruppo Fiori for the technical and financial support to the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio Passarini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Passarini, F., Ciacci, L., Santini, A. et al. Aluminium flows in vehicles: enhancing the recovery at end-of-life. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 16, 39–45 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-013-0175-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-013-0175-0

Keywords

Navigation