Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of operational parameters in thermophilic acid fermentation of kitchen waste

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the effect of operational parameters, such as solids retention time (SRT), pH, and substrate total solids (TS) concentration, on acid fermentation efficiency was investigated. From batch tests, it was shown that the appropriate pH range for thermophilic acidogens was around 6–7 and that the optimum pH condition was 6. From the continuous experiment, pH and SRT were shown to be the most important operational parameters for solubilization and organic acid production. In contrast, TS concentration did not show any obvious effect on chromium chemical oxygen demand (CODcr) solubilization when TS was in the range 3.5%–10%. The optimum operational conditions for thermophilic acid fermentation were an SRT of 2 days and a pH of 6.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Imai F, Ukita M, Sekine M, Fukagawa M, Nakanishi H (2000) Fact-finding survey of actual garbage discharged from a dormitory and its biological anaerobic-aerobic treatment. Wat Sci Tech 36:129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hansen K, Angelidaki I, Ahring B (1999) Improving thermophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure. Wat Res 33:1805–1810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schaub SM, Leonard JJ (1996) Composting: an alternative waste management option for food processing industries. Trends Food Sci Technol 7(8):263–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Borup MB, Muchmore DR (1992) Food-processing waste. Wat Environ Res 64(4):413–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shin HS, Han SK, Song YC, Lee CY (2001) Food waste treatment using the MUSTAC process. Journal of Korea Society of Waste Management 18:43–50

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li YY, Ko IB, Noike T, Funami K, Sasaki H (2004) Comparison of ammonia inhibition between the mesophilic and thermoph ilic anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste. In: Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of Anaerobic Digestion. Serge R. Guiot (Congress Chair), Montreal, pp 507–510

  7. Lay JJ, Li YY. Noike T (1997) Influence of pH and moisture content on the methane production in high-solids sludge digestion. Wat Res 31(6):1518–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang T, Noike T (1991) Comparison of one-phase and two-phase anaerobic digestion in characteristics of substrate degradation and bacterial population level. Wat Sci Tech 23:1157–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yilmazer G, Yenigün O (1999) Two-phase anaerobic treatment of cheese whey. Wat Sci Tech 40:289–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ren N, Wang B, Huang JC (1997) Ethanol-type fermentation from carbohydrate in a high-rate acidogenic reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 54(5):428–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu HQ, Fang HHP (2003) Acidogenesis of gelatin-rich wastewater in an upflow anaerobic reactor: influence of pH and temperature. Wat Res 37(1):55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guerrero L, Omil F, Méndez R, Lema JM (1999) Anaerobic hydrolysis and acidogenesis of wastewaters from food industries with high content of organic solids and protein. Wat Res 33(15):3281–3290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Veeken A, Hamelers B (1999) Effect of temperature on hydrolysis rate of selected biowaste components. Biores Technol 69:249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bitton G (1994) Wastewater microbiology. Wiley-Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yang K, Yu Y, Hwang S (2003) Selective optimization in thermophilic acidogenesis of cheese-whey wastewater to acetic and butyric acids: partial acidification and methanation. Wat Res 37:2467–2477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krugel S, Nemeth L, Peddle C (1998) Extended thermophilic anaerobic digestion for producing Class A biosolids at the Greater Vancouver Regional District’s Annacis Island wastewater treatment plant. Wat Sci Technol 38:409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanigawa N, Takemoto T, Ohki H, Kawasaki T (1997) Detailed components of garbage. J Jpn Waste Manag Assoc 50(217):116–119

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hong F, Tsuno H, Hidaka T, Cheon J (2003) Study on applicability and operation factor of thermophilic methane fermentation to garbage treatment in high concentration under once-a-day feeding condition. Environ Eng Res 40:333–341

    Google Scholar 

  19. APHA, AWWA, WEF (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. Americal Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dubois M, Gilles K, Hamilton J, Robert P, Smith F (1950) Colorimetric method for determination of sugar and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lowry O, Rosebrough N, Farr A, Randall R (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275

    Google Scholar 

  22. Noike T, Takabata H, Mizuno O, Ohba M (2002) Inhibition of hydrogen fermentation of organic wastes by lactic acid bacteria. J Hydrogen Energy 27:1367–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taira Hidaka.

Additional information

This research was carried as a part of the CREST project of Japan Science and Technology Agency.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, YJ., Tsuno, H., Hidaka, T. et al. Evaluation of operational parameters in thermophilic acid fermentation of kitchen waste. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 10, 46–52 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-007-0184-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-007-0184-y

Key words

Navigation