Skip to main content
Log in

Cochlear Aqueduct Post-Natal Growth: A Computed Tomography Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cochlear aqueduct (CA) is a bony canal located at the base of the scala tympani of the cochlea. It connects the inner ear perilymph fluid to the cerebrospinal fluid of the posterior cerebral fossa. Its function is not well understood, as it seems to be patent in only a fraction of adult patients. Indirect observations argue in favor of the CA being more patent in children. To study the CA morphology in children, we performed a retrospective single-center study of 85 high-resolution temporal bone computed tomography (hrCT) scans of children with a mean age of 3.23 ± 3.07 years (13 days of life up to 18 years), and compared them with a group of 22 adult hrCT (mean age of 24.01 ± 3.58 years). The CA morphology measurements included its total length, its funnel (wider intracranial portion) length and width and its type (indicating its radiological patency), according to a previously published classification. The dimensions of the CA were significantly smaller in children compared with adults for the axial length (10.37 ± 2.58 versus 14.63 ± 2.40 mm, respectively, p < 0,001) and the funnel length (3.94 ± 1.59 versus 6.01 ± 1.77 mm, respectively, p < 0,001). The funnel width tended to be smaller but the difference was not significant: 3.49 ± 1,33 versus 3.89 ± 1.07 mm, p = 0,22. The repartition of types of CA was also statistically different. The CA appeared to be more identifiable in the children population. Type 1 (CA visible along its entire course) accounted for 42% (36/85) of children and only 5% (1/22) of adults, type 2 (visible in the medial two thirds) for 30% (25/85) versus 31% (7/22), type 3 (not visible completely along the medial two thirds) for 27% (23/85) versus 50% (11/22). Finally, type 4 (undetectable) was found in only 1% (1/85) of children and 14% (3/22) of adults (p < 0,001). Our study showed significant postnatal growth of the length of the CA, which was more rapid before the age of 2, and slowed after 6 years of age. Its width increased less, with children older than 2 years presenting a similar width to adults. The CA was more identifiable in hrCT in children, arguing for a more permeable tract. The number of completely ossified CA was significantly lower in the children population. These findings highlight the differences between the CA morphology in adults and children and raise the question of differences in function. Moreover, these differences may impact the pharmacodynamics of drugs or vectors delivered into the pediatric inner ear. Further studies are required, both on the anatomy of temporal bones and on the function of the CA in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information, and individual data are represented as single dots in the figures.

References

  1. Muren C, Wilbrand H (1986) Anatomic Variations of the Human Cochlear Aqueduct: A Radioanatomic Investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 27:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/028418518602700103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ritter FN, Lawrence M (1965) A histological and experimental study of cochlear aqueduct patency in the adult human. Laryngoscope 75:1224–1233. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-196508000-00002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Palva T, Dammert K (1969) Human cochlear aqueduct. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) Suppl 246:1+

  4. Gopen Q, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN (1997) Anatomy of the normal human cochlear aqueduct with functional implications. Hear Res 107:9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5955(97)00017-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thalen E, Wit H, Segenhout H, Albers F (2002) Inner ear pressure changes following square wave intracranial or ear canal pressure manipulation in the same guinea pig. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 259:174–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-001-0431-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ciuman RR (2009) Communication routes between intracranial spaces and inner ear: function, pathophysiologic importance and relations with inner ear diseases. Am J Otolaryngol 30:193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2008.04.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marques SR, Bonaldi LV, De Angelis MA, Isotani S, Smith RL (2001) The External Opening of the Cochlear Aqueduct in Infants and Adults. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Nova 11:298–301. https://doi.org/10.1159/000068295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Engert J, Bauer D, Spahn B, Müller-Graff F-T, Voelker J, Neun T et al (2023) Computed tomographic 3D analysis of the cochlear aqueduct—potential and limitations of clinical imaging. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 143:931–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2023.2294921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhimani S, Virapongse C, Sarwar M (1984) High-resolution computed tomographic appearance of normal cochlear aqueduct. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 5:715–720

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jackler RK, Hwang PH (1993) Enlargement of the cochlear aqueduct: Fact or fiction? Otolaryngol Neck Surg 109:14–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459989310900104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tekdemir I, Aslan A, Ersoy M, Karahan ST, Tellioglu C (2000) A Radiologico-Anatomical Comparative Study of the Cochlear Aqueduct. Clin Radiol 55:288–291. https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.1999.0371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Krombach GA, Van Den Boom M, Di Martino E, Schmitz-Rode T, Westhofen M, Prescher A et al (2005) Computed tomography of the inner ear: Size of anatomical structures in the normal temporal bone and in the temporal bone of patients with menière’s disease. Eur Radiol 15:1505–1513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2750-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Palva T (1970) Cochlear aqueduct in infants. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 70(2):83–94. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016487009181863

  14. Bachor E, Byahatti S, Karmody CS (1997) The cochlear aqueduct in pediatric temporal bones. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 254:S34–S38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02439718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagururu NV, Jung D, Hui F, Pearl MS, Carey JP, Ward BK (2023) Cochlear Aqueduct Morphology in Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome. Audiol Res 13:367–377. https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13030032

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Migirov L, Kronenberg J (2005) Radiology of the Cochlear Aqueduct. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 114:863–866. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940511401110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spoor F, Zonneveld F (1995) Morphometry of the primate bony labyrinth: a new method based on high-resolution computed tomography. J Anat 186(Pt 2):271–286

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Spoor F, Jeffery N, Zonneveld F (2000) Using diagnostic radiology in human evolutionary studies. J Anat 197(Pt 1):61–76. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19710061.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mejdoubi M, Dedouit F, Mokrane F-Z, Telmon N (2016) CT scan imaging of the human fetal labyrinth: case series data throughout gestation. Otol Neurotol 37(5):602–607

  20. Blanc F, Bemelmans A-P, Affortit C, Joséphine C, Puel J-L, Mondain M et al (2022) A Single Cisterna Magna Injection of AAV Leads to Binaural Transduction in Mice. Front Cell Dev Biol 9:783504. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.783504

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mathiesen BK, Miyakoshi LM, Cederroth CR, Tserga E, Versteegh C, Bork PAR, et al (2023) Delivery of gene therapy through a cerebrospinal fluid conduit to rescue hearing in adult mice. Sci Transl Med 15:eabq3916. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abq3916

  22. Ranum PT, Tecedor L, Keiser MS, Chen YH, Leib DE, Liu X et al (2023) Cochlear transduction via cerebrospinal fluid delivery of AAV in non-human primates. Mol Ther 31:609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.12.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Talaei S, Schnee ME, Aaron KA, Ricci AJ (2019) Dye Tracking Following Posterior Semicircular Canal or Round Window Membrane Injections Suggests a Role for the Cochlea Aqueduct in Modulating Distribution. Front Cell Neurosci 13:471. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Nishimura S, Yanagita N, Inafuku S, Handoh M, Yokoi H, Futatsugi Y et al (1981) A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study of the Guinea Pig Cochlear Aqueduct. ORL 43:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1159/000275529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hofman R, Segenhout JM, Albers FWJ, Wit HP (2005) The relationship of the round window membrane to the cochlear aqueduct shown in three-dimensional imaging. Hear Res 209:19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2005.06.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Akil O, Dyka F, Calvet C, Emptoz A, Lahlou G, Nouaille S et al (2019) Dual AAV-mediated gene therapy restores hearing in a DFNB9 mouse model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817537116

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao X, Liu H, Liu H, Cai R, Wu H (2022) Gene Therapy Restores Auditory Functions in an Adult Vglut3 Knockout Mouse Model. Hum Gene Ther 33:729–739. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2022.062

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Alwan M, Hurtado G (2022) Sensorineural hearing loss following lumbar puncture, spinal anaesthesia or epidural anaesthesia: a case series and literature review. J Laryngol Otol 136:271–278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215122000226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Maha Abbas managed data curation, formal analysis, validation, investigation, visualization, methodology, and the review and editing process. Jing Wang has been pivotal in the methodology, supervision, and has been instrumental in drafting the original manuscript as well as in the subsequent administration and editorial processes. Nicolas Leboucq managed data curation and methodology. Michel Mondain has been pivotal in the conceptualization and methodology of the project. Fabian Blanc has led the project, contributing to the conceptual framework, visualization, methodology, supervision, and has been instrumental in drafting the original manuscript as well as in the subsequent administration and editorial processes.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabian Blanc.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests, financial or personal influences, related to this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1 (PDF 151 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbas, M., Wang, J., Leboucq, N. et al. Cochlear Aqueduct Post-Natal Growth: A Computed Tomography Study. JARO (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-024-00963-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-024-00963-0

Keywords

Navigation