Contralateral Efferent Reflex Effects on Threshold and Suprathreshold Psychoacoustical Tuning Curves at Low and High Frequencies

  • Enzo Aguilar
  • Almudena Eustaquio-Martin
  • Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda
Research Article


Medial olivocochlear efferent neurons can control cochlear frequency selectivity and may be activated in a reflexive manner by contralateral sounds. The present study investigated the significance of the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) on human psychoacoustical tuning curves (PTCs), a behavioral correlate of cochlear tuning curves. PTCs were measured using forward masking in the presence and in the absence of a contralateral white noise, assumed to elicit the MOCR. To assess MOCR effects on apical and basal cochlear regions over a wide range of sound levels, PTCs were measured for probe frequencies of 500 Hz and 4 kHz and for near- and suprathreshold conditions. Results show that the contralateral noise affected the PTCs predominantly at 500 Hz. At near-threshold levels, its effect was obvious only for frequencies in the tails of the PTCs; at suprathreshold levels, its effects were obvious for all frequencies. It was verified that the effects were not due to the contralateral noise activating the middle-ear muscle reflex or changing the postmechanical rate of recovery from forward masking. A phenomenological computer model of forward masking with efferent control was used to explain the data. The model supports the hypothesis that the behavioral results were due to the contralateral noise reducing apical cochlear gain in a frequency- and level-dependent manner consistent with physiological evidence. Altogether, this shows that the contralateral MOCR may be changing apical cochlear responses in natural, binaural listening situations.


medial olivocochlear reflex efferent control frequency selectivity forward masking cochlear model cochlear nonlinearity 



We are most grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and to Peter T. Johannesen for technical assistance with the middle-ear muscle reflex measurements. Work supported by a grant of the Spanish MICINN (BFU2009-07909) to ELP and a predoctoral studentship of the Chilean CONICYT to EA.


  1. Atcherson SR, Martin MJ, Lintvedt R (2008) Contralateral noise has possible asymmetric frequency-sensitive effect on the 2F1–F2 otoacoustic emission in humans. Neurosci Lett 438:107–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhagat SP, Carter PH (2010) Efferent-induced change in human cochlear compression and its influence on masking of tones. Neurosci Lett 485:94–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen F, Zha D, Fridberger A, Zheng J, Choudhury N, Jacques SL, Wang RK, Shi X, Nuttall AL (2011) A differentially amplified motion in the ear for near-threshold sound detection. Nat Neurosci 14:770–774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Collet L, Kemp DT, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A, Morgon A (1990) Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 43:251–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper NP, Guinan JJ (2006) Efferent-mediated control of basilar membrane motion. J Physiol 576:49–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper NP, Rhode WS (1995) Nonlinear mechanics at the apex of the guinea-pig cochlea. Hear Res 82:225–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper NP, Rhode WS (1996) Two-tone suppression in apical cochlear mechanics. Audit Neurosci 3:123–134Google Scholar
  8. Evans EF (2001) Latest comparison between physiological and behavioral frequency selectivity. In: Breebaart J, Houtsma AJM, Kohlraush A, Prijs VF, Schoonhoven R (eds) Physiological and psychophysical bases of auditory function. Shaker, Maastricht, pp 382–387Google Scholar
  9. Ferry RT, Meddis R (2007) A computer model of medial efferent suppression in the mammalian auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 122:3519–3526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Francis NA, Guinan JJ (2010) Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: implications for cochlear filter bandwidths. Hear Res 267:36–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gifford ML, Guinan JJ (1983) Effects of crossed-olivocochlear-bundle stimulation on cat auditory nerve fiber responses to tones. J Acoust Soc Am 74:115–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guinan JJ (2006) Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear 27:589–607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guinan JJ (2010) Cochlear efferent innervation and function. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 18:447–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guinan JJ (2012) How are inner hair cells stimulated? Evidence for multiple mechanical drives. Hear Res 292:35–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guinan JJ, Gifford ML (1988) Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers. III. Tuning curves and thresholds at CF. Hear Res 37:29–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guinan JJ, Backus BC, Lilaonitkul W, Aharonson V (2003) Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 4:521–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jennings SG, Strickland EA (2012a) Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 132:2497–2513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jennings SG, Strickland EA (2012b) Evaluating the effects of olivocochlear feedback on psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity. J Acoust Soc Am 132:2483–2496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jennings SG, Strickland EA, Heinz MG (2009) Precursor effects on behavioral estimates of frequency selectivity and gain in forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am 125:2172–2181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kawase T, Ogura M, Hidaka H, Sasaki N, Suzuki Y, Takasaka T (2000) Effects of contralateral noise on measurement of the psychophysical tuning curve. Hear Res 142:63–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krull V, Strickland EA (2008) The effect of a precursor on growth of forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am 123:4352–4357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levitt H (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 49:467–477Google Scholar
  23. Lilaonitkul W, Guinan JJ (2009a) Human medial olivocochlear reflex: effects as functions of contralateral, ipsilateral, and bilateral elicitor bandwidths. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 10:459–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lilaonitkul W, Guinan JJ (2009b) Reflex control of the human inner ear: a half-octave offset in medial efferent feedback that is consistent with an efferent role in the control of masking. J Neurophysiol 101:1394–1406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lilaonitkul W, Guinan JJ (2012) Frequency tuning of medial-olivocochlear-efferent acoustic reflexes in humans as functions of probe frequency. J Neurophysiol 107:1598–1611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lopez-Poveda EA, Alves-Pinto A (2008) A variant temporal-masking-curve method for inferring peripheral auditory compression. J Acoust Soc Am 123:1544–1554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lopez-Poveda EA, Eustaquio-Martin A (2006) A biophysical model of the inner hair cell: the contribution of potassium currents to peripheral auditory compression. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 7:218–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lopez-Poveda EA, Meddis R (2001) A human nonlinear cochlear filterbank. J Acoust Soc Am 110:3107–3118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lopez-Poveda EA, Plack CJ, Meddis R (2003) Cochlear nonlinearity between 500 and 8000 Hz in listeners with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 113:951–960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lopez-Poveda EA, Plack CJ, Meddis R, Blanco JL (2005) Cochlear compression in listeners with moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Hear Res 205:172–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lopez-Poveda EA, Barrios LF, Alves-Pinto A (2007) Psychophysical estimates of level-dependent best-frequency shifts in the apical region of the human basilar membrane. J Acoust Soc Am 121:3646–3654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lopez-Poveda EA, Aguilar E, Johannesen PT, Eustaquio-Martín A (2013) Contralateral efferent regulation of human cochlear tuning: behavioral observations and computer model simulations. In: Moore BCJ, Gockel H, Carlyon RP, Winter IM, Patterson RD (eds) Basic aspects of hearing: a compilation of papers from the 16th International Symposium on Hearing. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Meddis R, O’Mard L, Lopez-Poveda EA (2001) A computational algorithm for computing nonlinear auditory frequency selectivity. J Acoust Soc Am 109:2852–2861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR, Roberts B (1984) Refining the measurement of psychophysical tuning curves. J Acoust Soc Am 76:1057–1066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murugasu E, Russell IJ (1996) The effect of efferent stimulation on basilar membrane displacement in the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea. J Neurosci 16:325–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Nelson DA, Schroder AC, Wojtczak M (2001) A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 110:2045–2064PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Neumann J, Uppenkamp S, Kollmeier B (1996) Detection of the acoustic reflex below 80 dB HL. Audiol Neuro Otol 1:359–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. O’Loughlin BJ, Moore BCJ (1981) Off-frequency listening: effects on psychoacoustical tuning curves obtained in simultaneous and forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am 69:1119–1125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oxenham AJ (2001) Forward masking: adaptation or integration? J Acoust Soc Am 109:732–741PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oxenham AJ, Moore BC (1994) Modeling the additivity of nonsimultaneous masking. Hear Res 80:105–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Patterson RD, Nimmo-Smith I (1980) Off-frequency listening and auditory-filter asymmetry. J Acoust Soc Am 67:229–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Plack CJ, Arifianto D (2010) On- and off-frequency compression estimated using a new version of the additivity of forward masking technique. J Acoust Soc Am 128:771–786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Plack CJ, Drga V (2003) Psychophysical evidence for auditory compression at low characteristic frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 113:1574–1586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Plack CJ, Oxenham AJ, Drga V (2002) Linear and nonlinear processes in temporal masking. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 88:348–358Google Scholar
  45. Plack CJ, Drga V, Lopez-Poveda EA (2004) Inferred basilar-membrane response functions for listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 115:1684–1695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Quaranta N, Scaringi A, Nahum S, Quaranta A (2005) Effects of efferent acoustic reflex activation on psychoacoustical tuning curves in humans. Acta Otolaryngol 125:520–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rhode WS, Cooper NP (1996) Nonlinear mechanics in the apical turn of the chinchilla cochlea in vivo. Audit Neurosci 3:101–121Google Scholar
  48. Rhode WS, Recio A (2000) Study of mechanical motions in the basal region of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 107:3317–3332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robertson D, Gummer M (1985) Physiological and morphological characterization of efferent neurones in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res 20:63–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robles L, Ruggero MA (2001) Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev 81:1305–1352PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Rodriguez J, Neely ST, Patra H, Kopun J, Jesteadt W, Tan H, Gorga MP (2010) The role of suppression in psychophysical tone-on-tone masking. J Acoust Soc Am 127:361–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ruggero MA, Robles L, Rich NC (1992) Two-tone suppression in the basilar membrane of the cochlea: mechanical basis of auditory-nerve rate suppression. J Neurophysiol 68:1087–1099PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Russell IJ, Murugasu E (1997) Medial efferent inhibition suppresses basilar membrane responses to near characteristic frequency tones of moderate to high intensities. J Acoust Soc Am 102:1734–1738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shera CA, Guinan JJ, Oxenham AJ (2002) Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:3318–3323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Small AM (1959) Pure-tone masking. J Acoust Soc Am 31:1619–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Souter M (1995) Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise. Hear Res 91:167–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stainsby TH, Moore BC (2006) Temporal masking curves for hearing-impaired listeners. Hear Res 218:98–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Strickland EA (2001) The relationship between frequency selectivity and overshoot. J Acoust Soc Am 109:2062–2073PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sun XM (2008) Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears. Hear Res 237:66–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vinay, Moore BCJ (2008) Effects of activation of the efferent system on psychophysical tuning curves as a function of signal frequency. Hear Res 240:93–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wojtczak M, Oxenham AJ (2009) Pitfalls in behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 125:270–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yasin I, Plack CJ (2003) The effects of a high-frequency suppressor on tuning curves and derived basilar-membrane response functions. J Acoust Soc Am 114:322–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enzo Aguilar
    • 1
  • Almudena Eustaquio-Martin
    • 1
  • Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León and Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas de SalamancaUniversidad de SalamancaSalamancaSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de MedicinaUniversidad de SalamancaSalamancaSpain

Personalised recommendations