Skip to main content
Log in

Identifying the Origin of Effects of Contralateral Noise on Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Unanesthetized Mice

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Descending neural pathways in the mammalian auditory system are known to modulate the function of the peripheral auditory system. These pathways include the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent innervation to outer hair cells (OHCs) and the acoustic reflex pathways mediating middle ear muscle (MEM) contractions. Based on measurements in humans (Marks and Siegel, companion paper), we applied a sensitive method to attempt to differentiate MEM and MOC reflexes using contralateral acoustic stimulation in mice under different levels of anesthesia. Separation of these effects is based on the knowledge that OHC-generated transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) are delayed relative to the stimulus, and that the MOC reflex affects the emission through its innervation of OHC. In contrast, the MEM-mediated changes in middle ear reflectance alter both the stimulus (with a short delay) and the emission. Using this approach, time averages to transient stimuli were evaluated to determine if thresholds for a contralateral effect on the delayed emission, indicating potential MOC activation, could be observed in the absence of a change in the stimulus pressure. This outcome was not observed in the majority of cases. There were also no statistically significant differences between MEM and putative MOC thresholds, and variability was high for both thresholds regardless of anesthesia level. Since the two reflex pathways could not be differentiated on the basis of activation thresholds, it was concluded that the MEM reflex dominates changes in TEOAEs induced by contralateral noise. This result complicates the identification of purely MOC-induced changes on OAEs in mice unless the MEM reflex is inactivated surgically or pharmacologically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

FIG. 1
FIG. 2
FIG. 3
FIG. 4
FIG. 5
FIG. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boothalingam S, Purcell DW (2015) Influence of the stimulus presentation rate on medial olivocochlear system assays. JAcoust Soc Am 137:724–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg E (1973) On the neuronal organization of the acoustic middle ear reflex. A physiological and anatomical study. Brain Res 49:101–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borg E, Moller AR (1975) Effect of central depressants on the acoustic middle ear reflex in rabbit. A method for quantitative measurements of drug effect on the CNS. Acta Physiol Scand 94:327–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyev KP, Liberman MC, Brown MC (2002) Effects of anesthesia on efferent-mediated adaptation of the DPOAE. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol: JARO 3:362–373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cederholm JM, Froud KE, Wong AC, Ko M, Ryan AF, Housley GD (2012) Differential actions of isoflurane and ketamine-based anaesthetics on cochlear function in the mouse. Hear Res 292:71–79

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers AR, Hancock KE, Maison SF, Liberman MC, Polley DB (2012) Sound-evoked olivocochlear activation in unanesthetized mice. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol: JARO 13:209–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chung Y, Hancock KE, Nam SI, Delgutte B (2014) Coding of electric pulse trains presented through cochlear implants in the auditory midbrain of awake rabbit: comparison with anesthetized preparations. J Neurosci. Off J Soc Neurosci 34:218–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collet L, Kemp DT, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A, Morgon A (1990) Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 43:251–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JC, Moretti NA, Blumenthal TD (2007) Impact of stimulus signal-to-noise ratio on prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle. Psychophysiology 44:339–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman SS, Keefe DH (2006) Simultaneous measurement of noise-activated middle-ear muscle reflex and stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol: JARO 7:125–139

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman SS, Mertes IB, Lewis JD, Weissbeck DK (2013) Medial olivocochlear-induced transient-evoked otoacoustic emission amplitude shifts in individual subjects. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO

  • Guinan JJ Jr (2006) Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear 27:589–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guinan JJ Jr, Backus BC, Lilaonitkul W, Aharonson V (2003) Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol: JARO 4:521–540

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp DT, Chum R (1980) Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions. Hear Res 2:213–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JU, Ahn YS, Suh JK, Chung JW (2012) Effect of isoflurane on the hearing in mice. Korean Journal of Audiology 16:14–17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Maison SF, Adams JC, Liberman MC (2003) Olivocochlear innervation in the mouse: immunocytochemical maps, crossed versus uncrossed contributions, and transmitter colocalization. J Comp Neurol 455:406–416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Maison SF, Vetter DE, Liberman MC (2007) A novel effect of cochlear efferents: in vivo response enhancement does not require alpha9 cholinergic receptors. J Neurophysiol 97:3269–3278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maison SF, Usubuchi H, Vetter DE, Elgoyhen AB, Thomas SA, Liberman MC (2012) Contralateral-noise effects on cochlear responses in anesthetized mice are dominated by feedback from an unknown pathway. J Neurophysiol 108:491–500

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mertes IB, Goodman SS (2016) Within- and across-subject variability of repeated measurements of medial olivocochlear-induced changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 37:e72–e84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moller AR (1984) Neurophysiological basis of the acoustic middle-ear reflex. Orlando, Academic (1984): 1–35. In: the acoustic reflex: basic principles and clinical applications (Silman S, ed). Orlando: Academic Press

  • Mukerji S, Windsor AM, Lee DJ (2010) Auditory brainstem circuits that mediate the middle ear muscle reflex. Trends Amplif 14:170–191

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Neely ST, Stevenson R (2002) SysRes. Technical memo No. 19, boys town national research hospital. Omaha, Nebraska

  • Neumann J, Uppenkamp S, Kollmeier B (1996) Detection of the acoustic reflex below 80 dB HL. Audiol Neuro-Otol 1:359–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Relkin EM, Sterns A, Azeredo W, Prieve BA, Woods CI (2005) Physiological mechanisms of onset adaptation and contralateral suppression of DPOAEs in the rat. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol: JARO 6:119–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shera CA, Guinan JJ Jr (1999) Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J Acoust Soc Am 105:782–798

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel JH, Charaziak K, Cheatham MA (2011) Transient- and tone-evoked otoacoustic emissions in three species. In: Shera CA, Olson ES (eds) What fire is in mine ears: progress in auditory biomechanics, XIth international mechanics of hearing workshop. American Institute of Phhysics, Melville, pp 307–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun XM (2008) Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears. Hear Res 237:66–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valero MD, Hancock KE, Liberman MC (2016) The middle ear muscle reflex in the diagnosis of cochlear neuropathy. Hear Res 332:29–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berge H, Kingma H, Kluge C, Marres EH (1990) Electrophysiological aspects of the middle ear muscle reflex in the rat: latency, rise time and effect on sound transmission. Hear Res 48:209–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao W, Dhar S (2010) The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol: JARO 11:53–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Work supported by NIDCD Grant #DC000089 to M.A. Cheatham. The authors acknowledge Dr. Dhar and Dr. Charaziak for suggesting some of the analysis methods, and Dr. Zhou for collecting some of the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan H. Siegel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Y., Cheatham, M.A. & Siegel, J.H. Identifying the Origin of Effects of Contralateral Noise on Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Unanesthetized Mice. JARO 18, 543–553 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-017-0616-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-017-0616-x

Keywords

Navigation