Skip to main content
Log in

Pressurized Wideband Acoustic Stapedial Reflex Thresholds: Normal Development and Relationships to Auditory Function in Infants

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study analyzed effects of pressurization on wideband acoustic stapedial-muscle reflex (ASR) tests in infants cared for in normal newborn (NN) and neonatal intensive care units (NICU). Effects of hearing-screening outcomes on ASR threshold measurements were also evaluated, and a subsequent longitudinal study established normative threshold ranges over the first year after birth. An initial experiment compared thresholds in newborns measured at ambient pressure in the ear canal and at the tympanometric peak pressure. ASR thresholds for broadband noise were higher for ears that did not pass newborn hearing screening and ASR threshold was 14 dB higher for real-ear compared to coupler conditions. Effects of pressurization were significant for ears that passed screening; thus, ASR testing in infants should be conducted at tympanometric peak pressure. ASR threshold was significantly higher for ears that referred on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) screening tests and also for ears with conductive and sensorineural hearing loss diagnosed by ABR. Developmental ASR changes were significant over the first year for both normal and NICU infants. Wideband pressurized ASR thresholds are a clinically relevant measure of newborn hearing screening and diagnostic outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIG. 1
FIG. 2
FIG. 3
FIG. 4
FIG. 5
FIG. 6
FIG. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ABR:

Auditory brainstem response

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

ASR:

Acoustic stapedial reflex

ASRT:

ASR threshold

BBN:

Broad band noise

CCHMC:

Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center

CHL:

Conductive hearing loss

DPOAE:

Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission

GSH:

Good Samaritan Hospital

LS:

Least Square

nHL:

Hearing Level referenced to normal hearing

NHS:

Newborn Hearing Screening

NN:

normal newborn

NICU:

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

TEOAE:

Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission

peSPL:

Peak-to-peak equivalent sound pressure level

SNHL:

Sensorineural Hearing Loss

SPL:

Sound Pressure Level

TPP:

Tympanometric Peak Pressure

VRA:

Visual Reinforcement Audiometry

WB-ASRT:

Wideband ASRT

References

  • Bagatto MP, Moodie S, Scollie SD, Seewald RC, Moodie K, Pumford J, Liu KPR (2005) Clinical protocols for hearing instrument fitting in the desired sensation level method. Trends Amplif 9:199–226

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett MJ, Weatherby LA (1982) Newborn acoustic reflexes to noise and puretone signals. J Speech Hear Res 25:383–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elsayed AM, Hunter LL, Keefe DH, Feeney MP, Brown DK, Meinzen-Derr JK, Baroch K, Sullivan-Mahoney M, Francis K, Schaid LG (2015) Air and bone conduction click and tone-burst auditory brainstem thresholds using Kalman adaptive processing in Nonsedated normal-hearing infants. Ear Hear 36:471–481

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney MP, Keefe DH (1999)Acoustic reflex detection using wide-band acoustic reflectance, admittance, and power measurements. J Speech Lang Hear Res 42:1029–1041

  • Feeney MP, Keefe DH (2001) Estimating the acoustic reflex threshold from wideband measures of reflectance, admittance, and power. Ear Hear 22:316–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney MP, Sanford CA (2005) Detection of the acoustic stapedius reflex in infants using wideband energy reflectance and admittance. J Am Acad Audiol 16:278–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney MP, Keefe DH, Marryott LP (2003) Contralateral acoustic reflex thresholds for tonal activators using wideband energy reflectance and admittance. J Speech Lang Hear Res 46:128–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorga MP, Dierking DM, Johnson TA, Beauchaine KL, Garner CA, Neely ST (2005) A validation and potential clinical application of multivariate analysis of distortion product otoacoustic emission data. Ear Hear 26:593–607

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch JE, Margolis RH, Rykken JR (1992) A comparison of acoustic reflex and auditory brain stem response screening of high-risk infants. Ear Hear 13:181–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hof JR, Anteunis LJ, Chenault MN, van Dijk P (2005) Otoacoustic emissions at compensated middle ear pressure in children. Intl J Audiol 44:317–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holte L, Margolis RH, Cavanaugh RM (1991) Developmental changes in multifrequency tympanograms. Audiol 30:1–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter LL, Ries DT, Schlauch RS, Levine SC, Ward WD (1999) Safety and clinical performance of acoustic reflex tests. Ear Hear 20:506–514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter LL, Tubaugh L, Jackson JA, Propes S (2008) Wideband middle ear power measurement in infants and children. J Am Acad Audiol 19:309–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter LL, Keefe DH, Feeney MP, Fitzpatrick DF, Lin L (2015) Longitudinal development of wideband reflectance tympanometry in normal and at-risk infants. Hear Res. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2015.12.014

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joint Committee on Infant Hearing - JCIH (2007) Year 2007 Position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics 120(4):898-921

  • Keefe DH, Fitzpatrick D, Liu YW, Sanford CA, Gorga MP (2010) Wideband acoustic-reflex test in a test battery to predict middle-ear dysfunction. Hear Res 263:52–65. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2009.09.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keefe DH, Hunter LL, Feeney MP, Fitzpatrick D (2015) Procedures for ambient-pressure and tympanometric tests of aural acoustic reflectance and admittance in human infants and adults. J Acoust Soc Am 138:3625–3653. doi:10.1121/1.4936946

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Keefe DH, Feeney MP, Hunter LL, Fitzpatrick DH (2016) Aural acoustic stapedius-muscle reflex threshold procedures to test human infants and adults. J Assn Res Otolaryngol

  • Kei J (2012) Acoustic stapedial reflexes in healthy neonates: normative data and test-retest reliability. J Am Acad Audiol 23:46–56. doi:10.3766/jaaa.23.1.5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YW, Sanford CA, Ellison JC, Fitzpatrick DF, Gorga MP, Keefe DH (2008) Wideband absorbance tympanometry using pressure sweeps: system development and results on adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 124:3708–3719. doi:10.1121/1.3001712

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis RH, Paul S, Saly GL, Schachern PA, Keefe DH (2001) Wideband reflectance tympanometry in chinchillas and human. J Acoust Soc Am 110:1453–1464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazlan R, Kei J, Hickson L, Stapleton C, Grant S et al (2007) High frequency immittance findings: newborn versus six-week-old infants. Int J Audiol 46:711–717. doi:10.1080/14992020701525858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazlan R, Kei J, Hickson L (2009) Test-retest reliability of the acoustic stapedial reflex test in healthy neonates. Ear Hear 30:295–301. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819c3ea0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan PM, Bennett MJ, Marchant CD, Shurin PA (1985) Ipsilateral and contralateral acoustic reflexes in neonates. Ear Hear 6:320–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford CA, Feeney MP (2008) Effects of maturation on tympanometric wideband acoustic transfer functions in human infants. J Acoust Soc Am 124:2106–2122. doi:10.1121/1.2967864

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford CA, Keefe DH, Liu YW, Fitzpatrick D, McCreery et al (2009) Sound-conduction effects on distortion-product otoacoustic emission screening outcomes in newborn infants: test performance of wideband acoustic transfer functions and 1-kHz tympanometry. Ear Hear 30:635–652. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b61cdc

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders JC, Kaltenback JA, Relkin EM (1983) The structural and functional development of the outer and middle ear. In: Romand R, Romand MR (eds) Development of auditory and vestibular systems. Academic Press, New York. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-594450-2.50006-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague BH, Wiley TL, Goldstein R (1985) Tympanometric and acoustic-reflex studies in neonates. J Speech Hear Res 28:265–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trine MB, Hirsch JE, Margolis RH (1993) The effect of middle ear pressure on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 14:401–407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherby LA, Bennett MJ (1980) The neonatal acoustic reflex. Scand Audiol 9:103–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors were assisted by John C. Ellison in preliminary analyses of these reflex data. Portions of these results were presented at the Association for Research in Otolaryngology in 2011 and the American Auditory Society in 2014. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Deafness and other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01 DC010202 and an ARRA supplement (DC010202-01S1). Co-author Keefe is involved in commercializing devices to assess middle-ear function in infants. Lisa Hunter has received honoraria from Interacoustics, Inc. and Vivosonic, Inc. for educational lectures. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The content of this article does not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or of the US Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa L. Hunter.

Ethics declarations

Funding Source

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Deafness and other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01 DC010202 and an ARRA supplement (DC010202-01S1). Co-author Keefe is involved in commercializing devices to assess middle-ear function in infants. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The content of this article does not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or of the United States Government.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hunter, L.L., Keefe, D.H., Feeney, M.P. et al. Pressurized Wideband Acoustic Stapedial Reflex Thresholds: Normal Development and Relationships to Auditory Function in Infants. JARO 18, 49–63 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-016-0595-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-016-0595-3

Keywords

Navigation