Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Erratum to: JARO
DOI 10.1007/s10162-014-0446-z
An error in the calculation of the relative proportion of the slow component of the I h current resulted in an incorrect representation of the total current in Fig. 7. A corrected figure consistent with the parameters in Tables 2 and 3 is shown below.
Comparison of kinetic models of I h in SGNs. A1, Activation. Blue traces are the model for mid-basal cells; red traces are the model for the apical cells. Note the increased current in the middle voltage range for the apical cells. Solid lines are for steps at 10 mV intervals; dashed lines are for intermediate 5 mV intervals. B1, Voltage commands for data in A1. A2, Tail currents (deactivation) following a step to −110 mV, showing the difference in time course and current amplitude between models of mid-basal and apical cells. B2, Voltage commands for the tail currents in A2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-014-0446-z.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Q., Manis, P.B. & Davis, R.L. Erratum to: I h and HCN Channels in Murine Spiral Ganglion Neurons: Tonotopic Variation, Local Heterogeneity, and Kinetic Model. JARO 15, 601 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-014-0473-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-014-0473-9